Effects of Hyaluronic Acid Injection and Exercise Treatments in Knee Osteoarthritis

December 27, 2023 updated by: Bilal Uysal, Balikesir University

Effects of Hyaluronic Acid Injection and Exercise Therapies on Proprioception, Gait Analysis and Quality of Life in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases that most often causes physical disability. Physical therapy modalities, exercise programs and intra-articular injections are widely used in the treatment of OA.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of adding different exercise treatments to hyaluronan injection on proprioception, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with knee OA.

Methods: A total of 54 patients were included in the study and were randomized into three groups. Quadriceps strengthening exercises were applied to the patients in Group 1, a home exercise program was applied to the patients in Group 2, and no exercise program was applied to the patients in Group 3. Additionally, all patients received patient education and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection into the symptomatic knee. Standard forms were filled out to evaluate the patients' pain, functional status and quality of life. Muscle strength and proprioception were evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer. Changes in the patients' walking parameters were evaluated by gait analysis. Evaluations were made at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and at the 3rd and 6th months of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases that most often causes physical disability. The most common type of osteoarthritis with the highest incidence in the clinic is knee osteoarthritis. Physical therapy modalities, exercise programs and intra-articular injections are widely used in the treatment of knee OA.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of adding different exercise treatments to hyaluronan injection on proprioception, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with knee OA.

Methods: A total of 54 patients with stage II and III primary knee OA were included in the study. The patients included in the study were divided into 3 groups by randomization. For randomization, envelopes containing the letters A, B and C were prepared for the patients included in the study. The patients included in the study randomly selected one of the envelopes. Patients who chose the envelope with the letter A were included in the 1st group, patients who chose the envelope with the letter B were included in the 2nd group, and patients who chose the envelope with the letter C were included in the 3rd group. The researchers who made the assessment measurements were unaware of which patient was in which group. Statistical analysis of the results was performed by a biostatistician who had no information about the therapies the patient groups received. Quadriceps strengthening exercises were applied to the patients in Group 1 with the isokinetic dynamometer device, a home exercise program was applied to the patients in Group 2, and no exercise program was applied to the patients in Group 3. Additionally, all patients received patient education and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection (once a week, 3 times in total) into the symptomatic knee. Standard forms were filled out to evaluate the patients' pain, functional status and quality of life. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne knee index and The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scales were used to evaluate the patients' functional status and quality of life. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain conditions of the patients. Muscle strength and proprioception were evaluated with an isokinetic dynamometer. Changes in the patients' walking parameters were evaluated by gait analysis. Evaluations were made at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and at the 3rd and 6th months of treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Balıkesir, Turkey, 10145
        • Balikesir University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria
  • Patients with a radiological diagnosis of stage 2 and 3 primary knee osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren & Lawrence Scale
  • Patients with knee osteoarthritis between the ages of 45-65
  • Patients giving informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with secondary knee osteoarthritis
  • Patients with decompensated organ failure that prevents them from exercising
  • Patients with lower extremity neurological deficits affecting gait and proprioception
  • Patients who had fracture affecting the knee joints, patients who underwent a surgical intervention, patients who underwent intraarticular injection for knees within the last 6 months,
  • Inflammatory rheumatic disorders
  • Patients using anticoagulant medication
  • Patients with bleeding disorders
  • Malignancy
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who are with diabetes
  • Patients who are with active vestibular disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Grup 1 quadriceps strengthening exercises

The patients in group 1 received Quadriceps strengthening exercises with isokinetic dynamometer device. Strengthening exercises were applied to the Quadriceps muscle group by the physiotherapist for 4 weeks, 3 days a week, 30 minutes a day, for a total of 12 sessions.

All patients received patient education and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection (once a week, 3 times in total) into the symptomatic knee.

Patient education: Just before the start of treatment, an education program consisting of general information about their disease, daily activity modifications and knee joint protection principles was applied by the physician to the patients within a period of approximately 10-15 minutes.

Hyaluronic acid was injected into the symptomatic knees of the patients a total of 3 times, once a week for 3 weeks.

Injections were administered by the physician using a lateral approach with the patient lying on his back and the knee in full extension.

After each injection, patients were warned to apply cold to avoid possible local reactions and not to overload for 24 hours.

