Clinical Evaluation Of MP26 Features in Adults

December 5, 2018 updated by: GE Healthcare
The purpose of the study is to collect representative clinical images (head and whole-body scans) of demonstrated diagnostic quality using the next-generation SIGNA PET/MR device equipped with investigational software components in adult population. The images and summary data from this study are intended for use in regulatory submission.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective: To demonstrate diagnostic image quality of image sets with ZTE MRAC and Q Static (Q. MRAC) for SIGNA PET/MR in representative clinical cases of the general imaging population.

Secondary Objective(s): To verify diagnostic acceptability, ease of use, and functionality of ZTE MRAC and Q Static (Q. MRAC) for SIGNA PET/MR at clinical sites.

Safety Objective(s): To collect information about safety events and device issues.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Are adults (aged 18 or older);
  2. Have preexisting clinical indication for PET/CT or PET/MR with radiotracer injection (for subjects that will undergo ZTE procedures, a preexisting clinical indication for PET/CT is required);
  3. Are able to undergo PET/MR within the tracer validity time frame after radiotracer injection;
  4. Can hear without assistive devices and have necessary mental capacity to follow study instructions;
  5. Are willing and able to provide written informed consent;
  6. Are considered eligible for MRI and PET exams, according to site institutional safety policies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Were previously enrolled in the study;
  2. If female, are pregnant or of undetermined pregnancy status;
  3. Cannot fit safely in the device (>55 cm axial diameter or >227 kgs body weight);
  4. Have implants or attached medical devices that could be unsafe for MRI;
  5. Have medical conditions or require urgent care that could make it unsafe to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PET/MR ZTE MRAC

PET/MR zero echo time (ZTE) scan for head attenuation and Q.Static . PET/MR ZTE MRAC images to be acquired for post-processing and reader assessment.

Zero Echo Time (ZTE) scan for head attenuation

The GE SIGNA PET/MR MP26 software platform includes the zero echo time (ZTE) scan for head attenuation and Q.Static. The ZTE MR software feature has the potential to enable better visualization of bones, including those in the head, by employing optimal head attenuation correction in PET/MR.

PET/MR ZTE MRAC

Experimental: PET/MR Q Static (Q. MRAC)

Q.Static (Q. MRAC) for respiratory motion correction. PET/MR Q Static (Q. MRAC) images to be acquired for post-processing and reader assessment.

PET/MR Q Static (Q. MRAC)

An improved Q.Static feature with Q. MRAC, where phase matching the MRAC with the quiescent phase is employed to get more accurate attenuation correction for our Q.Static PET images.

PET/MR Q Static (Q. MRAC)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Image Quality
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months

scored on a 5-pt Likert scale:

  1. Unacceptable
  2. Poor
  3. Acceptable
  4. Good
  5. Excellent
through study completion, an average of 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of Diagnostic Acceptability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months
Site level determination of diagnostic acceptability (Y/N) based on consensus between radiologist(s) and nuclear medicine physician(s) at the site. Diagnostic acceptability in the form of binary responses (Y/N) were collected from 61 subjects who completed the study.
through study completion, an average of 2 months
Ease of Use Per Procedure Rated on a 5-pt Likert Scale Score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months
Ease of use ratings, based on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g. 1=unacceptable, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, 5=excellent), were collected from the population of subjects who completed the study.
through study completion, an average of 2 months
Number of Participants Reporting "Yes" On All Binary Performance Scale Questions
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months
The number of participants reporting "yes" on a binary performance scale (Y/N) were collected.
through study completion, an average of 2 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Summary of Safety Information
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months
Number of safety events (AEs and SAEs).
through study completion, an average of 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tibor Duliskovich, M.D., GE Healthcare, Medical Monitor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 114.03-2016-GES-0001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe