Development of a Cloud-Based PRO (Patient-Reported Outcome) Management Program for Home-Based Cancer Pain Care

4th Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

This study aims to develop and pilot a cloud-based Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) management program for home-based cancer pain patients within a hospital setting. It is expected to serve as a reference for improving pain management in home-based cancer care and to provide insights for future related research as well as the broader application and dissemination of the program.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Yiwu, Zhejiang, China, 32200-
        • 4th Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Aged 18 years or older; Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer with concomitant pain requiring analgesic medication; Alert and oriented, free of psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment; Adequate comprehension, essentially normal vision and hearing, and basic literacy; Proficient in using a smartphone (patient or primary caregiver), willing to accept cloud-platform follow-up and participate throughout the study; Informed consent and voluntary participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

Presence of severe psychiatric disorders; Critically ill or debilitated patients with advanced-stage tumor who are unable to complete the study procedures.

Withdrawal Criteria:

Voluntary withdrawal or failure to complete the entire study process; Death during follow-up; Occurrence of accidents or clinical deterioration rendering continued participation infeasible; Request to withdraw for any reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
The control group received conventional telephone follow-up. Specifically, at 1 week and 3 weeks after discharge, ward follow-up nurses who had undergone standardized training conducted the follow-up using a pre-established checklist. The telephone calls covered pain intensity, location, medication usage, and adverse drug reactions.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Prior to discharge, a nurse instructed patients on using the cloud-based follow-up platform. Patients then reported outcomes weekly via the platform using the PROMIS-29 profile. The system automatically monitored this data against preset thresholds; any exceedance triggered an alert to the care team for immediate assessment. Based on the reported data, the system also pushed personalized education on pain management and medication. Follow-up calls provided further guidance, including on non-pharmacological techniques to complement analgesic therapy.
The intervention featured proactive monitoring of PRO data with threshold-based alerts, coupled with personalized patient education via the cloud and follow-up calls, to enhance timely care and self-management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: 1 month
Use the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to assess pain intensity, with scores ranging from 0 to 10, where a higher number indicates more severe pain.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication adherence
Time Frame: 1 month
Morisky questionnaire on medication adherence, with scores ranging from 0 to 8; a higher score indicates better medication adherence.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Huafang Zhang, MSN, 4th Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Pain

Clinical Trials on Proactive monitoring and patient education

Subscribe