Consistency of Fluid Tolerance Evaluation Methods and Their Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Shock

January 23, 2026 updated by: Ling Liu, Southeast University, China

Consistency of Fluid Tolerance Evaluation Methods and Their Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Shock Patients:A Prospective, Observational Study

This study aims to explore the feasibility and scientific validity of carotid-jugular Doppler in evaluating volume tolerance in shock patients (with the VExUS score as an important reference standard), and to conduct an in-depth analysis of the correlation between its monitoring indicators and patient prognosis.The primary endpoint is comparison of the agreement between hands-free carotid-jugular Doppler and the VExUS score in evaluating volume tolerance.The secondary endpoint is correlation between volume tolerance assessed by hands-free carotid-jugular Doppler and the clinical outcomes of shock patients.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to the ICU

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Shock patients admitted to the ICU are defined as those with persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or a decrease of ≥ 40 mmHg from the baseline blood pressure) accompanied by signs of tissue hypoperfusion.
  • Age ≥ 18 years old.
  • The patient or their legal representatives signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe pulmonary circulatory disorders such as severe pulmonary hypertension and acute pulmonary embolism.
  • Patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
  • Patients with severe neck trauma or deformity that affects Doppler examination of cervical arteries and veins, or those with anatomical contraindications preventing evaluation of at least one cervical artery or vein.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with diseases that may interfere with abdominal ultrasound examination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hands-free Carotid Artery and Vein Doppler Parameters
Time Frame: Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Elevate the patient's upper body to 45°, keep the legs flat, place the long axis of the probe perpendicular to the carotid vessels (with the probe height not exceeding the upper edge of the thyroid cartilage), locate the optimal signals of the common carotid artery and internal jugular vein waveforms, and then fix the probe.
Time of shock in ICU within 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PiCCO
Time Frame: Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Inject cold saline through central venous catheterization, sense temperature changes via arterial catheter, and obtain hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac output by combining thermodilution and pulse contour analysis.
Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Venous Excess Ultrasound Score
Time Frame: Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Evaluate the diameter, waveform, etc. of the inferior vena cava, hepatic veins, portal vein, and intrarenal veins sequentially via ultrasound, and comprehensively derive a grade ranging from 0 to 3.Grade 0: No congestion; Grade 1: Mild congestion; Grade 2: Moderate congestion; Grade 3: Severe congestion.
Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Time Frame: Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Attach electrodes to the patient's limbs, input basic information, measure impedance of multiple parts with multi-frequency technology, and quickly obtain parameters such as body composition.
Time of shock in ICU within 3 days
Duration of shock
Time Frame: Time of shock in ICU within 28 days
Time of shock in ICU within 28 days
Time of shock in ICU within 28 days
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation During ICU Admission
up to 24 weeks
Total Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Total Length of Hospital Stay
up to 24 weeks
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Length of ICU stay
up to 24 weeks
mortality of 28 days
Time Frame: Incidence of death during 28 days
Incidence of death during 28 days
Incidence of death during 28 days
In-hospital Mortality
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
In-hospital Mortality
up to 24 weeks
Vasoactive Agent Dosage
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Vasoactive Agent Dosage During ICU Admission
up to 24 weeks
Time without vasoactive agents within 28 days
Time Frame: Time without vasoactive agents within 28 days
Time without vasoactive agents within 28 days
Time without vasoactive agents within 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Subscribe