Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT) Scores in Pediatric Trauma Patients

January 4, 2026 updated by: Emre Kudu, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Diagnostic Value of PePCI and ManTIS Scores in Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT) Decision-Making for Pediatric Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department

Pediatric trauma assessment is challenging due to difficulties in obtaining information, which increases the need for unnecessary imaging. Trauma-related injuries remain a significant cause of death in children. Although whole-body computed tomography (CT) is frequently used due to a lower threshold for imaging, issues such as high radiation exposure arise.

To reduce unnecessary radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients, scoring systems such as PePCI (Pediatric Polytrauma CT Indication Score) and ManTIS (Manchester Trauma Imaging Score) have been developed. These studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in predicting the need for CT scans and preventing unnecessary examinations. However, both studies are retrospective analyses limited to a single region. Therefore, a prospective study is planned in Türkiye to evaluate the reliability and applicability of these scoring systems and their real-world benefits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The assessment of trauma in children is challenging due to difficulties in obtaining information about the mechanism and process of trauma, which leads doctors to perform more imaging. Although the incidence of fatal injuries in children has decreased in the last decade, trauma-related injuries remain a leading cause of death among children over one-year-old. Due to the lower imaging threshold in children compared to adults, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is frequently used. WBCT is an essential tool for the rapid diagnosis of injuries, especially in hemodynamically unstable pediatric multi-trauma patients.

The most accurate criteria for activating the trauma team in pediatric trauma patients are still being debated. According to the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines, the trauma team is activated based on the mechanism of injury; thus, WBCT is performed even in hemodynamically stable pediatric patients. This situation leads to unnecessary radiation exposure, increased costs, and resource wastage. Although the mechanism of injury does not constitute a sufficient indication for WBCT in pediatric patients, many trauma patients are evaluated with WBCT to avoid missing potential injuries.

In pediatric emergency department patients, it is known that WBCT is not associated with a reduction in mortality but is linked to high radiation exposure and increased lifetime risk for leukemia, solid cancers, and brain tumors. Therefore, although we know the benefits of targeted emergency CT scans, the usefulness of WBCT imaging for pediatric trauma patients is debated.

The severity of injuries, especially in multi-trauma patients, is classified using the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The ISS is based on an anatomical ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 75 points, with low scores representing mild injuries and high scores representing severe and fatal injuries. Generally, an ISS >15 indicates serious injuries. This scoring system is also applicable to children and adolescents. However, pediatric patients show lower mortality for the same ISS compared to adults, attributed to physiological response differences between adults and children. Therefore, a new classification for injury severity in pediatric patients has been proposed. While an ISS >15 in adults indicates serious injury, an ISS >23 in the pediatric population indicates serious injury, and patients with an ISS >26 may have functional impairments at discharge.

To reduce unnecessary radiation exposure and prevent resource wastage in pediatric trauma patients, a new study was conducted by Strahl and colleagues. The study involved pediatric emergency patients with high-energy trauma mechanisms at a Level I trauma center in Germany. As a result of this study, a pediatric polytrauma CT indication score (PePCI) was developed to analyze pediatric trauma patients and reduce radiation exposure. The performance of this score was compared with the ISS. In this study, cases were screened retrospectively. It was found that WBCT was applied to 243 pediatric trauma patients. If the PePCI score had been applied to pediatric trauma patients, it could have been determined that WBCT would not have been necessary for 76 of the 243 patients they screened. Moreover, no significant injuries would have been overlooked.

Another single-center study conducted by Davies and colleagues in the United Kingdom (UK) demonstrated that a large patient group in the UK is exposed to unnecessary radiation. This situation is thought to increase the risk of life-threatening outcomes, such as malignancy, in the future. With appropriate evaluation, it has been shown that WBCT imaging may not be necessary for some trauma patients. A scoring system called the Manchester Trauma Imaging Score (ManTIS) has been developed to facilitate this evaluation. The ManTIS score has been shown to safely reduce the number of unnecessary WBCTs in the young patient group.

Although these studies have shown that the PePCI and ManTIS scores effectively predict the need for WBCT and prevent unnecessary scans, they have been conducted in a single region. The developed scoring systems are only applicable to specific geographical areas. Additionally, both studies were retrospective. Therefore, this study plans to prospectively evaluate the reliability, applicability, and practicality of these scores in clinical practice in Türkiye, assessing their real-life benefits.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

684

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes all pediatric trauma cases that present to the red area of the emergency department.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All pediatric trauma patients who present to the emergency red zone or are deemed appropriate for monitoring in the red zone during their emergency department visit.
  • Patients for whom consent to participate in the study is provided by their legal guardians (as children are not able to provide consent independently)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously been included in the study.
  • Patients who refuse treatment before their assessment is completed or withdraw their consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients with incomplete study data.
  • Patients with penetrating injuries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Traumatic pediatric patients
Patients under 18 years old present to the emergency department red area due to trauma.
The PePCI and ManTIS scores have been developed to predict the indication for whole-body CT in pediatric cases presenting to the emergency department with trauma. These scores help reduce unnecessary radiation exposure in pediatric trauma cases.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whole Body Computed Tomography Need
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Patients will be evaluated by an expert panel, which will include three emergency medicine specialists. The panel will assess all relevant clinical data, including trauma history, physical examination findings, laboratory results, imaging outcomes, consultations, and final dispositions. Based on this comprehensive evaluation, the panel will determine whether the patient requires WBCT. As a result, the primary outcome will be recorded as a binary measure: either the patient requires WBCT or does not require WBCT.
through study completion, an average of 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 09.2024.782

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Whole Body Computed Tomography Imaging

Clinical Trials on The PePCI and ManTIS scores

Subscribe