- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07194369
- Original Trial
Validation of the Setswana Translated Quality of Recovery Questionnaire in Orthopaedic Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa
Validation of the Setswana Translated Quality of Recovery Questionnaire in Orthopaedic Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa: a Cross-Sectional Observational Study
This observational study aims to evaluate the validity, reliability and feasibility of the Setswana-translated version of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire. The question it aims to answer is:
Does the Setswana translation of the QoR-15 serve as a valid, reliable and user friendly tool for assessing postoperative recovery in Setswana speaking patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery at a tertiary hospital in Gauteng, South Africa?
The participants will be asked to complete the Setswana-translated QoR-15 questionnaire both preoperatively and postoperatively.
In addition, they will be asked to rate their overall postoperative recovery using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Patient reported outcome measures are increasingly recognised as important in preoperative research, yet their routine use in clinical practice remains limited in South Africa.
While quality of recovery measures have been widely applied in general and ambulatory surgery settings, there is a relative paucity of data specifically addressing orthopaedic populations.
Orthopaedic surgical procedures are associated with significant postoperative pain, functional limitations and extended rehabilitation periods, all of which can substantially impact the patient's overall recovery experience. Evaluating a short-term postoperative outcome like quality of recovery in this surgical cohort may help tailor postoperative care to patient needs, which may lead to better patient-clinician communication, better surgical outcomes and better patient satisfaction.
A lack of standardised and validated outcome measures in local languages and high rates of illiteracy may be impediments to implementing widespread use of patient reported outcome questionnaires in practice. Patients who are functionally literate may still not understand medical terms if not presented in their home language and proficiency in English varies widely across South Africa. South Africa has a diverse language heritage with 11 official languages and high rates of functional illiteracy. While many South Africans are able to communicate in English, only a small minority reports English as the primary language used most often outside the household. For black South Africans, the most common languages spoken outside of the home most commonly are IsiZulu, IsiXhosa and the Sotho-Tswana languages.
At present, validated translations of the QoR-15 questionnaire are only available in English and IsiZulu for South African use.
By adding another validated translation in a local language, it is hoped that it will be easier to measure quality of recovery in Setswana speaking populations to address health disparities.
A Setswana translation of the QoR-15 questionnaire exists from a previous study which may be of use in Ga-Rankuwa, which is home to a Setswana speaking population. This translated questionnaire is yet to be validated in this population. For patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be effective in non-English speaking populations, rigorous linguistic and cultural adaptation is necessary.
In this study, quality of recovery will be measured with the Setswana translation of the QoR-15 questionnaire as well as with a visual analog scale on which patients can rate their overall postoperative recovery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Unathi Dr Mzinyathi
- Phone Number: 0711436058
- Email: 201308763@swave.smu.ac.za
Study Locations
-
-
Gauteng
-
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, 0204
- Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kenneth Dr Matea
- Phone Number: 0125293876 0125293876/7
- Email: Kenneth.Matea@gauteng.gov.za
-
Contact:
- Keitumetse Mongale
- Phone Number: 0125293877 0125293877
- Email: keitumetse.mongale@gauteng.gov.za
-
Principal Investigator:
- Unathi Dr Mzinyathi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients over 18 years of age
- Scheduled elective orthopaedic surgery at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not fluent in Setswana
- Patients booked for emergency surgery where a delay to surgery could be detrimental.
- Patients where the surgery is delayed beyond 10 days of the initial assessment and pre-operative QoR-15 measurement.
- Patients with a psychiatric disturbance that precludes complete co-operation.
- Patients with a severe debilitating medical or surgical condition that may limit objective assessment after surgery.
- Patients with any life threatening postoperative complication.
- Postoperative confusion or delirium.
- Patients with a history of recent drug or alcohol abuse which may render responses unreliable.
- Incomplete QoR-15 questionnaires.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Convergent validity of the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: Pre-operative baseline and 24 hours postoperatively.
|
To evaluate convergent validity by assessing the Spearman correlation between the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score and a general visual analog scale (VAS). Unit of measure: Correlation co-efficient (r). |
Pre-operative baseline and 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Construct validity of the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively
|
To evaluate construct validity by assessing associations between the QoR-15 score and patient factors (age, gender, duration & severity of surgery). Unit of Measure: Regression coefficients/association statistics |
Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Internal consistency of the Setswana translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively
|
To evaluate internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha based on the average correlation between the QoR-15 items.
|
Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Test-retest variability of the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: 60 minutes after first postoperative questionnaire
|
To evaluate test-retest variability in a subset of 25 patients who will be asked to complete a repeat assessment 60 minutes after their first postoperative questionnaire. Unit of measure: intraclass correlation coefficient |
60 minutes after first postoperative questionnaire
|
|
Acceptability and feasibility of the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: During recruitment and postoperative assessment
|
To evaluate acceptability and feasibility by calculating the recruitment rate, completion rate and time taken to complete the questionnaire
|
During recruitment and postoperative assessment
|
|
Responsiveness of the Setswana-translated QoR-15 score
Time Frame: Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively.
|
To evaluate responsiveness by calculating Cohen's effect size of change in QoR-15 scores from pre-operative to postoperative assessment.
|
Pre-operative (baseline) and 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Charle Dr Steyl, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SMUREC/M/276/2025:PG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Regarding anonymity of patient information, the only documents to contain the patient's name will be the consent form and a sequentially numbered list that will be completed at recruitment that the PI will store to keep track of patients in the study. All data will be de-identified, no personal information (for example name and file number) will be recorded on any of the other study documents.
Confidentiality will be ensured by the PI storing all paper documents in lever-arch files in a secure location that only the PI and research assistant has access to. The sequentially numbered list will be stored electronically in a password controlled online folder that only the PI has access to. Personal information will not be shared without express patient permission.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia
-
IASO ThessaliasNot yet recruitingPROMs | Validation Study | Postoperative Recovery | Cultural Adaptation | Quality of Recovery From AnaesthesiaGreece
-
Bayside HealthNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Australia: Theapeutic...CompletedQuality of Recovery From Anaesthesia | Effects of Nitrous Oxide Following Anaesthesia | Induced Endothelial DysfunctionAustralia
-
Jewish General HospitalRecruitingCesarean Section | Quality Improvement | Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia | Fasting ( 6H for Solid ; 2H for Clear Fluid )Canada
-
University Medicine GreifswaldDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, GermanyCompletedDelayed Recovery From AnaesthesiaGermany
-
Monash UniversityThe Alfred; Wellington HospitalRecruitingQuality of Life | Anaesthesia | Surgical Site Infection After Major Surgery | Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) | Major ComplicationsAustralia, New Zealand
-
Chosun University HospitalCompletedAnesthesia | Elderly Patients | Emergence From Anesthesia | Effects of Dexmedetomidine | Recovery From AnesthesiaKorea, Republic of
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalRecruitingArthroscopic Shoulder Surgery | Regional Anaesthesia | Opioid Consumption | Recovery Quality | Postoperative Pain Score | Hemidiaphragmatic ParalysisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfNot yet recruitingPostoperative Quality of Recovery | Postoperative Quality of Recovery in the Postanesthesia Care Unit
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedDelayed Recovery From Anaesthesia | Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Treatment | Cardiac Surgery Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Euthyroid Sick SyndromeEgypt
-
The Cleveland ClinicNational Health and Medical Research Council, AustraliaWithdrawnEffect of General Anesthetic Dose on Recovery From SurgeryUnited States