Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Retro Laminar Block Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block in Multiple Rib Fractures

June 19, 2025 updated by: Hossam Ibrahim Elsayed Ibrahim, Tanta University

Impact of Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Retro Laminar Block Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block on Incentive Spirometry Volumes and Pain Scores in Multiple Rib Fractures

The aim of this study is to compare the incentive spirometry volume and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided continuous Retrolaminar block and continuous Erector spinae plain block in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) are strongly recommended techniques for managing thoracic neuropathic pain However, they can be technically challenging to perform and are associated with up to 15% failure rate in Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)and potential risk of pneumothorax in thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB).Newer approaches have been the focus of many studies in recent years; these approaches include retrolaminar block and erector spinae plane block.

Retrolaminar block (RLB) is a new thoracic truncal block for controlling somatic pain in both the thoracic and abdominal walls.

The Erector Spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used successfully to manage severe neuropathic pain arising from ribs .The basis to use ESPB is its likely site of action which is the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El-Gharbia
      • Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt, 31527
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 65 years old.
  • Both sexes.
  • Patients with unilateral multiple traumatic rib fractures (≥ 3 ribs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1st ken refusal.
  • Patients with any contraindication for regional block as:

    • Bleeding disorders.
    • Infection at the injection site.
    • Patients with hemodynamic instability.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to the study drugs
  • Unconscious patients
  • Patients with significant trauma outside the chest wall e.g., acute spine or pelvic fracture, severe traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, or abdominal visceral injuries
  • Patients with significant lung contusions, pneumothorax, flail chest
  • Chronic opioid users.
  • Uncooperative patients and patients with psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (Retrolaminar block group)
Patients received ultrasound guided Retrolaminar block bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine then continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1 mL/kg/hr. for 4 days

Under complete aseptic precautions and sterilization and in sitting position, A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe (6-11 MHz) was placed into a longitudinal orientation in the paraspinous line 1 cm from the midline. Lamina appeared as a continuous line interrupted by the intra laminar spaces.

local infiltration of needle insertion site with 3ml of 2.0 % lidocaine was done Then, an 18-gauge Tuohy needle was inserted in plane 1 cm lateral to the spinous process using ultrasound imaging and advanced caudally or cranially until it contacts the lamina.

Experimental: Group II (Erector spinae plane block group)
Patients received ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine then continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1 mL/kg/hr. for 4 days

Under complete aseptic precautions and sterilization and in sitting position, A high-frequency ultrasound transducer was placed in a longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral to the midline midway between the uppermost and the lowest fractured rib to identify counting of ribs using ultrasound three muscles were identified as superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow as follows: trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae. However, when the rhomboid major muscle disappears this indicates that we are at the level of the seventh thoracic vertebra.

local infiltration of needle insertion site with 3ml of 2.0 % lidocaine was done. Then, an 18-gauge Tuohy needle was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum inspired volume
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.

Maximum inspired volume will be measure by incentive spirometry which indicate less pain.

Inspiratory capacity (IC) measured by Incentive Spirometry before the block, 30 minutes, 60 minutes after the blocks and then every six hours for subsequent 4 days.

4 days after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily and total rescue analgesics consumption.
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention.
Need for rescue analgesia and the total consumption of morphine in the form of incremental doses (0.05mg /kg) if Visual Analogue Score (VAS) ≥4 Pain score will be measured by Visual Analogue Score (VAS) from 0 to 10. Where 0: no pain, 10: the worst pain
24 hours after intervention.
Intensive care length of stay.
Time Frame: 28 days after intervention
Time from admission till Intensive care discharge
28 days after intervention
Hospital length of stay.
Time Frame: 28 days after intervention
Time from admission till Hospital discharge
28 days after intervention
pH
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
pH will be measure before the block ,6 hours after the block and then daily for subsequent 4 days.
4 days after intervention.
PaO2
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
PaO2 will be measure before the block ,6 hours after the block and then daily for subsequent 4 days.
4 days after intervention.
PaCo2
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
PaCo2 will be measure before the block ,6 hours after the block and then daily for subsequent 4 days.
4 days after intervention.
FiO2
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
FiO2 will be measure before the block ,6 hours after the block and then daily for subsequent 4 days.
4 days after intervention.
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
Respiratory rate will be measure before the block ,6 hours after the block and then daily for subsequent 4 days.
4 days after intervention.
Adverse effects and complications.
Time Frame: 4 days after intervention.
Adverse effects and complications such as hypotension, complications related to catheter insertion, pneumothorax, local anesthetic toxicity, and respiratory depression
4 days after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 36264MD35/2/23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe