Ultrasonic Scaler VS Erythritol for Peri-implant Maintenance of Loaded Implants With Crowns Made by Different Materials

April 5, 2025 updated by: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

Ultrasonic Scaler VS Erythritol for Peri-implant Maintenance of Loaded Implants With Crowns Made by Different Materials: 12-months Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to assess the effect of a 12-month peri-implant protocol with erythritol orultrasonic scaler with peek inserts for dental implants with crowns made by different materials .

Patients will be randomly divided into two groups:

Erythritol group: erythritol with a particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS) Ultrasonic scaler group: a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI EMS) .

Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant.

The mechanical debridement appointments will be carried out at the baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Control Record.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardy
      • Pavia, Lombardy, Italy, 27100
        • Unit of Dental Hygiene - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatrics - University of Pavia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 70
  • Presence of at least one dental implant
  • Good compliance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cardiac stimulators
  • Patients with neurological disorders
  • Patients with psychological disorders
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erythritol group
erythritol with particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS)
Active Comparator: Ultrasonic scaler
ultrasonic scaler, a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI, EMS) will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Probing Depth (PD)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)
Evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe. 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal.
Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of gingival bleeding during a probing with a dichotomous scoring (yes/no) of bleeding sites. The sum of the bleeding sites is divided for the total sites and multiplied per 100.
Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)
Change in Plaque Control Record
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)
% assessment of the amount of plaque on dental surfaces; it is detected on 4 surfaces: distal, mesial, vestibular, lingual / palatal. The number of sites with plaque is divided by the total number of sites available in the mouth and multiplied by 100. Results indicate the index as a percentage.
Baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon motivated request to Principal Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-implant Mucositis

Clinical Trials on Erythritol prophylactic powders

Subscribe