Imaging the Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Stimulation and Motor Training After Stroke.

December 9, 2019 updated by: D'Or Institute for Research and Education

Neuroplasticity Following Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Training in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be used to investigate neural correlates of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. For this purpose, patients included will be submitted to 10 sessions with active or sham bihemispheric tDCS associated with intensive and individualized rehabilitation. Neuroimage will be employed before and after the intervention to investigate neural correlates of expected changes in motor function.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 22281100
        • Recruiting
        • D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic Stroke (> 12 months)
  • Upper limb sensorimotor sequelae due to stroke affecting only one cerebral hemisphere
  • The structural integrity of the corpus callosum sensorimotor
  • Showing ability to perform some movement with the paretic upper limb: at least minimal active mobility of the wrist and two fingers of the paretic hand.
  • Score ≥ 18 at Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Score ≥ 4 at Ashworth Scale
  • MRI or tDCS contraindications (cardiac pacemakers; implanted medication pumps; cochlear, or eye implants; craniotomy, skin lesions at the site of stimulation; surgical clips in or near the brain; claustrophobia, history of seizures, permanent makeup or tattoos with metallic dyes…)
  • Prior neurological diseases
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Pregnancy
  • Traumatic or orthopedic lesion limiting the range of upper limb motion
  • Severe comprehension deficits, apraxia or neglect that would interfere with performing the study tasks
  • Score > 59 at the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: tDCS
Bihemispheric tDCS will be applied. The anode will be placed on the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be positioned over the unaffected hemisphere. After stimulation, individual and intensive upper limb rehabilitation will be performed.
Stimulation will be applied for 20 minutes by a DC stimulator (NeuroConn, Germany). During each stimulation section, a pair of saline-soaked sponge electrodes (surface 24 cm²) will be placed over C3 and C4, according to the International 10-20 EEG system. Stimulation intensity will be 2 mA with current ramping up and down of 10 seconds each. The stimulation will be followed by 40 minutes of upper limb rehabilitation. Experimental sessions will be repeated five times per week to complete 10 sessions.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control
Bihemispheric sham tDCS will be applied. The anode will be placed on the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be positioned over the unaffected hemisphere. After sham stimulation, individual and intensive upper limb rehabilitation will be performed.
Sham stimulation will be applied for 20 minutes by a DC stimulator (NeuroConn, Germany). During each sham stimulation section, a pair of saline-soaked sponge electrodes (surface 24 cm²) will be placed over C3 and C4, according to the International 10-20 EEG system. The anode will be placed to the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be positioned over the unaffected hemisphere. Sham tDCS will be performed by ramping current flow for the first 10 seconds of stimulation, but switching the stimulator off automatically after 30 seconds. The sham stimulation will be followed by 40 minutes of upper limb rehabilitation. Experimental sessions will be repeated five times per week to complete 10 sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment-related changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment)
Brain functional changes from baseline to post-treatment
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment)
Treatment-related changes in white matter
Time Frame: pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment)
Brain structural (white matter) changes from baseline to post-treatment
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Fugl-Meyer assessment of paretic upper limb motor function
Time Frame: pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment); 30 days follow up (30 days after completing treatment) and 90 days follow up (90 days after completing treatment)
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) Scale of Motor Impairment scores changes from baseline to post-treatment, 30 and 90 days later (follow up).
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment); 30 days follow up (30 days after completing treatment) and 90 days follow up (90 days after completing treatment)
Changes in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test scores
Time Frame: pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment), follow-up 30 days, follow-up 90 days
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) Scale of Motor Impairment scores changes from baseline to post-treatment and in subsequent follow-up
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment), follow-up 30 days, follow-up 90 days
Changes in Stroke Impact Scale scores
Time Frame: pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment), follow-up 30 days, follow-up 90 days
Stroke Impact Scale scores changes from baseline to post-treatment and in subsequent follow-up
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (from 3 to 7 days after the end of the treatment), follow-up 30 days, follow-up 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Fernanda F Tovar-Moll, PhD, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR)
  • Principal Investigator: Erika C Rodrigues, PhD, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 29, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on tDCS + upper limb rehabilitation

Subscribe