Hyaluronic acid preparation was in the form of 2.5 ml solutions obtained biotechnologically, containing 10 mg sodium hyaluronan in each milliliter.

The hyaluronan in solution was of medium molecular weight (0.9 million daltons) but still lower molecular weight than the hyaluronan in normal healthy synovial fluid.

Active Comparator: Grup 2 a home exercise program

The patients in group 2 received a home exercise program. A home exercise program consisting of knee joint range of motion, quadriceps adjustment, and strengthening exercises for abductor and adductor muscle groups was demonstrated by the physiotherapist.They were asked to do the exercises 5 days a week, 2 times a day, with 10 repetitions. Patients were called every 15 days and asked to continue their home exercise program.

All patients received patient education and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection (once a week, 3 times in total) into the symptomatic knee.

Patient education: Just before the start of treatment, an education program consisting of general information about their disease, daily activity modifications and knee joint protection principles was applied by the physician to the patients within a period of approximately 10-15 minutes.

Hyaluronic acid was injected into the symptomatic knees of the patients a total of 3 times, once a week for 3 weeks.

Injections were administered by the physician using a lateral approach with the patient lying on his back and the knee in full extension.

After each injection, patients were warned to apply cold to avoid possible local reactions and not to overload for 24 hours.

Hyaluronic acid preparation was in the form of 2.5 ml solutions obtained biotechnologically, containing 10 mg sodium hyaluronan in each milliliter.

The hyaluronan in solution was of medium molecular weight (0.9 million daltons) but still lower molecular weight than the hyaluronan in normal healthy synovial fluid.

Placebo Comparator: Grup 3 did not receive exercise

The patients in group 3 did not receive an exercise program.

All patients received patient education and intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection (once a week, 3 times in total) into the symptomatic knee.

Patient education: Just before the start of treatment, an education program consisting of general information about their disease, daily activity modifications and knee joint protection principles was applied by the physician to the patients within a period of approximately 10-15 minutes.

Hyaluronic acid was injected into the symptomatic knees of the patients a total of 3 times, once a week for 3 weeks.

Injections were administered by the physician using a lateral approach with the patient lying on his back and the knee in full extension.

After each injection, patients were warned to apply cold to avoid possible local reactions and not to overload for 24 hours.

Hyaluronic acid preparation was in the form of 2.5 ml solutions obtained biotechnologically, containing 10 mg sodium hyaluronan in each milliliter.

The hyaluronan in solution was of medium molecular weight (0.9 million daltons) but still lower molecular weight than the hyaluronan in normal healthy synovial fluid.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale-pain,
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Detection of changes in Visual Analogue Scale-pain. VAS consists of a 10 cm (or 100 mm) long line drawn on a horizontal axis. The distance from the lowest VAS value to the patient's mark is measured in mm (0-100). 0 no pain, 100 mm worst pain
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Detection of changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. It consists of three parts: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items). It contains 24 items in total. The scoring of the items is based on the Likert scale. In the Likert scale, patients indicate pain and difficulty levels by giving scores between 0 and 4 which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Lequesne knee index
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Detection of changes in Lequesne knee index. It is a 10-item scale consisting of 3 parts: pain/discomfort, activities of daily living and maximum walking distance.
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment

Detection of changes in The Health Assessment Questionnaire. The Health Assessment Questionnaire has a total of 20 questions covering 8 areas related to dressing, sitting up, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, grasping and daily tasks. The test score is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of marked questions. Scoring is between 0 and 3 points.

(0: Doing the activity without difficulty, 1: Doing it with some difficulty, 2: Performing it with great difficulty, 3: Not being able to do it at all)

At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle strength
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Detection of changes in muscle strength. Muscle strength was measured with a Biodex System 3 Pro Multijoint System® isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Inc, Shirley / NY, USA).
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Proprioception
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment
Detection of changes in proprioception. Proprioception was measured with a Biodex System 3 Pro Multijoint System® isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Inc, Shirley / NY, USA).
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment
Walking parameters
Time Frame: At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.
Evaluate their effects on walking parameters. The walking parameters of the patients were obtained with a 3-dimensional motion analysis system consisting of 6 high-speed (100 ps) cameras (Elite System, BTS S.p.A, Milan, Italy).
At the beginning of treatment, at the 4th, 16th and 28th weeks after the start of treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bilal Uysal, Balikesir University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe