Multidimensional Evaluation of Patients' Affected by Obstructive Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) Before and After Ventilotherapy (MULTI-OSAS)

March 8, 2024 updated by: Istituto Auxologico Italiano

This observational study aims to evaluate multiple dimensions of health in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS), before and after three weeks of ventilotherapy.

Specifically, the study aims to identify pre- vs post-treatment differences in the following domains:

  • cognitive performance
  • blood expression of biomarkers related to neurodegeneration
  • psychosocial wellbeing

Thus, patients will complete the following evaluations before (T0) and after (T1) ventilotherapy:

  • neuropsychological standard assessment
  • blood sampling
  • psychosocial self-reported questionnaires

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome is associated with cognitive difficulties, low psychosocial wellbeing and quality of life; however, the possible beneficial contribution of ventilotherapy on these dimensions is not completely clear. Ventilotherapy restores brain oxygenation and improve rest, possibly increasing cognitive performances, psychosocial health and quality of life. Multidisciplinary approaches to the treatment of OSAS are rare, although recommended. Solid proof of OSAS comorbidities may encourage clinicians to adopt a holistic perspective of care, leading to better rehabilitative outcomes. Also, evidence of the beneficial effects of ventilotherapy could increase patients' compliance to ventilotherapy, which is generally low.

The study aims to evaluate multiple dimensions of patient's health before and after three weeks of ventilotherapy, focusing on the cognitive performance, the blood expression of biomarkers related to neurodegeneration, and individual's psychosocial wellbeing.

Overall, it is expected improved cognitive performances and psychosocial wellbeing after ventilotherapy. Also, a reduction in the blood expression of biomarkers related to neurodegeneration (if found before the treatment) is hypothesized, although the limited research in this field requires cautious predictions.

Comprehensive evidence about OSAS comorbidity, beyond breath and sleep difficulties, is mandatory to design innovative multidisciplinary rehabilitative approaches in line with a holistic perspective of care. Effective multidisciplinary approaches are considered the gold standard in medical care, leading to better treatment outcomes and higher patients' satisfaction.

Beyond the clear ethical implication of providing higher quality of treatment, multidisciplinary interventions also imply a shared responsibility of treatment, preventing from clinical misjudgments and professionals' burnout.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

65

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • VCO
      • Piancavallo, VCO, Italy, 28824
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individual affected by OSAS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OSAS diagnosis (AHI > 5)
  • handedness: right

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous ventilotherapy
  • neurological and/or neurodegenerative conditions
  • Personality disorders, autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis
  • sleep disorders comorbidities (eg., narcolepsy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall cognitive functioning
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA (score range: 0-30; higher scores indicate higher cognitive functioning)
baseline and after 3 weeks
Selective attention
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Multiple Features Target Cancellation (MFTC) test (accuracy score range from 0 to 1; higher score suggest better performance)
baseline and after 3 weeks
Memory and learning
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Selective Reminding Test - SRT: three scores are provided. 1) long term memory storage capacity (0-72), learning (0-72), delayed recall (0-12). Higher scores indicate better performance.
baseline and after 3 weeks
Visuo-spatial abilities
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Rey Figure - copy: test score range from 0 to 36, higher scores indicate better performance
baseline and after 3 weeks
Inhibition
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Stroop Test: higher time scores and error scores indicate worst inhibitory control
baseline and after 3 weeks
Planning
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Tower of London - ToL: higher time score ( 0-36) and accuracy score (0-36) indicate better performance
baseline and after 3 weeks
Decision making
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Balloon Analog Risk Task - BART (test score)
baseline and after 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biomarkers of neurodegeneration
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
blood concentration (pg/ml)
baseline and after 3 weeks
psychosocial wellbeing and satisfaction
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Psychological General Well-Being Index (i.e., test scores)
baseline and after 3 weeks
Quality of life (perceived psycho-physical and socio-economic wellbeing and satisfaction)
Time Frame: baseline and after 3 weeks
Quality of Life Scale: 16-items self-report scored from 1 - terrible to 7 - delighted (score range 16-112); higher score indicate higher wellbeing and satisfaction.
baseline and after 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Disorder

Clinical Trials on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilotherapy

3
Subscribe