Enhanced Protein Intake to Support Muscle Protein Synthesis in ICU (IPA-IC)

December 3, 2025 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Increased Protein Amount as a Nutritional Strategy to Enhance Muscle Protein Synthesis in ICU Patients

Rationale - Critically ill patients often experience severe skeletal muscle wasting due to an imbalance between muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and degradation, contributing to long-term impairments such as ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Effective interventions to mitigate muscle wasting remain a critical unmet need. Protein intake has been identified as a potential modulator of MPS, but anabolic resistance and conflicting evidence regarding optimal protein intake necessitate further investigation.

Objective/Hypothesis - This study aims to evaluate the effect of a normal (target: 0.8 g protein/kg/day) versus elevated (target: 1.3 g protein/kg/day) protein intake on MPS rates over four days in critically ill patients.

Population - 26 critically ill patients who are suitable for enteral nutrition, mechanically ventilated (min 3 days), and stay at the ICU for at least 7 days will be included.

Method: Patients are randomly assigned to two groups (normal or higher protein intake). Muscle biopsies and blood samples will be collected to assess muscle protein synthesis rates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Complexities of Critical Illness - Critical illness encompasses the progression of severe medical conditions like major trauma or sepsis, which disrupt the body's homeostasis. This imbalance increases susceptibility to vital organ dysfunction, thereby posing imminent life-threatening consequences without prompt intensive medical support in hospitals. A key concern in critically ill patients is the rapid onset of skeletal muscle wasting, resulting in a condition known as intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). This muscle weakness is closely associated with extended mechanical ventilation and higher morbidity and mortality rates. Even after recovery, patients often suffer from long-term physical impairments and disabilities, resulting in post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), a condition characterized by persistent and debilitating consequences of ICU admission. Muscle weakness can last several years after ICU discharge, contributing to increased healthcare costs and a reduced quality of life. Considering the profound impact on both short- and long-term outcomes, coupled with the absence of effective strategies to prevent muscle wasting and weakness, remain major challenges in modern intensive care medicine.

Skeletal Muscle Protein Imbalance - Skeletal muscle mass is regulated by the balance between muscle protein synthesis, degradation, and folding. Under stable conditions, proteins serve structural and functional purposes crucial for growth, recovery, and adaptation. However, critical illness alters protein dynamics. Disturbance in protein folding can result in the accumulation of damaged proteins, causing a decline in protein quality, while imbalances between protein synthesis and degradation can lead to a decrease in quantity. Critically ill patients often experience a metabolic shift towards a catabolic state, wherein skeletal muscles are broken down to fulfill energy demands. Notably, during this catabolic phase, muscle proteins become a primary fuel source, with rates of muscle protein breakdown surpassing those of synthesis. This rapid muscle protein loss can result in up to 18% reduction in muscle mass within the first 10 days of ICU stay, ultimately leading to muscle atrophy.

Previous research has utilized nitrogen balance assessments and stable isotope techniques to evaluate whole-body protein turnover. However, only a few studies have specifically measured muscle protein synthesis (MPS) rates in critically ill patients using intravenous stable isotope infusions. These measurements typically cover short durations (less than 9 hours), making it challenging to extrapolate the findings to long-term outcomes due to the inherent limitations of amino acid tracer techniques. Adaptions to muscle disuse, inflammation, and catabolic stress likely occur over several days or weeks rather than hours. A promising alternative is oral deuterated water (D2O), which enables the assessment of MPS over longer periods (days or weeks). Current research by our group used D2O to provide insights into muscle synthesis rates over multiple ICU days. This pioneering study will establish critical baseline data for future research.

