- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06530355
Comparison of the Non-Dominant Hands of Pianists and the Dominant Hands of Individuals Who Do Not Play Instruments
December 14, 2025 updated by: Duygu Şahin Altaç, Halic University
Comparison of the Non-Dominant Hands of Pianists and the Dominant Hands of Individuals Who Do Not Play Instruments in Terms of Skills and Reaction Time
The aim of this study is to compare the non-dominant hands of pianists with the dominant hands of individuals who do not play an instrument in terms of skill and reaction time.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
The study was conducted at Haliç University on 10 individuals who have been playing the piano for at least five years (Group 1) and 10 individuals who have never played an instrument in their lives (Group 2).
The individuals who agreed to participate in the study and signed the consent form were administered the "Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire" to determine hand dominance, the "Nine-Hole Peg Test" to evaluate hand dexterity, and the "Nelson Hand Reaction Test" to determine reaction time.
We believe that the results of our study will provide new perspectives to the literature.Statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS 24.0 program.
If the data is parametric, paired sample t-test will be used for within-group evaluation; independent sample t-test will be used for between-group evaluation.
If the data is non-parametric, Wilson test will be used for within-group evaluation and Mann Whitney U test will be used for between-group evaluation.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Halic University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Pianists and Individuals Who Do Not Play Instruments
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For Group 1:
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Being between the ages of 18-30
- Having played an instrument professionally for at least 3 years
For Group 2:
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Being between the ages of 18-30
- Having not played/does not play any instrument before or currently
Exclusion Criteria:
For Group 1:
- Being able to play an instrument other than the piano professionally
- Having a surgical operation involving the shoulder, arm, forearm or hand in the last 6 months
- Having any systemic, genetic, neurological or orthopedic problems that would prevent the tests
For Group 2:
- Having a surgical operation involving the shoulder, arm, forearm or hand in the last 6 months
- Having any systemic, genetic, neurological or orthopedic problems that would prevent the tests
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Group 1: Pianists
The non-dominant hands of the pianists in this group were evaluated.
|
No intervention was applied to individuals in this group.
|
|
Group 2: Individuals Who Do Not Play Instruments
The dominant hands of the individuals who do not play instruments in this group were evaluated.
|
No intervention was applied to individuals in this group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline
|
Used to determine hand dominance. The survey's answer options; the results of the survey were evaluated according to Geschwind's score as follows, in line with the answers given.
|
at baseline
|
|
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: at baseline
|
It was used to evaluate fine manual skills against time.
The participant was asked to place 9 3.2 cm long sticks into the holes on the platform as quickly as possible with his hand and the time from the start command to the last stick was recorded.
Then, he was asked to collect the sticks in order with the same hand and the time to remove all the sticks was recorded in seconds.
|
at baseline
|
|
Nelson Hand Reaction Test
Time Frame: at baseline
|
It was used to evaluate reaction time.
It consists of a ruler graduated in time.
The tester held the ruler by the end between the thumb and index finger of the subject and then released the ruler.
The upper point where the subject grasped the ruler with his fingers was recorded.
|
at baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Duygu Şahin Altaç, PT, MSc., Halic University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Heinan M. A review of the unique injuries sustained by musicians. JAAPA. 2008 Apr;21(4):45-6, 48, 50 passim. doi: 10.1097/01720610-200804000-00015. No abstract available.
- Haslinger B, Erhard P, Altenmuller E, Hennenlotter A, Schwaiger M, Grafin von Einsiedel H, Rummeny E, Conrad B, Ceballos-Baumann AO. Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Jul;22(3):206-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20028.
- Poole JL, Burtner PA, Torres TA, McMullen CK, Markham A, Marcum ML, Anderson JB, Qualls C. Measuring dexterity in children using the Nine-hole Peg Test. J Hand Ther. 2005 Jul-Sep;18(3):348-51. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.003.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 10, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 10, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
July 10, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 28, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 31, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 19, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 14, 2025
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Function
-
Maastricht UniversityWageningen University and Research; Top Institute Food and Nutrition; Netherlands...TerminatedCognitive Function | Ageing | Physical Function | Mitochondrial FunctionNetherlands
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRecruitingCardiopulmonary Function | Respiratory Function Tests,Heart Function TestsChina
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Active, not recruitingCognitive Function | Physical FunctionTaiwan
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawActive, not recruitingCognitive Function | Executive FunctionPoland
-
University of FloridaNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive Function | Older Adults | Physical FunctionUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownSexual Function Disturbances | Urinary Function DisordersEgypt
-
University of MalagaNot yet recruitingMenopause | Physical Function | Musculoskeletal FunctionSpain
-
University Hospital, GenevaCompletedCognitive Function | Falls | Physical FunctionSwitzerland
-
Amazentis SAUniversity of Washington; Synteract, Inc.CompletedAging | Muscle Function | Mitochondrial Function, BioenergeticsUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedNormal Hepatic Function | Impaired Hepatic FunctionUnited States
Clinical Trials on The same evaluation methods were used for both groups. No intervention was applied to individuals in two groups..
-
Halic UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul University-CerrahpasaTugtepe Pediatric Urology ClinicCompletedLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Muscle Weakness Condition | Lower Extremity Problem | Posture Disorders in Children | Urinary Incontinence in ChildrenTurkey
-
Istanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityUnknownPeriodontitisTurkey