Clinical Comparison of the Stain Removal Efficacy of Two Air Polishing Powders

May 2, 2017 updated by: Mahidol University
This study was designed to find out the stain removal efficacy and also, to find out the operators and patients opinion when use or receive treatment with both air polishing powders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Using air polishing with sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 65 µm provides efficacy in the removal of dental stains but it can cause gingival trauma if used towards the gingiva. Since having big size particles is uncomfortable, the current recommendation according to literature is to use a smaller grain size (40 µm) that results in more patient comfort. However, the efficacy of small grain size on stain removal has not been studied adequately. This study aimed to compare the stain removal efficacy between sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 65 µm and 40 µm and also to evaluate patient's acceptance after treatment and operator's opinion after using both air polishing powders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Kanyawat Rattanasuwan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy subjects who aged over 18 years old.
  2. Subjects who have healthy periodontal health or gingivitis.
  3. At least 3 upper teeth (anterior, premolar and molar) are presented on both side (right & left side), which will be refer as index teeth, that did not present with any gingival recession, cervical abrasion and/or abfraction, caries, restoration or orthodontic appliance.
  4. Intrinsic stain is not present.
  5. Index teeth are presented with extrinsic stain with individual Lobene score scored 2 or above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy or current breastfeeding mother.
  2. Allergy to sodium bicarbonate or the aroma of the powder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: sodium bicarbonate powders (65 µm)
sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 65 µm
sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 65 µm
Other Names:
  • sodium bicarbonate powders
EXPERIMENTAL: sodium bicarbonate powders (40 µm)
sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 40 µm
sodium bicarbonate powders with grain size 40 µm
Other Names:
  • sodium bicarbonate powders

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time required for complete removal of extrinsic stains
Time Frame: 2 hr
Comparison of the time required for the complete removal of extrinsic stains by sodium bicarbonate powders with a grain size of 65 µm and 40 µm
2 hr

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient acceptance
Time Frame: 2 hr
The answers from the questionnaires about the clinical impressions of patients after treatment with sodium bicarbonate powders with a grain size of 65 µm and 40 µm
2 hr
Operator opinion
Time Frame: 2 hr
The answers from the questionnaires about the operators' opinions after using of sodium bicarbonate powders with a grain size of 65 µm and 40 µm
2 hr

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015/DT035

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stain Removal Efficacy

Subscribe