- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02136238
Functional Performance of Voluntary Opening and Closing Body Powered Prostheses
A Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Performance of Voluntary Opening and Closing Body Powered Prosthetic Terminal Devices
This study will compare the functional performance of voluntary opening (VO) and voluntary closing (VC) body powered prostheses. We hypothesize that the ability to sense cable tension and produce progressively higher pinch from shoulder force will result in advantages for the VC terminal device (TRS, Grip 3) in terms of proprioception and overall function. The specific aims of this clinical trial are to:
- Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in reduced compensatory motion during activity.
- Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in improved function in activities of daily living.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
- University of South Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria
- Unilateral transradial or wrist-disarticulation amputee
- 18 to 85 years of age
- At least 1 year from date of amputation
- Be able to independently provide informed consent
- Be willing to comply with study procedures Exclusion criteria
- History of acute or chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb
- Prosthetic socket adjustment within 90 days
- Any condition that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. shoulder impingement, sub-acromial bursitis, severe arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or fingers)
- Injuries of the upper limb within the past 90 days (surgeries, sprains, strains, or fractures).
- Unwillingness/inability to follow instructions Inclusion criteria for able-bodied subjects
- 18 to 85 years of age
- Able to provide independent, informed consent
- Independent function by self-report
- Free of any health ailment that would impair physical function Exclusion criteria for able-bodied subjects
- Younger than 18 or older than 85 years of age
- Any condition that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. shoulder impingement, sub-acromial bursitis, severe arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or fingers)
- No injuries of the upper limb within the past 90 days (surgeries, sprains, strains, or fractures).
- Unwillingness/inability to follow instructions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Non-amputee controls
This was an observational arm including non-amputees who were assessed as non-impaired control subjects.
There are no interventions in this observational arm of the study.
|
|
Active Comparator: Prosthetic hand 1 (Hosmer 5XA)
This arm of the study included unilateral transradial amputees who who were assessed while using prosthetic hand 1
|
Voluntary opening prosthetic terminal device ("hand")
|
Active Comparator: Prosthetic hand 2 (TRS Grip 3)
This arm of the study included unilateral transradial amputees who who were assessed while using prosthetic hand 2
|
Voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device ("hand")
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding Task
Time Frame: Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.
|
Distance sternum is displaced while folding a towel was measured in meters.
|
Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.
|
Physical Function Performance 10 Test Score
Time Frame: Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.
|
Simulation of 10 activities of daily living (i.e.
donning a shirt, sweeping, walking stairs).
Measured in units of time, distance and mass to provide a singular, continuous scaled score of function (from 0-100).
A score of 100 is the maximal score and indicates the highest level of independent function where a score of 0 indicates the poorest score.
Persons scoring lower scores will likely be at increased risk of dependency with daily function.
|
Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jason Highsmith, PhD, University of South Florida
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro0013189
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Amputation
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Active, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.WithdrawnAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Limb; Absence, Congenital, Upper
-
Louis Stokes VA Medical CenterUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingAmputation | Prosthesis User | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow (Injury)United States
-
Infinite Biomedical TechnologiesCompleted
-
Infinite Biomedical TechnologiesJohns Hopkins University; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation | Upper LimbUnited States
-
IntegrumThe Swedish Research Council; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; Chalmers... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Infinite Biomedical TechnologiesUnited States Department of Defense; University of AlbertaRecruitingAmputation | Upper LimbCanada
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedUpper Limb AmputationUnited States
-
University of ManitobaRehabilitation Centre for Children, CanadaNot yet recruitingPediatric | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation | Amniotic Band Syndrome
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Össur EhfCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Limb; Absence, Congenital, UpperUnited States