Protein Ingestion as a Key Modulator - To improve patient recovery, interventions targeting muscle loss are recommended. The 2019 guidelines from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) emphasize the importance of nutritional support for mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Specifically, dietary proteins and their amino acid composition are key in mitigating skeletal muscle wasting and improving long-term clinical outcomes. However, the efficacy of dietary protein to stimulate MPS is regulated by various physiological factors such as dietary protein digestion and amino acid absorption, splanchnic amino acid retention, postprandial insulin release, skeletal muscle tissue perfusion, amino acid uptake by muscle, and intramyocellular signaling. Current international guidelines recommend elevated protein intake for critically ill patients, ranging from 1.2 to 2.0 g protein/kg body weight/day, exceeding recommendations for healthy individuals. However, while higher protein intake has been shown to enhance MPS, recent research suggests that the upper threshold of 2.0 g/kg/day may negatively impact health-related quality of life without improving functional outcomes up to 180 days post-ICU admission. Given these conflicting findings, the precise impact of elevated protein intake on MPS in critically ill patients remains unclear, warranting further investigation to determine the optimal protein requirements during critical illness. Furthermore, despite these widely accepted guidelines and intake recommendations, observational studies have reported that actual protein intake in ICU patients often falls below these targets, ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 g/kg/day. Recent research demonstrated efficient digestion and absorption of enterally administered protein. Nevertheless, post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates were much lower in critically ill patients than in healthy volunteers. This indicates that critical illness does not impair dietary protein digestion and amino acid absorption. However, incorporating dietary protein-derived amino acids into skeletal muscle protein is blunted, representing anabolic resistance to dietary protein. This anabolic resistance underscores the complexity of muscle protein metabolism in critically ill patients and highlights the need for effective strategies to attenuate skeletal muscle wasting.

In short, this prospective study aims to evaluate the effect of normal vs. elevated enteral protein administration on muscle protein synthesis rates and muscle characteristics in critically ill patients. This research will provide valuable insights to develop effective nutritional interventions to address skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Suitability for enteral nutrition (i.e., no GI failure, absence of complete intestinal obstruction, no major intra-abdominal sepsis)
  • Expected mechanical ventilation of minimal three days
  • Expected ICU stay of at least seven days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Chronic corticosteroid use before hospital admission
  • severe allergies or intolerances (e.g., to cow's milk protein, fish, soy, pea protein or galactosemia)
  • Severe kidney and/or liver failure
  • Requirements for dialysis
  • Bleeding disorders, including anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Normal protein amount
Containing standard protein levels to target normal protein amount of 0.8 g of protein/kg body weight/day
Experimental: Elevated protein amount
Containing higher protein levels to target elevated protein amount of 1.3 g of protein/kg body weight/day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Myofibrillar protein fractional synthetic rate
Time Frame: 1-4 days
The myofibrillar protein synthesis rates are calculated using D2O.
1-4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma amino acids concentrations
Time Frame: 1-4 days
Determining differences in plasma amino acids concentration between groups receiving normal versus elevated protein levels through enteral nutrition
1-4 days
Mixed muscle protein fractional synthetic rate
Time Frame: 1-4 days
The mixed muscle protein synthesis rates are calculated using D2O.
1-4 days
Muscle fiber size in µm²
Time Frame: Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Muscle fiber size will be assessed using immunofluorescence staining.
Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Proportion (%) of muscle fiber types (type I and type II)
Time Frame: Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Fiber proportion will be assessed using immunofluorescence staining.
Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Myonuclei quantity
Time Frame: Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Myonuclei quantity will be assessed using immunofluorescence staining.
Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Mitochondrial respiration
Time Frame: Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)
Mitochondrial respiration will be assessed using Oroboros Instruments (Oroboros O2k FluoRepirometer).
Final intervention day (after 4 days of enteral feeding)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age in years
Time Frame: Baseline
Heteroanamnesia
Baseline
Body mass in kg
Time Frame: Baseline
Heteroanamnesia
Baseline
Height in m
Time Frame: Baseline
Heteroanamnesia
Baseline
BMI in kg/m²
Time Frame: Baseline
Calculated from height and body mass
Baseline
Clinical health data
Time Frame: Baseline
Clinical health data (Smoker status, Reason for ICU admission, Comorbidities, Highest recorded temperature, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Rockwood Clinical Frailty Index, APACHE II score, APACHE IV score, APS score, SAPS II, Medications, Routine blood test results, Length of ICU and hospital stay, Days in study, Survival outcomes, Muscle biopsy time points, Nutritional intake, Study product compliance, Study product tolerance) will be collected by the attending physician, healthcare staff, and the laboratory technicians.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024/223

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Nutritionally complete Tube Feed with standard protein levels

Subscribe