- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06094270
Artificial-intelligence-based Reporting Technology for Endoscopy Monitoring and Imaging System (ARTEMIS)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This study aims to compare withdrawal time precision calculated by an AI system with examiner-reported times during colonoscopy, also evaluating endoscopists' satisfaction with the images included in the AI-generated reports. The study will be single-center and endoscopist-blinded, where 138 patients are expected to be recruited, taking polyp detection rates and potential dropouts into consideration. Manual annotation of withdrawal times from examination recordings will establish gold standard annotations. The AI system performs a frame-by-frame analysis of endoscopy recordings, predicting endoscopic findings. Using a rule-based logic, the method calculates withdrawal time for the examination and automatically generates a report for the examination. The study will include consenting adult patients eligible for colonoscopy, excluding those meeting specific criteria.
In this observational study, the withdrawal time for the examinations of all recruited patients is estimated by both the physician and the AI method. The study does not relate to any particular indication, and any patient that is appointed for a colonoscopy and does not meet the exclusion criteria can be recruited. The AI method operates in the background, having no influence on the examination's process, or outcome. The standard procedure requires physicians to estimate the withdrawal time and document it in the examination report. Simultaneously, the proposed AI method also computes the withdrawal time for all patients in the background, without affecting the physician, the examination, or the outcomes of the examination. Importantly, the physician remains blinded to the AI model's output.
To establish the gold standard withdrawal time, manual calculations will be performed using the recorded examination data for all patients. This gold standard is used for evaluating errors in withdrawal time estimation made by both the physician and the AI method. Subsequently, a comparative analysis is conducted to assess the disparities between the physician's estimations and those of the AI method.
Furthermore, the AI method captures characteristic images of anatomical landmarks and notable events, such as polyp resections, during the examination. A panel of certified endoscopists will rigorously evaluate the quality and relevance of these selected images.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Alexander Hann
- Phone Number: +49 931 201-45918
- Email: hann_a@ukw.de
Study Locations
-
-
Bayern
-
Würzburg, Bayern, Germany, 97080
- Recruiting
- Universitatsklinikum Wurzburg
-
Contact:
- Alexander Hann, Prof. Dr. med.
- Phone Number: +49 931 201-45918
- Email: Hann_A@ukw.de
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Scheduled for colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient / Examination level
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Familial Polyposis Syndrome
- Patient after radiation/resection of colonic parts
Data level
- Endoscopic recordings started after beginning of withdrawal.
- Examination recordings stopped before the end of the examination.
- Examinations with corrupt video signal
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention arm
All patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The withdrawal time for the interventions for all patients is documented by the physician and the proposed AI system.
|
Withdrawal time is calculated and an image report is generated using the EndoMind system.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Withdrawal time error comparison for colonoscopies using the proposed AI system versus physician estimation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
The error between gold standard withdrawal time and the withdrawal time estimated from the proposed AI system and the physician are compared for the same examination.
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Image quality satisfaction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
A board of endoscopy experts receives the reports generated by the proposed system and evaluate the quality and satisfaction for the images included in the report.
Evaluation will be performed on a Likert scale from 1 to 5.
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Subgroup analysis for withdrawal time calculation error based on the presence or absence of resections in the examination.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Interventions will be split into two categories, those containing at least one resection and those without any resections.The error between gold standard withdrawal time and the withdrawal time estimated from the proposed AI system and the physician are compared for each subgroups of examinations separately.
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Number of examination where withdrawal time could not be determined
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Evaluation of the number of examinations where the withdrawal time could not be calculated and the causes.
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- AI03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy
-
Borland-Groover ClinicValley Medical Products, LLC is paying for the study and is the sponsor....CompletedColonoscopy | Screening Colonoscopy | Surveillance ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Josue AliagaCompleted
-
Endostart srlCompleted
-
Hospital Central Norte PEMEXCompletedPerformance of Colonoscopy | Tolerance of ColonoscopyMexico
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownInadequate Preparation for Colonoscopy; Personalized Colonoscopy PreparationIsrael
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Palo Alto Health Care System; VA Northern California Health Care SystemCompletedWater Exchange Colonoscopy | Unsedated Colonoscopy | Cap | Colonoscopy PainUnited States
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalCompletedColonoscopy | Intubation Time | Cap-assisted ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Valduce HospitalCompletedUnsedated Colonoscopy | Warm Water | CO2 ColonoscopyItaly
-
Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research...UnknownColonoscopy | Complete Colonoscopy | Cecum Intubation Time | İleum Intubation TimeTurkey
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on EndoMind
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalKlinikum StuttgartCompletedArtificial Intelligence | Polyps of Colon | Surveillance Endoscopy for Colorectal Cancer | CADeGermany
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCompletedGastroesophageal HerniaGermany
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalRecruitingColorectal Adenoma | Colorectal PolypGermany