Ketamine and Neurofeedback-Training: Effects on Neuroplasticity in Cocaine Addiction (Co-Boost)

December 17, 2024 updated by: Dr. med. Marcus Herdener

Boosting and Guiding Neuroplasticity by Combining Ketamine with Neurofeedback-assisted Learning - Towards an Individualized and Integrated Pharmaco-psychotherapy for Cocaine Addiction

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects of the combination of ketamine and realtime functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback training in individuals with cocaine use disorder. The main questions the investigators aim to answer are:

  • Can the investigators observe a positive, significant effect on percentage of cocaine use days of both interventions combined as well as stand alone interventions?
  • Is there a significant transfer effect of the neurofeedback training?
  • Is there a significant, ketamine-dependent change in glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens?

Participants will be given ketamine and a realtime fMRI neurofeedback training. Both interventions are placebo-controlled. The investigators will compare the four intervention groups to investigate the effects of the stand-alone effects of the intervention and the combination of it.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cocaine is the most frequently used stimulant worldwide, and its consumption rate in Europe indicates a continuing upward trend. Cocaine use is associated with great harms for affected individuals, their families, and the society. Unfortunately, until today no pharmacotherapy has been approved for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD) due to lack of efficacy of tested compounds.

The investigators therefore propose, to use latest advancements in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and real time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback training (rt-fMRI NFT) to develop a neurobiologically informed experimental approach for an individualized and integrated pharmaco-psychotherapy that has the potential to open new avenues for the treatment of CUD, and in addition, to be transferable to other neuropsychiatric conditions.

To improve the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals with CUD, the investigators recently developed an rt-fMRI NFT paradigm based on reward imagery to specifically modify maladaptive reward sensitivity by self-regulating the brain's reward circuits.

Furthermore, using a 1H-MRS technique, the investigators recently demonstrated that a disturbed glutamate homeostasis in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), an important hub in the brain's reward system, characterizes cue-induced craving in CUD. This indicates that urgently needed novel pharmacotherapies for addiction treatment should target the glutamatergic system.

Thus, to restore the glutamate homeostasis and to boost learning effect of the reward imagery training, the investigators propose to combine reward imagery rt- fMRI NFT with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine, which has direct effects both on glutamatergic signaling and neuroplasticity and has shown therapeutic potential to reduce cocaine craving and cocaine us.

The investigators anticipate a) restoration of the glutamate homeostasis in the NAcc b) changes in maladaptive reward sensitivity resulting from rt-fMRI NFT and c) synergistic effects of the pharmacological and the psychotherapeutic effect due to the ketamine-induced neuroplasticity that might open a window of opportunity for imagery-based learning. The investigators hypothesize that these neurobiological adaptions induced by the described interventions underlie their therapeutic effects on cocaine craving and use.

The effects of ketamine and reward imagery rt-fMRI NFT in individuals with CUD will be tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, parallel group study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Male and female cocaine users 18 to 55 years of age
  • diagnostic and statisical manual (DSM)-5 diagnosis of CUD
  • Willingness to comply with the study protocol as explained by investigator
  • Normal level of language comprehension (German or Swiss-German)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or lifetime psychotic disorders
  • History of severe substance-induced psychosis
  • Current or lifetime bipolar I or II disorders
  • Current suicidality
  • Previous suicide attempts during the last 2 years
  • Current severe alcohol use disorder
  • Current severe cannabis use disorder
  • Current moderate or severe stimulant use disorder (other than cocaine)
  • Current moderate or severe benzodiazepine use disorder
  • Current opioid use disorder
  • First-degree relatives with psychotic disorders
  • Beck Depression Inventory Score greater than 25
  • Unmedicated or unstable hypertension
  • Severe illness (e. g. myocardial ischemia or arrythmias, severe pulmonary secretions, glaucoma, congestive heart failure or angina, significant renal or hepatic impairment)
  • Acute infection (e. g. pulmonary or upper respiratory tract infection)
  • Insufficient treated or uncorrected hyperthyroidism
  • Severe central nervous system related traumas or disorders (e. g. stroke, cerebral trauma with loss of consciousness over more than 24h, epilepsy)
  • Increased intracranial pressure
  • Medication directly affecting glutamate signaling (e. g. anticonvulsant medication)
  • Any unstable psychoactive medication (no changes in compounds within last 4 weeks before start of study)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Women of childbearing potential with no use of medically accepted contraceptive (e. g.

condoms, contraceptive diaphragm, birth control pill, hormone injection, intrauterine device)

