- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06815380
A Study to Assess the Impact of Lebrikizumab on Health-Related Well-Being and Control of Skin Manifestations in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (ADTrust)
February 4, 2025 updated by: Almirall, S.A.
A European, Multicenter, Prospective Observational Phase IV Clinical Study to Assess the Impact of Lebrikizumab on Health-Related Well-Being and Control of Skin Manifestations in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of lebrikizumab treatment on the overall well-being of adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD in real-world clinical practice settings across Europe, as measured using validated 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (WHO-5) and to investigate effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab, treatment satisfaction, and long-term effect of lebrikizumab treatment on participants in terms of disease symptomatology/control, fatigue, work impairment, patient's relationship with their skin, and overall QOL among adult participants.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
1000
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Èric Massana
- Phone Number: 0034 932 913 986
- Email: eric.massana@almirall.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aarhus, Denmark
- Recruiting
- Aarhus University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Dr. Christian Vestergaard
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis treated with lebrikizumab (Ebglyss®) will be included.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (greater than or equal to [>=] 18 years) male or female participants with diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Atopic dermatitis.
- Adult participants prescribed lebrikizumab as part of routine/usual care to manage their moderate-to severe Atopic dermatitis.
- Willingness and ability to participate in the study; participants must give their written consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients of lebrikizumab (Ebglyss®).
- Participants with pre-existing helminth infections. These participants should be treated for helminth infection before starting lebrikizumab therapy.
- Concomitant use of live and live attenuated vaccines.
- Pregnant women, except when the potential benefit justifies the potential risk.
- Participants included in a clinical trial at baseline or at any time during the planned study period.
- Participants unable to comply with the requirements of the study or who, in the opinion of the study physician, should not participate in the study.
- Participants for whom medical chart is inaccessible to physicians to complete baseline data collection.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
All Participants
Participants with atopic dermatitis and treated with lebrikizumab (Ebglyss®) according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) in routine clinical practice, data will be collected and observed for 104 weeks.
|
This is non-interventional study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Measures in the Overall Health-related Well-being Index Evaluated Through World Health Organization (WHO-5) Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The WHO-5 item well-being index is a generic global rating scale measuring subjective well-being and contains positively phrased items.
The respondent is asked to rate how well each of the 5 items applies to him or her when considering the last 14 days.
Each of the 5 items is scored from 5 (all of the time) to 0 (none of the time).
The raw score therefore theoretically ranges from 0 (absence of well-being) to 25 (maximal well-being).
To standardize the score on a scale from 0 (absent) to 100 (maximal), it is recommended to multiply the raw score by 4.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Overall Health-related Well-being Index Evaluated Through WHO-5 Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The WHO-5 item well-being index is a generic global rating scale measuring subjective well-being and contains positively phrased items.
The respondent is asked to rate how well each of the 5 items applies to him or her when considering the last 14 days.
Each of the 5 items is scored from 5 (all of the time) to 0 (none of the time).
The raw score therefore theoretically ranges from 0 (absence of well-being) to 25 (maximal well-being).
To standardize the score on a scale from 0 (absent) to 100 (maximal), it is recommended to multiply the raw score by 4.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants with 50 Percent (%) or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score (EASI50) Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranging from 0 to 72 where 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0
= almost clear; 1.1-7.0
= mild; 7.1-21.0
= moderate; 21.1-50.0
= severe; 50.1-72.0
= very severe, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
EASI 50 is defined as 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the EASI score.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Percentage of Participants with 75% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Overall EASI Score (EASI75) Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranging from 0 to 72 where 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0
= almost clear; 1.1-7.0
= mild; 7.1-21.0
= moderate; 21.1-50.0
= severe; 50.1-72.0
= very severe, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
EASI75 is defined as 75% or greater reduction from baseline in the EASI score.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Percentage of Participants with 90% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Overall EASI Score (EASI90) Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranging from 0 to 72 where 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0
= almost clear; 1.1-7.0
= mild; 7.1-21.0
= moderate; 21.1-50.0
= severe; 50.1-72.0
= very severe, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
EASI 90 is defined as 90% or greater reduction from baseline in the EASI score.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Percentage of Participants with 100% Reduction From Baseline in Overall EASI Score (EASI100) Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranging from 0 to 72 where 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0
= almost clear; 1.1-7.0
= mild; 7.1-21.0
= moderate; 21.1-50.0
= severe; 50.1-72.0
= very severe, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
EASI100 is defined as 100% reduction from baseline in the EASI score.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Absolute EASI Score Less than or Equal (<=) to 7 Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; The EASI score assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) induration/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe).
The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranging from 0 to 72 where 0 = clear; 0.1-1.0
= almost clear; 1.1-7.0
= mild; 7.1-21.0
= moderate; 21.1-50.0
= severe; 50.1-72.0
= very severe, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Overall Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of the participants AD.
