A Study on the Efficacy of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Lung Cancer

September 2, 2025 updated by: Yu Zhang, Jinzhou Medical University

A Clinical Investigation on the Efficacy of Leuprorelin Acetate (Androgen Deprivation Therapy) Combined With Sintilimab (Anti-PD-1) in Advanced Lung Cancer

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) triggers thymic revitalization and increases thymic output, enhancing baseline anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapies. Anti-tumor synergism has been identified by combining ADT with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for androgen-independent tumors. This study is to investigate the combination of Leuprorelin ADT and Sintilimab (anti-PD-1) therapy in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) are widely used in the clinical treatment of lung cancer. Studies have shown that the quantity and function of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors in treating advanced NSCLC. The thymus is crucial for the differentiation, development, and maturation of T cells. With age, thymic atrophy leads to immunosenescence, significantly affecting baseline anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapies. Preliminary findings have indicated that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) not only directly induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells but also may exert anti-tumor effects by promoting thymic regeneration. Furthermore, anti-tumor synergism has been identified by combining ADT with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for androgen-independent tumors. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the combination of Leuprorelin ADT and Sintilimab (anti-PD-1) therapy in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Shuangning Yang
  • Phone Number: (86)15138955506

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Oncology Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
          • Shuangning Yang
          • Phone Number: (86)15138955506
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Liping Wang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

3.Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male patients aged ≥60 years.
  2. ECOG performance status score of 0 ~1.
  3. Expected survival time of more than 3 months.
  4. Histologically or cytologically diagnosed advanced lung cancer according to the TNM staging system established by AJCC.
  5. Patients who have not previously received any anti-PD-1 treatment.
  6. Patients with adequate bone marrow function, no significant hepatic, renal, or coagulation dysfunction as per laboratory test criteria.
  7. At least one tumor lesion meeting the following criteria:

    • No prior local treatments such as radiotherapy
    • Not biopsied during the screening period (if biopsy needed, baseline tumor assessment at least 14 days after the screening biopsy).
    • Measurable at baseline (longest diameter of the lesion ≥10 mm; For a lymph node, short diameter ≥15 mm).
    • If only one measurable lesion, no prior local treatments such as radiotherapy.
  8. Ability to understand and voluntarily sign a written informed consent form.
  9. Willingness to follow the study protocol and follow-up examinations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion of cases that do not meet the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Treatment Group
40 cases in this group to receive the standard conventional treatment (Chemotherapy + PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody)
PD-1 inhibitor
Other Names:
  • Anti-PD-1 monoclonal
Experimental: Conventional Treatment Combined with Leuprolide Group
40 cases in this group to receive the standard conventional therapy (Chemotherapy + PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) combined with Leuprorelin acetate, 3.75 mg
Leuprolide, an FDA-approved GnRH agonist, reduces sex hormone production and is widely used in clinical practice.
Other Names:
  • Leuprolide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Disappearance of all target lesions, with nodular diseases excluded and target nodules reduced to <10mm in short axis.
Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Number of Participants with Partial Response (PR)
Time Frame: Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Reduction of at least 30% in the sum of diameters of all measurable target lesions compared to baseline
Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Number of Participants with Disease Progression (PD)
Time Frame: Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
A 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of all measurable target lesions over the entire study period (using the smallest baseline value if it is the smallest), coupled with an absolute increase in the sum of diameters of at least 5mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered disease progression.
Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Number of Participants with Stable Disease (SD)
Time Frame: Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Lesion reduction not meeting PR criteria nor sufficient increase for PD, falling in between these two endpoints. The minimum sum of diameters during the study period can be used as a reference.
Efficacy evaluations are scheduled at 6 weeks,12 weeks and 18 weeks post treatment
Quantity of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
Time Frame: Laboratory evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment
Assessment of peripheral blood lymphocyte quantity, comparing patients before and after a treatment cycle
Laboratory evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment
Composition of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
Time Frame: Laboratory evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment.
Assessment of peripheral blood lymphocyte composition, comparing patients before and after a treatment cycle
Laboratory evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment.
Status of Recent Thymic Emigrants (RTEs)
Time Frame: Evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment.
Assessment of the status of Recent Thymic Emigrants (RTEs), comparing patients before and after a treatment cycle
Evaluations are scheduled before treatment, at 3 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 weeks post-treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yu Zhang, Professor, Jinzhou Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We currently do not plan to share individual patient data (IPD) with other researchers due to confidentiality concerns and ethical restrictions. Additionally, the data collected in this study are considered proprietary and are crucial for ongoing and future research projects.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NSCLC, Stage III

Clinical Trials on Sintilimab

Subscribe