Pain Neuroscience Education for the Management of Chronic Pain in Elite Volleyball Players With Chronic Shoulder Pain

January 30, 2026 updated by: Aziz DENGİZ, Pamukkale University

Pain Neuroscience Education for the Management of Chronic Pain in Elite Volleyball Players With Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study investigated the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain intensity, pain knowledge, and pain catastrophizing in elite volleyball players with chronic shoulder pain. Participants were assigned to either a PNE group or a control group, both continuing regular sports training, while the PNE group additionally received six weeks of structured education sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study represents a theory-informed intervention examining chronic shoulder pain in elite athletes from a modern pain science perspective. Instead of focusing solely on peripheral tissue pathology, the research is grounded in the biopsychosocial model of pain, emphasizing the role of central pain processing, pain beliefs, and maladaptive cognitive responses such as catastrophizing. In high-level volleyball players, where repetitive overhead loading and performance demands often lead athletes to continue training despite persistent symptoms, pain may become strongly influenced by cognitive and educational factors. Within this context, the study investigates whether modifying the understanding and interpretation of pain through Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) can influence both the sensory and cognitive dimensions of the pain experience.

Methodologically, the study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial. Elite volleyball players with chronic shoulder pain were randomly allocated to either an education-based intervention group or a control group. Both groups maintained their regular sports training routines, ensuring that any observed effects could be attributed to the educational intervention rather than changes in physical load. The intervention consisted of a structured six-week PNE program delivered in repeated sessions, focusing on explaining pain mechanisms, central sensitization, and the non-linear relationship between tissue damage and pain. Outcomes were selected to reflect both physical and cognitive domains of pain: pain intensity, pain-related knowledge, and pain catastrophizing were measured before and after the intervention period to evaluate multidimensional changes associated with the educational approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Muş, Turkey (Türkiye), 49100
        • Muş Alparslan University, Faculty of Sport Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being an elite volleyball player actively competing in a professional club
  • Experiencing shoulder and/or arm pain for at least three months
  • Providing voluntary informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in volleyball at an amateur level
  • Presence of pain in regions other than the shoulder and arm
  • History of cancer or pregnancy
  • Pain originating from neurological, cardiogenic, or rheumatological conditions
  • Failure to complete the pain neuroscience education (PNE) program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pain Neuroscience group
Participants assigned to this arm received pain neuroscience education (PNE) in addition to their regular sports training program. The PNE intervention was delivered over six weeks, with two sessions per week, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, and focused on the neurobiology and neurophysiology of pain, pain mechanisms, and the relationship between pain and tissue damage.

Pain Neuroscience Education is an educational intervention aimed at improving individuals' understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pain. The education focuses on contemporary pain science concepts, including the role of the central nervous system, pain modulation, central sensitization, and the distinction between tissue damage and pain perception.

The PNE program was delivered through structured sessions using verbal explanations, visual materials, metaphors, and examples relevant to daily life and sports activities. The content emphasized that pain is a protective output of the nervous system rather than a direct indicator of tissue injury, and that psychological, cognitive, and contextual factors can influence pain intensity and persistence.

Participants were encouraged to reconceptualize pain, reduce maladaptive beliefs and fear related to movement, and develop a more adaptive understanding of their pain experience. The education was tailored to elite volley

No Intervention: Control group
Participants in the control group continued their regular sports training programs throughout the study period and did not receive pain neuroscience education or any additional educational or therapeutic intervention related to pain management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks"
The Visual Analog Scale is a unidimensional tool used to assess pain intensity. Participants rate their perceived pain by marking a point on a 10-cm (or 100-mm) horizontal line, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks"
Revised Pain Neurophysiology Questionnaire (R-PNQ)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Revised Pain Neurophysiology Questionnaire (R-PNQ)

The R-PNQ is a 12-item questionnaire designed to assess individuals' knowledge of the biology and physiology of pain based on contemporary pain science. Each item is answered as true, false, or undecided. Correct responses are scored as one point, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater pain neurophysiology knowledge. A validated Turkish version of the questionnaire was used.

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
The PCS is a 13-item self-report questionnaire used to evaluate maladaptive cognitive and emotional responses to pain. It consists of three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Higher scores reflect greater levels of pain catastrophizing
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aziz DENGİZ, Assist. Prof., Muş Alparslan University
  • Study Director: Harun KOÇ, Assist. Prof., Muş Alparslan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. Pain catastrophizing scale. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(4):524-532.
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S240-S252.
  • Catley MJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire Rasch analysis. J Pain. 2013;14(8):818-827.
  • Sastre-Munar A, Romero-Franco N. Pain education in youth athletes. Healthcare. 2024;12(2):215.
  • Sánchez-Robalino A, Sinchi-Sinchi H, Ramírez A. Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education in physical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2025;15(6):658.
  • Cuenca-Martínez F, Suso-Martí L, Calatayud J, Ferrer-Sargues FJ, Muñoz-Alarcos V, Alba-Quesada P, et al. Pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1272068.
  • Gajardo-Burgos R, Valdebenito-Tejos C, Gálvez-García G, Bascour-Sandoval C. Pain and psychological readiness to return to sport in elite volleyball players. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2492.
  • 2. Alaiti RK, Reis FJ. Pain in athletes: current knowledge and challenges. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022;17(6):981.
  • 1. Malfliet A, Leysen L, Pas R, Kuppens K, Nijs J, Van Wilgen P, et al. Modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: applied to post-cancer, paediatric and sports-related pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(4):225-232.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Management

Clinical Trials on Pain neuroscience education

Subscribe