- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00244140
Ultravist: Safety and Efficacy in Computed Tomography of Head and Body
Ultravist 370 Milligrams of Iodine Per Milliliter (mg I/mL): Safety and Efficacy in Computed Tomography of Head and Body
This is a research study involving the use of a contrast agent called Ultravist Injection. Ultravist, the study drug, is used to improve the pictures obtained using computed tomography (CT). Ultravist acts like a dye to make CT pictures brighter and easier to read. In the case of this study, it will be injected into a vein in the patient's arm; from there, it travels through the blood stream and to the areas to be examined. CT scans will then be taken of the patient's head and/or body as ordered by his/her physician.
Phase IIIb Study to Document the Safety and Efficacy of Ultravist 370 mg I/ml, When Administered Intravenously, in Volumes up to 162.2 ml, for Clinically Indicated Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) of the Head and/or Body
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study has previously been posted by Berlex, Inc. Berlex, Inc. has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the sponsor of the trial.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bogota, Colombia
-
Bogotá, Colombia
-
-
Antioquia
-
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
-
-
-
-
-
Mumbai-400026, India
-
Tamil Nadu, India
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
-
-
Seoul Teugbyeolsi
-
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85711
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33101
-
Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
-
-
Illinois
-
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114-2696
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0030
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
-
Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794-8460
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Is at least 18 years old and clinically indicated for a contrast-enhanced CT of the head or body.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that are less than 18 years old and do not have a clinical indication for a contrast-enhanced CT of the head or body.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Iopromide 370 mg I/mL
Iopromide (Ultravist 370 mg I/mL) administered intravenously
|
Iopromide (Ultravist 370 mg I/mL) administered intravenously
|
|
Experimental: Iopromide 300 mg I/mL
Iopromide (Ultravist 300 mg I/mL) administered intravenously
|
Iopromide (Ultravist 300 mg I/mL) administered intravenously
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Quality of Visualization of the Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) Images, Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment.
Time Frame: post administration assessment of study images
|
A subjective assessment of the 'Quality of Image' (QOI) by 3 blinded readers (BR).
QOI-Grades used: Excellent - Good - Poor.
|
post administration assessment of study images
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Ability of the Investigator to Make a Diagnosis Based on the CECT Images
Time Frame: post administration assessment of study images
|
The number of participants with diagnostic CECTs as assessed by the investigators.
|
post administration assessment of study images
|
|
The Quality of Visualization of the Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) Images, Based on the Investigators' Assessment.
Time Frame: post administration assessment of study images
|
A subjective assessment of the 'Quality of Image' (QOI) by the investigators.
QOI-Grades used: Excellent - Good - Poor.
|
post administration assessment of study images
|
|
The Ability of the Blinded Readers to Make a Diagnosis Based on the CECT Images
Time Frame: post administration assessment of study images
|
The number of participants with diagnostic CECTs as assessed by the 3 blinded readers.
|
post administration assessment of study images
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 91462
- 309660 (Other Identifier: company internal)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.