- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04560595
Remote Guided Caffeine Reduction
January 10, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
The purpose of this online research study is to determine whether or not a gradual caffeine reduction program developed at Johns Hopkins can help people reduce their caffeine use.
The investigators will provide materials to help guide caffeine reduction and ask questions to track caffeine use over several weeks.
The investigators will also assess how reducing caffeine may benefit common caffeine-related problems such as anxiety, sleep disturbances, and gastrointestinal distress.
The study will also determine whether or not people like participating in this caffeine reduction program in an online format.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
- Sleep Disorder
- Diarrhea
- Anxiety Disorders
- Insomnia
- Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
- Anxiety
- Sleep Disturbance
- Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
- Heartburn
- Caffeine
- Caffeine Withdrawal
- Caffeine; Sleep Disorder
- Caffeine Dependence
- Caffeine-Induced Anxiety Disorder
- Caffeine-Induced Sleep Disorder, Without Use Disorder
- Caffeine Abuse
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There is emerging evidence that some individuals have difficulty cutting down or eliminating caffeine consumption in spite of clinically significant problems exacerbated by caffeine use.
This study will evaluate whether a caffeine reduction program developed at Johns Hopkins can help people reduce their caffeine use in an online format.
Volunteers will participate in an intervention study conducted entirely online, including video visits for screening, instructions for caffeine reduction, and follow up.
The study also involves filling out online surveys sent via email and text message.
During screening, participants will be asked questions about their personal characteristics including demographic information, weekly caffeine consumption, and general medical history.
Participants who are determined to be eligible after screening will be randomized to either the immediate or delayed treatment group.
Those in the immediate treatment group will have their next session immediately after screening while those in the delayed treatment group will have their next session 7 weeks after screening.
At this session, participants receive a digital copy of a caffeine reduction manual and instructions on how to gradually cut down caffeine.
After this, participants will complete weekly online surveys over six weeks.
Participants will complete two follow-up video visits at 7 and 14 weeks after participants received the caffeine reduction instructions.
The investigators will measure caffeine consumption over time using the online surveys and interview questions during video visits, and the investigators will also measure how various caffeine related problems may improve during caffeine reduction, such as sleep problems, gastrointestinal issues, and anxiety.
During the end of study sessions, participants will answer questions related to acceptability of the online format and report on participants' current caffeine use.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
109
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-75 years old
- Reside in the United States
- Read, write, and speak English fluently
- Able to access a video camera on a smart phone, tablet, or other computer
- Able to receive text messages or emails (or both)
- Suitable caffeine consumption
- Indicate suitable reason for caffeine reduction
- Interested in getting help to gradually reduce or eliminate caffeine consumption as part of a research study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any current medical or psychiatric disorder or symptoms that, in the opinion of the investigators, may interfere with or preclude completion of the study [many psychiatric or medical concerns such as insomnia or anxiety are not anticipated to interfere with study participation and will not generally be exclusionary]
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Caffeine Reduction Manual, Immediate Treatment Group
Weekly caffeine consumption is to be measured before and after using the caffeine reduction program, which has been summarized in a "Guide to Caffeine Reduction and Cessation" manual to help people reduce their caffeine use.
Those in the immediate treatment group will receive the guide immediately after screening.
|
We will provide participants with a Guide to Caffeine Reduction and Cessation in order to help the reduce their caffeine use and determine their ratings of treatment acceptability.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Caffeine Reduction Manual, Delayed Treatment Group
Weekly caffeine consumption is to be measured before and after using the caffeine reduction program, which has been summarized in a "Guide to Caffeine Reduction and Cessation" manual to help people reduce their caffeine use.
Those in the delayed treatment group will receive the guide seven weeks after screening.
|
We will provide participants with a Guide to Caffeine Reduction and Cessation in order to help the reduce their caffeine use and determine their ratings of treatment acceptability.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants With Completed Assessments
Time Frame: Treatment Visit, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine to what extent participants will engage with a remote caffeine reduction intervention for caffeine-related problems and find it acceptable, we will calculate the percentage of completed assessments for each video visit among eligible participants.
|
Treatment Visit, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Treatment Acceptability as Assessed by Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 7 weeks Follow-Up visit
|
At the 7 Weeks Follow-Up video visit, we will use an internally-developed standardized treatment acceptability questionnaire to determine self-reported agreement with two items on the treatment acceptability survey (i.e., "Overall, was the Guide to Caffeine Reduction and Cessation easy to use?", and "Overall, was the guide to Caffeine reduction and Cessation helpful?").
Each question is scored on a scale from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-6, where lower scores indicate less acceptability (e.g., 0=not at all easy, not at all helpful; 3 = very easy, very helpful).
|
7 weeks Follow-Up visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Caffeine Consumption (in Milligrams)
Time Frame: Baseline, Treatment Visit, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine to what extent participants are successfully able to reduce their caffeine consumption following the remote intervention, we will assess caffeine consumption as determined by the standardized caffeine assessments at 7 week post-treatment follow-ups and compare this with consumption at the screening televisit.
Based on participant responses to the number, type, and amount of caffeinated beverages, caffeine consumption is calculated at each assessment in milligrams (mg).
|
Baseline, Treatment Visit, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Caffeine-related Problems as Assessed by Past-7 Days Standardized Items
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine to what extent participants report improvement in common caffeine-related problems following the remote intervention, we have developed a standardized 19-Item Caffeine Use Disorder measure of the extent to which common problems related to excessive caffeine consumption bothered participants within the past 7 days, e.g., "During the past 7 days, I have consumed caffeine in larger amounts or over a longer period than I intended."
Participants rate the extent to which these problems bothered them on a scale from 0-3 where 0 = not at all a problem and 3 = major problem.