  • BMI>35
  • Allergy, hypersensitivity, or other adverse reaction to previous use of ketamine
  • Contradictions to magnetic resonance imaging
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: rt-fMRI NFT / Placebo
Participants get real time neurofeedback based on an experimental regions' activity and receive a 0.9% saline solution (i.v.) over 40 minutes.
single dose of placebo (0.9% saline solution i.v. over 40 minutes)
Other Names:
  • 0.9% saline solution
Real-time fMRI based neurofeedback over 20 minutes where participants are instructed to perform reward imagery. The feedback is based on an experimental region. The training is repeated three times.
Experimental: rt-fMRI NFT / Ketamine
Participants get real time neurofeedback based on an experimental regions' activity and receive 0.71mg ketamine (i.v.) per kilogram bodyweight.
single dose of ketamine (0.71mg/kg bodyweight i.v. over 40 minutes)
Real-time fMRI based neurofeedback over 20 minutes where participants are instructed to perform reward imagery. The feedback is based on an experimental region. The training is repeated three times.
Placebo Comparator: sham NFT / Placebo
Participants get a real time neurofeedback based on a control regions' activity, which serves as a sham region and receive a 0.9% saline solution (i.v.) over 40 minutes.
single dose of placebo (0.9% saline solution i.v. over 40 minutes)
Other Names:
  • 0.9% saline solution
Sham real-time fMRI neurofeedback training over 20 minutes where participants are instructed to perform reward imagery. The feedback is based on a control region. The training is repeated three times.
Experimental: sham NFT / Ketamine
Participants get a real time neurofeedback based on a control regions' activity, which serves as a sham region and receive 0.71mg ketamine (i.v.) per kilogram bodyweight.
single dose of ketamine (0.71mg/kg bodyweight i.v. over 40 minutes)
Sham real-time fMRI neurofeedback training over 20 minutes where participants are instructed to perform reward imagery. The feedback is based on a control region. The training is repeated three times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in proportion of cocaine use days
Time Frame: Between 5 and 7 weeks after baseline (the first intervention visit)
Between-group comparison of proportion of cocaine use days measured with Time-Line Follow-Back questionnaire for cocaine use on follow-up visit (t3).
Between 5 and 7 weeks after baseline (the first intervention visit)
Changes in accumbal glutamate levels
Time Frame: Before and during infusion (same day)
Baseline and acute accumbal glutamate levels assessed with 1H-MRS on Intervention Visit I (t1).
Before and during infusion (same day)
Changes in fMRI signal of neurofeedback training
Time Frame: Between 1 and 2 weeks after baseline (the first neurofeedback training)
Signal changes assessed with fMRI between the non-neurofeedback run 1 on Interention Visit I (t1) and run 3 on Intervention Visit II (t2).
Between 1 and 2 weeks after baseline (the first neurofeedback training)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in urine cocaine and cocaine metabolites
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit) up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Changes in cocaine and cocaine metabolites via urine analysis as objectified measure of cocaine use.
Baseline (screening visit) up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Cocaine craving
Time Frame: From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in cocaine craving score assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Cocaine Use Scale, ranging from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more problematic behavior and thoughts.
From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Severity of cocaine use disorder
Time Frame: From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in severity of cocaine use disorder assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Cocaine Use Scale, ranging from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more problematic behavior and thoughts.
From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Current motivation to change cocaine use behaviour
Time Frame: From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in current motivation to change cocaine use behaviour assessed by an visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate a higher motivation to change.
From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Hedonic capacity
Time Frame: From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in hedonic capacity measured by the Trait Hedonic Capacity Scale, ranging from 16 to 80, where a higher score indicates a higher hedonic capacity.
From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Experience of pleasure across different domains
Time Frame: From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in the experience of pleasure across different domains assessed by the Domains of Pleasure Scale, ranging from 0 to 210 where a higher score indicates a higher experience of pleasure.
From baseline (screening visit) until 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Emotion regulation skills
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit) and up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Changes in emotion regulation skills measured with the Negative Mood Regulation expectancies Scale, ranging from 30 to 150 where higher scores indicate higher emotion regulation skills.
Baseline (screening visit) and up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), and up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Changes in depressive symptoms measured with the Beck Depression Inventory. The scale ranges from 0 to 63 where higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), and up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit)
Perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in perceived stress assessed with a subscale of the Stress & Coping Inventory, ranging from 21 to 147 where higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.
Baseline (screening visit), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Self-esteem
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in self-esteem assessed with the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, ranging from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate a higher self-esteem.
Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism
Time Frame: Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Changes in Self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism assessed with the Questionnaire for Self-efficacy, Optimism, and Pessimism (KSWOP-9), ranging from 9 to 36 where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism, respectively.
Baseline (screening visit), up to 14 weeks later (Intervention Visit II), up to 19 weeks later (Follow-up Visit), and up to 38 weeks later (Follow-up Survey)
Subjective effects of ketamine infusion
Time Frame: 2 hours post infusion
Assess the acute subjective effects of the infusion with the Five-Dimension Altered State of Consciousness Questionnaire (5D-ASC), where the global score and each of the 11 subscales range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate the occurence of altered states of consciousness.
2 hours post infusion
Effects of ketamine infusion on mystic experiences
Time Frame: 2 hours post infusion
Assess the acute subjective effects of the infusion with the Hood's Mysticism Scale, ranging from 20 to 100 where higher scores indicate the occurence of mystic experiences.
2 hours post infusion
Sustained changes in accumbal glutamate levels
Time Frame: Baseline (pre infusion, Intervention Visit I) and up to 2 weeks after infusion and neurofeedback training (Intervention Visit II)
Assess sustained effects of the infusion and the neurofeedback training on baseline accumbal glutamate levels with 1H-MRS.
Baseline (pre infusion, Intervention Visit I) and up to 2 weeks after infusion and neurofeedback training (Intervention Visit II)
Glutamate levels during craving paradigm
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks post infusion and neurofeedback training
Assess the effects of the infusion and the neurofeedback training on glutamate levels measured by 1H-MRS during a craving paradigm.
Up to 2 weeks post infusion and neurofeedback training
Changes in Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor
Time Frame: 0.5 hours pre infusion and 2 hours post infusion
Assess changes in Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) through blood analysis before and after the infusion.
0.5 hours pre infusion and 2 hours post infusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Our data will be published on the website of Open Science Framework.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the publication of our data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cocaine Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe