- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06267456
The Reliability of ULRT in Overhead Athletes and Its Relationship With Selected UEPT
February 27, 2024 updated by: Birgül Dıngırdan, Hacettepe University
The Reliability of Upper Extremity Rotation Test in Overhead Athletes and Its Relationship With Selected Upper Extremity Performance Tests
Upper Extremity Rotation Test is a new test the evaluates 90-90 position, which is one of the requirements for overhead throwing.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of the Upper Extremity Rotation Test in overhead athletes and the relationship between the Closed Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test and the Upper Quarter Y Balance Test.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Upper Extremity Rotation Test is a new test the evaluates 90-90 position, which is one of the requirements for overhead throwing.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of the Upper Extremity Rotation Test in overhead athletes and the relationship between the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test and the Upper Quarter Y Balance Test.
Upper Extremity Rotation Test was found to be reliable in overhead athletes.
Upper Extremity Rotation Test showed high reliability in overhead atheletes.
There was no correlation between the Upper Exremity Rotation Test and the Upper Quarter Y Balance Test.
A moderate corelation was found between the Upper Extremity Rotation Test and Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
48
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey
- Hacettepe University
-
-
İzmit
-
Kocaeli, İzmit, Turkey
- Birgül Dıngırdan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-30 years
- Continuing sports for at least three years for each group (volleyball, handball, baskeball)
- Athletes training at least three days per week.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals experiencing difficulty understanding what the physiotherapist says.
- Having a history of orthopedic surgery within the last year
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: handball players
Handball players aged between 18 and 35 who have been playing for a minimum of 3 years.
|
The athlete is positioned with the shoulder, elbow lateral epicondyle, greater trochanter, and ankle lateral malleolus in contact with the wall.
In the push-up position, the elbows are started at shoulder height with a 90° bend, and the feet are placed in a shoulder-width apart position.
Athletes are instructed to perform a rotation of the shoulder and trunk by touching a vertically placed band on the wall for 15 seconds in the position of 90° abduction and 90° external rotation of the shoulder.
The tested side is the upper extremity where the closed kinetic chain position is maintained.
Athletes were placed in a push-up position with a distance of 91.44 centimeters (cm) (3 feet) between their hands for the test position.
Subsequently, they were instructed to touch one hand to the other as quickly as possible.
The total number of touches within a 15-second period was recorded.
Modified push-up position was used for women, and regular push-up position for men during this time.
Prior to the test, a familiarization trial consisting of 5 repetitions was performed.
The test was then repeated 3 times, and the average of these repetitions was recorded as the score.
Individuals were given a 45-second rest period between repetitions.
The normalized score, representing the touch count per individual's height, was calculated.
The power score was obtained by multiplying the touch count by 68% of the individual's body weight in kilograms.
The Upper Extremity Y Balance Test was created using three rulers placed on the ground in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
The rulers in the superolateral and inferolateral directions were positioned at a 90° angle to each other, while the ruler in the medial direction was placed at a 135° angle with respect to these two directions.
In this test, both arms started in a push-up position with shoulder-width apart.
The athlete was then instructed to touch, using their non-dominant hand, the maximum reachable point in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
|
Other: volleyball players
volleyball players aged between 18 and 35 who have been playing for a minimum of 3 years.
|
The athlete is positioned with the shoulder, elbow lateral epicondyle, greater trochanter, and ankle lateral malleolus in contact with the wall.
In the push-up position, the elbows are started at shoulder height with a 90° bend, and the feet are placed in a shoulder-width apart position.
Athletes are instructed to perform a rotation of the shoulder and trunk by touching a vertically placed band on the wall for 15 seconds in the position of 90° abduction and 90° external rotation of the shoulder.
The tested side is the upper extremity where the closed kinetic chain position is maintained.
Athletes were placed in a push-up position with a distance of 91.44 centimeters (cm) (3 feet) between their hands for the test position.
Subsequently, they were instructed to touch one hand to the other as quickly as possible.
The total number of touches within a 15-second period was recorded.
Modified push-up position was used for women, and regular push-up position for men during this time.
Prior to the test, a familiarization trial consisting of 5 repetitions was performed.
The test was then repeated 3 times, and the average of these repetitions was recorded as the score.