The total possible scale range is from 0-57 (because the scores of 0-3 are summed for the 19 items).
Higher sum scores on the measure indicate greater caffeine-related problems.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Anxiety as Assessed by the PROMIS-Anxiety-8a
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in day-to-day anxiety, we will utilize the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 8a assessment.
The questionnaire asks the extent to which anxiety-related items affected the participants over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always) with a total raw score range of 8-40 in which higher scores reflect greater anxiety.
Raw scores are then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.
For negatively-worded concepts like anxiety, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average.
By comparison, an anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.
A score of less than 55 is none to slight, 55.0-59.9 is mild, 60.0-69.9 is moderate, and 70 and over is severe.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Anxiety as Assessed by the GAD-7
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in day-to-day anxiety, we will utilize the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).
The GAD-7 consists of items asking the participant to rate on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) the extent they have experienced anxiety related symptoms.
The scoring range is 0-21 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety related symptoms.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Sleep Problems as Assessed by the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in sleep problems, we will utilize the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a assessment.
The questionnaire asks the extent to which sleep-related items affected the participants over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
The raw scoring range is 8-40 and higher scores reflect greater sleep disturbance.
Raw scores are then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.
For negatively-worded concepts like sleep disturbance, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average.
By comparison, T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.
A T-score of 50 or above is often considered a clinically significant level of sleep disturbance.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Sleep Problems as Assessed by the PSQI
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in sleep problems, we will utilize the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which contains 19 self-rated items and 7 sub-scales for different components where a score of 0 indicates no difficulty and a score of 3 indicates severe difficulty.
The scoring range is 0-21 and higher global scores indicate greater sleep difficulties.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Gastrointestinal Problems as Assessed by the PROMIS Reflux-13a
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in gastrointestinal problems, we will utilize the PROMIS Reflux-13a.
These items ask the extent to which gastrointestinal-related items affected the participants over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always).
The scoring range of raw scores is 13-65 and higher scores reflect greater gastrointestinal problems.
Raw scores are then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.
For negatively-worded concepts like reflux, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average.
By comparison, an anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Gastrointestinal Problems as Assessed by the GSRS
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in gastrointestinal problems, we will utilize the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) which consists of 15 items describing gastrointestinal distress where responses range from 0 (no discomfort at all) to 6 (very severe discomfort).
The scoring range is 0-90 and higher scores indicate more severe gastrointestinal symptoms.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Change in Gastrointestinal Problems as Assessed by the PROMIS Diarrhea-6a
Time Frame: Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
To determine whether caffeine reduction is accompanied by a reduction in gastrointestinal problems, we will utilize the PROMIS Diarrhea-6a.
These items ask the extent to which gastrointestinal-related items affected the participants over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always).
The raw scoring range is 6-30 and higher scores reflect greater gastrointestinal problems.
Raw scores are then translated into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.
For negatively-worded concepts like diarrhea, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average.
By comparison, an anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.
|
Baseline, 7-Week Follow-Up, 14-Week Follow-Up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dustin Lee, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 10, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 23, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 10, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
- Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic
- Dyssomnias
- Anxiety Disorders
- Parasomnias
- Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
- Sleep Wake Disorders
- Diarrhea
- Heartburn
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Purinergic Antagonists
- Purinergic Agents
- Central Nervous System Stimulants
- Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
- Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists
- Caffeine
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00250925
- R01DA003890 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
There is not currently a plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sleep Disorder
-
Matrouh UniversitySuez Canal University; Beni-Suef University; University of Bisha, Saudia ArabiaCompletedSleep Disorder | Sleep Hygiene | Sleep Disorder; Insomnia Type | Sleep Disorder in Elderly | Sleep Disorder, Mental Health | Sleep Disorders, Physical HealthEgypt
-
University of ManitobaRecruitingSleepwalking | Sleep Terror | Nightmare Disorder | REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD) | Confusional ArousalCanada
-
University of UtahRecruitingREM Sleep Behavior Disorder | Nightmare | Nightmare Disorder With Associated Other Sleep DisorderUnited States
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzRecruitingSleep Disorder | Restless Legs Syndrome | Insomnia | Sleep Apnea | Narcolepsy | Idiopathic Hypersomnia | Somnambulism | Sleep Disorder Parasomnia | REM Behavior DisorderGermany
-
Yale UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedCircadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder, UnspecifiedUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Active, not recruitingRapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior DisorderUnited States
-
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingRapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder
-
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de BellvitgeIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Hospital Universitari de BellvitgeNot yet recruitingInsomnia | Major Depressive DisorderSpain
-
Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesUniversity of Minnesota; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center; The Geneva... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPTSD | Insomnia | Nightmare | TBI | REM Behavior Disorder | Sleep Disorder (Disorder)United States
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedDyssomnias | Sleep Disorders | Mental Disorder | Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorder; Elderly | Sleep Disorder, Intrinsic
Clinical Trials on Caffeine Reduction Manual
-
United States Naval Medical Center, San DiegoUniversity of California, San Francisco; TriService Nursing Research ProgramCompletedPerceived StressUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteNot yet recruitingPremature Birth | Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia | Apnea of Prematurity | Preterm Labor With Preterm Delivery
-
University of RochesterNot yet recruitingInfants | Neonatal Apnea
-
University of New MexicoPfizerTerminated
-
University of VermontCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCaffeine Use Disorder (DSM-5 Condition for Further Study)United States
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Fracture | Virtual Plan of Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Northumbria UniversityCompletedExercise | Dietary SupplementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Wen-Shiou PanCompletedHeart Failure | Stroke | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | Kidney Failure, Chronic | Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset | Kidney Failure, Acute | Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation | Chronic Liver Disease and CirrhosisTaiwan
-
Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingTibial Fractures | Epiphyseal Fracture