Correlation Between Diagnostic Nerve Block Response and Cryoneurolysis Outcome in Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders (CRYONIC)

April 21, 2026 updated by: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

The clinical study is titled the CRYONIC PROTOCOL, which stands for Cryotherapy for Neurolysis In Chronic Pain. It is structured as a prospective, multi-cohort observational study.

Purpose of the Study:

The overarching purpose of the CRYONIC PROTOCOL study is to assess the Correlation Between Diagnostic Nerve Block Response and Cryoneurolysis Outcome in Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders. The study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve cryoneurolysis, a minimally invasive technique that uses extreme cold to induce temporary nerve blocks, for patients with treatment-resistant chronic musculoskeletal pain.

The study also seeks to determine if cryoneurolysis itself leads to meaningful improvements in both pain intensity and functional ability in the included patient cohorts.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be over 18 year old
  • Adults (> 18y) with either chronic musculoskeletal pain (> 3 months; average NRS > 5/10) or painful/functionally limiting spasticity
  • Have a clinical stable condition, > 3months
  • Any medications must be maintained on a stable schedule- Able to understand study instructions and provide informed consent (ICF) in French or Dutch.Provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to cryoneurolysis such as a diagnosis of cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold haemoglobinuria, cold urticaria, Raynaud's disease, any form of peripheral neuropathy, open and or infected wounds of the affected limb
  • Patient's refusal to give consent to the procedure or to use of their data for research purposes.
  • Ongoing local or systemic infection before the procedure.
  • Predominantly neuropathic pain of the upper extremity as assessed with the Pain Detect questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chronic musculoskeletal pain group
Cryoneurolysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 3 months

Correlation between diagnostic nerve bloc and cryoneurolysis

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, range 0-10, higher scores indicate worse pain.

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Passive Range of Motion
Time Frame: 3 months
Joint angle measurement using a goniometer at the treated joint(s)
3 months
2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT)
Time Frame: 3 months

A functional test measuring walking endurance (distance walked in 2 minutes); a practical measure of ambulatory capacity

Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), outcome is total distance walked in meters in 2 minutes; there is no fixed minimum or maximum value, and higher distances indicate a better walking capacity.

3 months
Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: 3 months

Measures the time taken to stand from a chair, walk 3m, turn, return, and sit, capturing basic mobility, balance, and fall risk

Timed Up and Go (TUG), outcome is time to complete the task in seconds; there is no fixed minimum or maximum value, and higher times indicate worse mobility and higher fall risk.

3 months
Goal Attainment Scaling
Time Frame: 3 months

An individualized, patient-centered goal measure; goals are pre-defined and scored on a 5-point scale

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is an individualized outcome measure in which patient-specific goals are defined and rated on a 5-point ordinal scale from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much more than expected).

3 months
Modified Tardieu Scale
Time Frame: 3 months

Assesses spasticity across velocities; considered to have better construct validity for velocity-dependence than MAS

The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) is a clinical measure of spasticity, assessing a muscle's response to passive stretch at different velocities and recording both muscle reaction quality and the angle at which it occurs.

It uses standardized stretch velocities (V1 very slow, V2 gravity speed, V3 as fast as possible) and scores the quality of muscle reaction from 0 (no resistance) to 5 (joint immobile), while also documenting R1 (angle of catch at fast stretch) and R2 (full passive range at slow stretch) to distinguish dynamic spasticity from fixed contracture

3 months
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: 3 months

Clinician-rated 6-point ordinal scale quantifying muscle tone (resistance to passive movement)

The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 0-4 rating scale (with an additional grade 1+) that describes how much resistance is felt during passive movement of a muscle group. A score of 0 means no increase in muscle tone (normal tone), whereas a score of 4 indicates a rigid limb in flexion or extension. Higher scores on the MAS represent greater spasticity/increased muscle tone and therefore a worse outcome in terms of tone control.

3 months
Oswestry Disability Index (Low Back Pain)
Time Frame: 3 months

Measures disability related to low back pain across 10 items focused on daily functioning

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for Low Back Pain, score reported as a percentage from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate worse disability.

3 months
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Shoulder)
Time Frame: 3 months

A self-administered questionnaire consisting of 13 items (5 for pain, 8 for disability) scored from 0 to 10

Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), total score expressed as a percentage from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate worse shoulder pain and disability.

3 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Arm/Shoulder)
Time Frame: 3 months

A 30-item questionnaire evaluating upper limb function and symptoms

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, total score expressed from 0-100, where higher scores indicate greater upper-extremity disability and worse function.

3 months
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (Hip)
Time Frame: 3 months

Assesses hip-related pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and QoL across five subscales.

Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), subscale scores transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better hip-related health (less pain, fewer symptoms, better function, better quality of life).

3 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (Knee)
Time Frame: 3 months

Measures knee-related outcomes across five domains, including pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and QoL

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), subscale scores transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better knee-related health (less pain, fewer symptoms, better function, better quality of life).

3 months
Work Ability Index
Time Frame: 3 months

A 10-item questionnaire evaluating current work ability compared with the lifetime best, considering physical and mental demands and the impact of existing diseases

Work Ability Index (WAI), total score range 7-49 points, where higher scores indicate better work ability (7 = very poor work ability, 49 = excellent work ability).

3 months
Medication Quantification Scale (Version III)
Time Frame: 3 months

A validated tool to quantify the overall burden of pain medication based on pharmacological class, risk, and dose

Medication Quantification Scale (Version III), total score is an open-ended numeric value calculated by summing weighted scores for each pain medication; higher scores indicate a higher overall medication burden and greater potential detriment (worse outcome).

3 months
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months

Measures a patient's confidence in performing daily activities despite pain (10 items, scored 0 to 6)

Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), total score range 0-60, where higher scores indicate better pain self-efficacy (greater confidence in functioning and managing daily activities despite pain).

3 months
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (11 items)
Time Frame: 3 months
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), total score range 11-44, where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia (more fear of movement/(re)injury and stronger fear-avoidance beliefs).
3 months
EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels
Time Frame: 3 months

A standardized instrument measuring general health status across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression

EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), reported as a health state profile plus an index and a VAS: health states are coded from 11111-55555 and converted to a country-specific index value (typically ranging from negative values up to 1, where 1 indicates full health), and the EQ VAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better self-rated health.

3 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - 29 items
Time Frame: 3 months

Evaluates seven health domains, including physical function, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbance

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - 29 items (PROMIS-29 Profile), domain scores are converted to T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the reference population; higher T-scores indicate more of the domain being measured (e.g. higher = worse for anxiety, depression, pain interference, fatigue and sleep disturbance; higher = better for physical function and participation in social roles).

3 months
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 3 months

Assesses both pain severity (scale 0-10) and the interference of pain with daily activities

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), pain severity and pain interference scores each range from 0-10 (derived as the mean of 0-10 item ratings), where higher scores indicate worse pain intensity and greater pain-related interference with daily functioning.

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on cryoablation

Subscribe