Biodex Balance System Cut-off Scores in Geriatric Individuals

Biodex Balance System Cut-off Scores in Geriatric Individuals With Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Low back pain (LBP) is an important musculoskeletal problem that causes clinical, social and economic losses. LBP, which affects approximately 85% of the lifetime population, becomes chronic LBP in 23% of individuals lasting 3 months or more. Although there are various forms of LBP, the most common form is non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). There are no specific and definable pathologies in NSLBP such as a history of spinal surgery, presence of neurological deficit, facet joint problem, disc herniation and sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Biodex Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY) (BBS) is a device used for objective evaluation of static and dynamic balance, allowing free movement in mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. The validity-reliability studies of the BBS were conducted in various populations including active, non-active, young adult and geriatric individuals, and individuals with ankle sprains. The validity-reliability study of individuals with NSLBP was reported by Sherafat et al. has a strong-excellent correlation with four-square step test, timed-up-and-go test, Berg Balance Scale, and single leg stance test.

Studies have emphasized the use of BBS in geriatric individuals with NSLBP, but no data on the cut-off scores of this system have been found. The determination of a cut-off score with high sensitivity and specificity is thought to be beneficial for detecting deterioration in functional status in geriatric individuals with NSLBP. Therefore, the aim of our study is to determine BBS cut-off scores in geriatric individuals with NSLBP.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Low Back Pain; Balance; Distorted
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Determination of the Cut-off Scores of Biodex Balance System

Detailed Description

Low back pain (LBP) is an important musculoskeletal problem that causes clinical, social and economic losses. LBP, which affects approximately 85% of the lifetime population, becomes chronic LBP in 23% of individuals lasting 3 months or more. Although there are various forms of LBP, the most common form is non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). There are no specific and definable pathologies in NSLBP such as a history of spinal surgery, presence of neurological deficit, facet joint problem, disc herniation and sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Although there are studies examining the changes in various positions in geriatric individuals with NSLBP, maintaining and maintaining postural control during standing position has been the focus of current studies. According to the systematic review study on the effect of sensory manipulations on postural release changes in individuals with NSLBP, the results are uncertain and further studies are needed. For example, in cases where sensory systems (eg visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular) that are effective in achieving postural control are not manipulated, some studies report greater release size in NSLBP patients, while others find that the size of release is similar to healthy individuals. Sherafat et al. Emphasized that the evaluation of gravity center changes in static environment may be effective in the emergence of these contradictory results. As expressed in this study, standing still on a static platform may be an obstacle to detect small postural stability and balance differences between individuals with and without NSLBP. In this context, testing of geriatric individuals with NSLBP in the standing position on a mobile platform such as the Biodex Balance System (BBS) (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY) and exposure to more stringent equilibrium conditions will yield more sensitive results in assessing postural stability and balance.

BBS is a device used for objective evaluation of static and dynamic balance, allowing free movement in mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. The validity-reliability studies of the BBS were conducted in various populations including active, non-active, young adult and geriatric individuals, and individuals with ankle sprains. The validity-reliability study of individuals with NSLBP was reported by Sherafat et al. has a strong-excellent correlation with four-square step test, timed-up-and-go test, Berg Balance Scale, and single leg stance test.

Studies have emphasized the use of BBS in geriatric individuals with NSLBP, but no data on the cut-off scores of this system have been found. The determination of a cut-off score with high sensitivity and specificity is thought to be beneficial for detecting deterioration in functional status in geriatric individuals with NSLBP. Therefore, the aim of our study is to determine BBS cut-off scores in geriatric individuals with NSLBP.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 52

Contacts and Locations

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: N/A
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Our study will be planned as a cross-sectional study. 52 geriatric individuals with NSLBP who applied to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Outpatient Clinic will be included in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria. These individuals will be evaluated by an experienced physiotherapist in the laboratory for the variables examined during the day.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• the presence of episodic low back pain for 12 months or more,
• having a 40 mm pain score on the day of visual analog scale,
• the ability to follow and follow verbal commands,
• to volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• presence of severe spinal pathologies,
• history of spinal surgery,
• presence of neurological deficits,
• diagnosis of any specific low back pain (facet joint problem, disc herniation and sacroiliac joint dysfunction, etc.),
• nerve root compression,
• scoliosis, lordosis or kyphosis,
• cancer or the presence of other autoimmune diseases.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Biodex Balance System (BBS)	The BBS will be used to assess postural performance of participants. The movable platform of the BBS allows up to 20° of surface tilt in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. The device is equipped with computer software (Biodex, version 3.1; Biodex Medical Systems). Medial-lateral stability index (MLSI) will be assessed.	6 weeks
Antero-posterior stability index	Antero-posterior stability index (APSI) will be assessed.	6 weeks
Overall stability index	Overall stability index (OSI) will be assessed.	6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BergBS)	The Berg Balance Scale (BergBS) will be used as a gold-standard test to measure postural performance of participants. The BergBS is a qualitative measure that assesses postural performance via performing functional activities such as reaching, bending, transferring, and standing that incorporates most components of postural control: sitting and transferring safely between chairs; standing with feet apart, feet together, in single-leg stance, and feet in the tandem Romberg position with eyes-open or eyes-closed; reaching and stooping down to pick something off the floor. Each item is scored along a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, each grade with well-established criteria. Zero indicates the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. The total score ranges from 0 to 56.	6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Hacettepe University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Sherafat S, Salavati M, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Akhbari B, Mohammadirad S, Mazaheri M, Negahban H. Intrasession and intersession reliability of postural control in participants with and without nonspecific low back pain using the Biodex Balance System. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.12.005.
• Dawson N, Dzurino D, Karleskint M, Tucker J. Examining the reliability, correlation, and validity of commonly used assessment tools to measure balance. Health Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 27;1(12):e98. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.98. eCollection 2018 Dec.
• Arifin N, Abu Osman NA, Wan Abas WA. Intrarater test-retest reliability of static and dynamic stability indexes measurement using the Biodex Stability System during unilateral stance. J Appl Biomech. 2014 Apr;30(2):300-4. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0130. Epub 2013 Jul 20.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ANTICIPATED): December 20, 2019
• Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED): March 20, 2020
• Study Completion (ANTICIPATED): April 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 25, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 27, 2019
• First Posted (ACTUAL): November 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): November 29, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 27, 2019
• Last Verified: November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Back Pain; Low Back Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2019800

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No