Artificial-intelligence-based Reporting Technology for Endoscopy Monitoring and Imaging System (ARTEMIS)

May 8, 2024 updated by: Wuerzburg University Hospital
Properly documenting withdrawal time in colonoscopy is essential for quality assessment and cost allocation. However, reporting withdrawal time has significant interobserver variability. Additionally, current manual documentation of endoscopic findings is time-consuming and distracting for the physician. This trial examines an artificial intelligence based system to determine withdrawal time and create a structured report, including high-quality images (AI) of detected polyps and landmarks.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare withdrawal time precision calculated by an AI system with examiner-reported times during colonoscopy, also evaluating endoscopists' satisfaction with the images included in the AI-generated reports. The study will be single-center and endoscopist-blinded, where 138 patients are expected to be recruited, taking polyp detection rates and potential dropouts into consideration. Manual annotation of withdrawal times from examination recordings will establish gold standard annotations. The AI system performs a frame-by-frame analysis of endoscopy recordings, predicting endoscopic findings. Using a rule-based logic, the method calculates withdrawal time for the examination and automatically generates a report for the examination. The study will include consenting adult patients eligible for colonoscopy, excluding those meeting specific criteria.

In this observational study, the withdrawal time for the examinations of all recruited patients is estimated by both the physician and the AI method. The study does not relate to any particular indication, and any patient that is appointed for a colonoscopy and does not meet the exclusion criteria can be recruited. The AI method operates in the background, having no influence on the examination's process, or outcome. The standard procedure requires physicians to estimate the withdrawal time and document it in the examination report. Simultaneously, the proposed AI method also computes the withdrawal time for all patients in the background, without affecting the physician, the examination, or the outcomes of the examination. Importantly, the physician remains blinded to the AI model's output.

To establish the gold standard withdrawal time, manual calculations will be performed using the recorded examination data for all patients. This gold standard is used for evaluating errors in withdrawal time estimation made by both the physician and the AI method. Subsequently, a comparative analysis is conducted to assess the disparities between the physician's estimations and those of the AI method.

Furthermore, the AI method captures characteristic images of anatomical landmarks and notable events, such as polyp resections, during the examination. A panel of certified endoscopists will rigorously evaluate the quality and relevance of these selected images.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

138

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Alexander Hann
  • Phone Number: +49 931 201-45918
  • Email: hann_a@ukw.de

Study Locations

    • Bayern
      • Würzburg, Bayern, Germany, 97080
        • Recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Wurzburg
        • Contact:
          • Alexander Hann, Prof. Dr. med.
          • Phone Number: +49 931 201-45918
          • Email: Hann_A@ukw.de

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients (>18 years) scheduled for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (>18 years)
  • Scheduled for colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient / Examination level

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Familial Polyposis Syndrome
  • Patient after radiation/resection of colonic parts

Data level

  • Endoscopic recordings started after beginning of withdrawal.
  • Examination recordings stopped before the end of the examination.
  • Examinations with corrupt video signal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
All patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The withdrawal time for the interventions for all patients is documented by the physician and the proposed AI system.
Withdrawal time is calculated and an image report is generated using the EndoMind system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Withdrawal time error comparison for colonoscopies using the proposed AI system versus physician estimation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
The error between gold standard withdrawal time and the withdrawal time estimated from the proposed AI system and the physician are compared for the same examination.
Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image quality satisfaction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
A board of endoscopy experts receives the reports generated by the proposed system and evaluate the quality and satisfaction for the images included in the report. Evaluation will be performed on a Likert scale from 1 to 5.
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Subgroup analysis for withdrawal time calculation error based on the presence or absence of resections in the examination.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Interventions will be split into two categories, those containing at least one resection and those without any resections.The error between gold standard withdrawal time and the withdrawal time estimated from the proposed AI system and the physician are compared for each subgroups of examinations separately.
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Number of examination where withdrawal time could not be determined
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
Evaluation of the number of examinations where the withdrawal time could not be calculated and the causes.
Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Clinical Trials on EndoMind

3
Subscribe