Multidisciplinary Intervention for Non-Cancer Chronic Pain: Pilot Study (MICNP)

April 30, 2026 updated by: Victor Ortiz Mallasen

Multidisciplinary Intervention in Patients With Non-Cancer Chronic Pain in a Primary Care Center: Pilot Study

Introduction:

Non-cancer chronic pain (NCCP) persists beyond the injury that caused it, affecting approximately 20% of the global population (around 1.6 billion people) and 17-18% in Spain (about 8 million people). Its treatment is complex and often insufficient, highlighting the need for an integrated, multimodal, multidisciplinary approach coordinated between primary and hospital care.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention program combining pain neuroscience education, therapeutic physical exercise, and promotion of healthy habits, aiming to improve health-related quality of life in individuals with NCCP at the Benicàssim Health Center.

Methodology:

This is a quasi-experimental, before-and-after pilot study, non-randomized, without a control group, using a convenience sample of 12 participants. Sociodemographic, health-related, and clinical variables will be measured, including health-related quality of life, central sensitization, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, pain level, body mass index, sleep quality, perceived social support, anxiety, and depression. Measurements will be taken before the program, at completion, and at 3 months.

The intervention is a 6-week group program with 17 sessions, combining pain neuroscience education, individualized therapeutic exercises, and promotion of healthy habits. Data will be analyzed using SPSS v.29 with a significance level of p<0.05.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Castellón
      • Benicassim, Castellón, Spain, 12560
        • Benicassim Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals aged between 18 and 79 years.
  • Individuals diagnosed with non-cancer chronic pain lasting more than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with pain of oncologic origin.
  • Individuals who have experienced a fracture or undergone surgery within the past year.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Individuals without adequate understanding of the Spanish language.
  • Individuals with cognitive impairment that prevents them from performing the program's interventions.
  • Individuals with physical performance deficits that prevent them from carrying out the program's activities.
  • Individuals with urinary and/or fecal incontinence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Multidisciplinary Intervention
All participants will receive a multidisciplinary intervention program lasting 6 weeks, consisting of 17 sessions that combine pain neuroscience education, individualized therapeutic exercises, and promotion of healthy lifestyle habits. The program aims to improve pain management skills and health-related quality of life in patients with non-cancer chronic pain.
A 6-week multidisciplinary group program composed of 17 sessions combining pain neuroscience education, individualized therapeutic exercises, and promotion of healthy lifestyle habits. The intervention aims to improve pain management skills, physical function, and health-related quality of life in adults with non-cancer chronic pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-Related Quality of Life Measured With the EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week program, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L index value typically ranges from less than 0 (worse than death) to 1.00 (full health). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. The EQ-VAS ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week program, and 3 months after intervention completion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, 3 months.
Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 100-mm line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain intensity.
Baseline, post-intervention, 3 months.
Central Sensitization Assessed With the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Central sensitization will be assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), consisting of 25 items scored from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (maximum symptom severity). Higher scores indicate worse central sensitization.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Kinesiophobia Measured With the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Fear of movement will be assessed using the 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Scores range from 11 (lowest fear) to 44 (highest fear). Higher scores indicate worse kinesiophobia.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Pain Catastrophizing Measured With the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Pain catastrophizing will be measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), a 13-item questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no catastrophizing) to 52 (maximum catastrophizing). Higher scores indicate worse catastrophizing.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Sleep Quality Assessed With the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The global score ranges from 0 (better sleep quality) to 21 (poorer sleep quality). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Anxiety and Depression Assessed With the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Anxiety and depression will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which includes two subscales (anxiety and depression), each ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicate worse anxiety or depression.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Perceived Social Support Measured With the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.
Perceived social support will be assessed using the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Scores range from 8 (lowest support) to 40 (highest support). Higher scores indicate better perceived social support.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after intervention completion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PILOT-12PAT-2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non-cancer Pain

Clinical Trials on Multidisciplinary Intervention Program for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

Subscribe