It is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe), and a score is selected using descriptors that best describe the overall appearance of the lesions at a given time point.
The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, and oozing/crusting.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Overall IGA Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of the participants AD.
It is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe), and a score is selected using descriptors that best describe the overall appearance of the lesions at a given time point.
The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, and oozing/crusting.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change from Baseline in Overall IGA Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of the participants AD.
It is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe), and a score is selected using descriptors that best describe the overall appearance of the lesions at a given time point.
The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, and oozing/crusting.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The POEM is a 7-item, validated, questionnaire used by the participants to assess disease symptoms over the last week.
The participants will be asked to respond to 7 questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep disturbance, bleeding and weeping.
All 7 answers carry equal weight with a total possible score from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days=0; 1- 2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; everyday = 4).
A high score is indicative of severe atopic dermatitis
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in POEM Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
The POEM is a 7-item, validated, questionnaire used by the participants to assess disease symptoms over the last week.
The participants will be asked to respond to 7 questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep disturbance, bleeding and weeping.
All 7 answers carry equal weight with a total possible score from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days=0; 1- 2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; everyday = 4).
A high score is indicative of severe atopic dermatitis
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Pruritus NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level of itching on the skin (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of itching on the skin due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no itching) and 10 (worst itching imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pruritus NRS Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Pruritus NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level of itching on the skin (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of itching on the skin due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no itching) and 10 (worst itching imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Skin Pain NRS Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Skin pain NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level of skin pain (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of skin pain due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no skin pain) and 10 (worst skin pain imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Skin pain NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level of skin pain (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of skin pain due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no skin pain) and 10 (worst skin pain imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Fatigue NRS Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Fatigue NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level fatigue (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of fatigue due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no fatigue) and 10 (worst fatigue imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fatigue NRS Score Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Fatigue NRS is a self-administered scale to assess participants worst level fatigue (in the last 24 hours) experienced due to atopic dermatitis.
The scale has a single-item that describes the worst level of fatigue due to atopic dermatitis in the last 24 hours on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no fatigue) and 10 (worst fatigue imaginable).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Absolute Measures in Sleep Quality Scale Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Sleep quality scale is a self-administered scale to assess participants overall sleep quality, in terms of the extent to which itching interfered with their sleep last night.
The scale has a single-item that describes the interference of itching on sleep last night on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no interference) and 10 (unable to sleep at all).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Scale Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
Sleep quality scale is a self-administered scale to assess participants overall sleep quality, in terms of the extent to which itching interfered with their sleep last night.
The scale has a single-item that describes the interference of itching on sleep last night on an 11-point scale anchored at 0 (no interference) and 10 (unable to sleep at all).
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs Throughout the Study Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 104
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant who has been administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product.
An ADR is defined as a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended.
Response in this context means that there is a reasonable suspected causal relationship between the medicinal product and the adverse event.
An AE or ADR is serious (SAE / SADR) as per following categories: death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongs existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or any other medically important event.
|
Baseline up to Week 104
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 23, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2025
Last Verified
February 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M-17923-35
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Eczema
-
Technical University of MunichCelgene CorporationCompletedEczema | Nummular Eczema | Dermatitis Eczema | Nummular DermatitisGermany
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedVesicular Palmoplantar Eczema | PompholyxDenmark
-
Technical University of MunichUniversity Hospital MunichActive, not recruitingNummular EczemaGermany
-
Gary GoldenbergCompletedHand Eczema | Foot EczemaUnited States
-
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire...University of WarwickCompletedCancer | Skin Cancer | Dry Skin; Eczema | Medical Device Site EczemaUnited Kingdom
-
Zealand University HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen; Danish Working Environment FundCompleted
-
SalvatCompleted
-
CorEvitasNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergStatens Serum InstitutRecruiting
Clinical Trials on No Intervention
-
Hopital FochNot yet recruitingInterstitial Lung DiseaseFrance
-
Wave NeuroscienceCompletedAutistic DisorderUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedInflammatory Bowel Diseases | Colorectal Cancer | Diverticular Diseases | Social BehaviorUnited States
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedLupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous | Lupus Erythematosus, DiscoidUnited States, Poland
-
Huashan HospitalZhejiang Cancer Hospital; Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; Tongji Hospital; Qilu Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHead and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Patient Derived Organoid | Drug Sensitive Test in VitroChina
-
Hospital Universitario La Paz3MVX CCB and Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.; Department...RecruitingEmbolism | Atrial Fibrillation | Arrhythmia | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | AblationSpain
-
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall...Ohio State University; University of Houston; Alcon Research; University of Waterloo and other collaboratorsCompletedContact Lens Complication | Contact Lens Acute Red Eye | Contact Lens Related Corneal Infiltrate (Disorder) | Contact Lens-Induced Corneal Fluorescein StainingUnited States, Canada
-
University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeCompleted
-
Hôpital Necker-Enfants MaladesUnknown