- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07484776
Metabolic Flexibility in Patients With Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer
Metabolic Flexibility in Patients With Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer and the Possible Effect of a Physical Exercise Intervention
Cancer is considered a major global public health problem. It was estimated that in 2022 approximately 19.9 million new cancer cases were diagnosed worldwide, and this number is expected to increase over the next two decades to 28.0 million (1). Specifically, breast cancer (BC) represents the highest incidence worldwide, with approximately 2.3 million new cases diagnosed in 2022 (1).
A higher incidence of BC is observed in developed countries, which may be due to high rates of obesity, alcohol and tobacco consumption, early onset of puberty, the use of contraceptives and hormonal therapies, low levels of physical activity, and giving birth at later ages (2,3). In addition to the factors mentioned above, hereditary factors and age also represent risk factors for cancer development (2,3). Finally, the presence of family members with breast and/or ovarian cancer carrying mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, among others, which increase the likelihood of tumor proliferation, as well as age over 40 years, also increase the probability of developing BC (2,3).
Specifically, there is a molecular subtype that does not respond to hormonal receptors or HER2 and may be more aggressive and have fewer specific treatment options, known as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Metabolic flexibility (MF) is described as the ability of the body to adapt to energy demands in different contexts. During chemotherapy and after surgery, significant changes may occur, such as increased body fat, loss of muscle mass, cancer-related fatigue, metabolic alterations, and decreased quality of life. These changes may persist even years after treatment and may affect both well-being and recovery. It could therefore be suggested that metabolic flexibility in muscle fibers in patients with TNBC may be reduced, particularly in patients undergoing systemic treatment, with potential difficulties adapting to different intensities and energy demands in daily life. A decrease in muscle metabolic flexibility would also imply a reduction in muscle strength and physical function, significantly impairing quality of life.
Therefore, the main objective of this study is to analyze muscle metabolic flexibility at different stages of early disease and to evaluate whether different types of exercise training can improve these outcomes.
To achieve this, assessments will be conducted at four time points during the early stages of the disease: at diagnosis, after neoadjuvant treatment, after surgery, and following an exercise intervention. The assessments will include blood analyses, body composition measurements, cycling exercise tests to evaluate oxygen consumption and the utilization of fat and glucose, measurements of muscle strength, and questionnaires assessing fatigue and quality of life.
After surgery, participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups for 12 weeks: a control group receiving general physical activity recommendations; a moderate-intensity cardiovascular exercise group focused on maximal fat oxidation; a high-intensity interval cardiovascular exercise group; and a progressive resistance training group. The final objective is to determine which type of exercise most effectively improves metabolic flexibility, muscle strength, body composition, and overall well-being.
Participation in the study is voluntary and does not affect standard medical care. All assessments and training sessions will be supervised by qualified exercise professionals to ensure participant safety.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Cancer is recognized as a major global socio-health issue. In 2022, it was estimated that approximately 19.9 million new cancer cases were diagnosed worldwide, and this number is projected to rise to 28.0 million over the next two decades (1). Breast cancer (BC) specifically exhibits the highest incidence globally, with around 2.3 million new cases reported in 2022 (1). According to the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), 37,682 new BC cases are expected to be diagnosed in Spain in 2025 (1).
Currently, BC subtypes are classified based on their molecular characteristics (2,3). The triple-negative (TN) molecular subtype is defined by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC accounts for 10-20% of invasive BC cases and is considered more biologically and clinically aggressive than other subtypes (2,3). It also presents a poorer prognosis and more limited treatment options (2,3).
Metabolic flexibility (MF) refers to the body's capacity to adapt to energy demands under varying conditions (4,5). Mitochondria, as the primary cellular organelles responsible for energy production, facilitate substrate oxidation to generate ATP according to required intensity levels (5). In contrast, metabolic inflexibility in muscle fibers is characterized by impaired lactate clearance, reduced lipid oxidation capacity, and rapid switching from fat to carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation (6).