Individuals were given a 45-second rest period between repetitions.
The normalized score, representing the touch count per individual's height, was calculated.
The power score was obtained by multiplying the touch count by 68% of the individual's body weight in kilograms.
The Upper Extremity Y Balance Test was created using three rulers placed on the ground in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
The rulers in the superolateral and inferolateral directions were positioned at a 90° angle to each other, while the ruler in the medial direction was placed at a 135° angle with respect to these two directions.
In this test, both arms started in a push-up position with shoulder-width apart.
The athlete was then instructed to touch, using their non-dominant hand, the maximum reachable point in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
|
Other: basketball players
Basketball aged between 18 and 35 who have been playing for a minimum of 3 years.
|
The athlete is positioned with the shoulder, elbow lateral epicondyle, greater trochanter, and ankle lateral malleolus in contact with the wall.
In the push-up position, the elbows are started at shoulder height with a 90° bend, and the feet are placed in a shoulder-width apart position.
Athletes are instructed to perform a rotation of the shoulder and trunk by touching a vertically placed band on the wall for 15 seconds in the position of 90° abduction and 90° external rotation of the shoulder.
The tested side is the upper extremity where the closed kinetic chain position is maintained.
Athletes were placed in a push-up position with a distance of 91.44 centimeters (cm) (3 feet) between their hands for the test position.
Subsequently, they were instructed to touch one hand to the other as quickly as possible.
The total number of touches within a 15-second period was recorded.
Modified push-up position was used for women, and regular push-up position for men during this time.
Prior to the test, a familiarization trial consisting of 5 repetitions was performed.
The test was then repeated 3 times, and the average of these repetitions was recorded as the score.
Individuals were given a 45-second rest period between repetitions.
The normalized score, representing the touch count per individual's height, was calculated.
The power score was obtained by multiplying the touch count by 68% of the individual's body weight in kilograms.
The Upper Extremity Y Balance Test was created using three rulers placed on the ground in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
The rulers in the superolateral and inferolateral directions were positioned at a 90° angle to each other, while the ruler in the medial direction was placed at a 135° angle with respect to these two directions.
In this test, both arms started in a push-up position with shoulder-width apart.
The athlete was then instructed to touch, using their non-dominant hand, the maximum reachable point in the medial, inferolateral, and superolateral directions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The reliability of Upper Extremity Rotation Test
Time Frame: January 2022
|
The reliability of the Upper Extremity Rotation Test was evaluated.
|
January 2022
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Relationship Assessment of the Upper Extremity Rotation Test
Time Frame: February 2022
|
The relationship between the Upper Extremity Rotation Test and the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test and Upper Quarter Y Balance Test was evaluated.
|
February 2022
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Birgül Dıngırdan, Master's, Sakarya Applied Sciences University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
January 10, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 12, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 28, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 27, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- HÜ- FTR- BD- 01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Asymmetry
-
Infinite Biomedical TechnologiesUnited States Department of Defense; University of AlbertaRecruitingAmputation | Upper LimbCanada
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingUpper Limb AmputeesUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedUpper Limb AmputationUnited States
-
University of South FloridaFlorida High Tech Corridor Council; TRS, Inc.CompletedUpper Limb AmputationUnited States
-
Minia UniversityCompleted
-
Louis Stokes VA Medical CenterUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingAmputation | Prosthesis User | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow (Injury)United States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationUnknownUpper Limb AmputeesIsrael
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Orthocare Innovations, LLCNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...RecruitingStroke | Upper Limb Amputation | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Central Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Peripheral Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Nerve Reconstruction | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Tendon Transfer SurgeryUnited States
-
Infinite Biomedical TechnologiesJohns Hopkins University; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation | Upper LimbUnited States
Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Rotation Test
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedSports Physical TherapyTurkey
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompletedMotor DisordersBrazil
-
Thomas More KempenOrtho-MedicoUnknown
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
University Hospital, BrestCompleted
-
Federal University of BahiaUnknownChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseBrazil
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Upper Extremity Paralysis | TetraplegiaUnited Kingdom
-
D'Or Institute for Research and EducationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Conselho Nacional... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
University of Sao PauloUnknown
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedDuchenne Muscular Dystrophy | Upper Limb Function | Respiratory Function Test