Some studies suggest that cancer induces systemic mitochondrial dysfunction across multiple tissues, influenced both by disease pathophysiology and the toxicity of oncological treatments (7). Additionally, decreased PGC-1α levels have been observed in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PGC-1α is a key transcriptional coactivator regulating mitochondrial biogenesis, and its reduction may contribute to inefficient energy production, resulting in muscle dysfunction and loss of both mass and function in cancer patients (7,8).
Moreover, women with BC who undergo chemotherapy are more likely to gain fat mass compared to age-matched women without BC (7,9,10,11). Excess adipose tissue is linked to metabolic disease and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, further contributing to mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction. Increased fat mass has also been associated with higher risks of recurrence, disease progression, and mortality in BC studies (7,9,10,11).
Evidence highlights the crucial role physical exercise plays in cellular metabolism. Studies demonstrate that exercise significantly influences glucose levels, insulin resistance, growth factors, fat oxidation rates, and lactate clearance (12,13). Dysregulation of these factors may activate tumor signaling pathways, posing a risk for tumor proliferation (12,13,14). Consequently, modulating metabolism through physical activity could be fundamental in influencing cancer progression (12,13,14).
Exercise is key for activating the AMPK signaling pathway, an enzyme triggered under high-energy demands. Activation of AMPK promotes GLUT4 translocation, enhancing glycolysis, fatty acid (FA) oxidation, and mitochondrial biogenesis, including upregulation of PGC-1α (15,16). Continuous endurance training has been shown to sustain AMPK activation for hours post-exercise, with longer durations producing greater benefits (15,17). Similarly, high-intensity cardiovascular training appears to elevate AMPK levels hours after the activity (15,17).
Alongside increased AMPK and PGC-1α activity, training has been associated with greater mitochondrial content and function in muscle fibers (4,6,16,18). This enhances fatty acid oxidation capacity in mitochondria, thereby improving metabolic flexibility (4,6,18). Altogether, these adaptations increase the ability of muscle fibers-now with more mitochondria-to utilize multiple substrates efficiently, improving MF (4,6,18,19).
Recent research also indicates that increasing muscle strength and preventing fat mass gain are essential for maintaining metabolic health and optimizing treatment response, as they are associated with improvements in markers such as insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, and acute anti-inflammatory responses (20,21). Importantly, exercise-induced benefits on mitochondrial and metabolic health appear independent of weight loss from fat reduction (20,21).
In summary, cancer patients-particularly those with TNBC-may experience systemic metabolic dysfunction due to disease pathophysiology, treatment toxicity, and suboptimal lifestyle habits (4,5,7,8,10,14,18,22,23,24,25,26). However, to date, no studies have described the metabolic response to exercise in this population.
Thus, the primary aim of this study is to describe the metabolic flexibility of patients with early-stage TNBC across different phases of the disease. This approach may allow indirect determination of the preferred energy substrate in muscle fibers and identification of the optimal intensity for fatty acid oxidation to improve metabolic profiles in these patients.
Additionally, the study will evaluate the effects of two cardiovascular training interventions and one strength training intervention on the metabolic profile of patients with early-stage TNBC.
This pilot study will initially adopt a descriptive, longitudinal design, followed by an open, randomized experimental phase in early-stage TNBC patients. First, a descriptive observational analysis will be conducted, followed by an experimental study with four groups using a pre-post design, including a control group (CG).
A group consisting exclusively of newly diagnosed TNBC patients (D1) meeting inclusion criteria will be established. This group will receive only general physical activity recommendations provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) during neoadjuvant treatment and prior to breast surgery.
The sample will include 40 TNBC patients selected by convenience sampling from Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (Av. de Orellana, s/n, 28914 Leganés, Madrid), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (Av. Gran Vía del Este, 80, Vallecas, 28031 Madrid), and Hospital de la Princesa (Calle de Diego de León, 62, Salamanca, 28006 Madrid), all located in the Community of Madrid.
To determine the most effective exercise intervention for enhancing metabolic flexibility and function, the study will consider: the group with the highest number of patients demonstrating decreased RER and lactate during the exercise test (ET) at the end of each incremental protocol stage post-surgery compared with pre-intervention; the group with the most patients showing increased FATox and CHOox, as well as associated kcal values, at the same stage-defined ET points post-surgery; and the experimental group exhibiting statistically significant changes in these variables.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28670
- Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Female between 20-55 years of age.
- Confirmed histological new diagnosis of stage I to III triple-negative breast cancer and a candidate to receive systemic neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy.
- Must not have started systemic treatment for the neoplastic disease.
- Participating in any external physical exercise program or sports activities during the experimental study phase.
- Inability to understand and provide written Informed Consent (IC)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having neurological or orthopedic disease at the time of recruitment or during the study evaluation and intervention.
- Inability to understand Spanish language.
- Presenting absolute contraindications for performing a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) such as heart failure, myocarditis, acute pericarditis, severe aortic stenosis, aortic dissection, vascular toxicity, uncontrolled severe arterial hypertension, uncontrolled severe cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary thromboembolism, or severe anemia.
- Have relative contraindications for performing a CPET such as bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias, moderate valvular stenosis, inability to perform physical or mental exertion, chronic infectious diseases, musculoskeletal disabilities, ventricular aneurysm, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, or severe arterial hypertension.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Receives the general physical activity recommendations from the WHO
|
|
|
Experimental: Cardiovascular training group at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax)
Group performing cardiovascular training at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax) through continuous training on a stationary bicycle at a low-to-moderate intensity.
There will be a progressive increase in the number of minutes throughout the intervention.
|
Group performing cardiovascular training at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax) twice per week for 12 weeks
|
|
Experimental: Cardiovascular training group at maximal aerobic power (MAP)
Group performing cardiovascular training at maximal aerobic power (MAP) through high-intensity interval training on a stationary bicycle.
There will be a progressive increase in the minutes performed at MAP throughout the intervention
|
Group performing cardiovascular training at maximal aerobic power (MAP) twice per week for 12 weeks
|
|
Experimental: Resistance training group
Participants in resistance training group will follow a 12-week strength training program with progressive loads, twice a week. The intervention in this group will be based on the key training principles in the field of health: the principle of individualization, the principle of supercompensation, and the principle of specificity. There will be a two-week familiarization period that will take into account the patient's initial level, starting with moderate loads to reach high loads up to 1 repetition in reserve (RIR 1) by the end of the intervention. |
Group performing progressive resistance training twice per week for 12 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
The respiratory exchange ratio is the ratio of carbon dioxide production (VCO2) to oxygen consumption (VO2) measured during respiration.
It is obtained through indirect calorimetry during rest or exercise and reflects substrate utilization (fat or carbohydrate oxidation).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Fat Oxidation (FATox)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Fat oxidation refers to the rate at which fatty acids are used as an energy substrate by the body during rest or exercise.
It is typically estimated from oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) using indirect calorimetry.
FATox is commonly expressed in grams per minute (g/min).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Carbohydrate Oxidation (CHOox)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Carbohydrate oxidation refers to the rate at which carbohydrates are metabolized to produce energy during rest or physical exercise.
It is estimated using oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) measured through indirect calorimetry.
CHOox is typically expressed in grams per minute (g/min).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Energy Expenditure
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
This variable represents the amount of energy derived from fat and CHO oxidation during rest or exercise.
It is estimated using oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) obtained through indirect calorimetry.
Energy expenditure is typically expressed in kilocalories (kcal).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Lactate Concentration
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Lactate concentration represents the amount of lactate present in the blood during rest or exercise.
It is measured using the Lactate Plus device through capillary puncture of the middle or ring finger of the non-dominant hand and is expressed in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
This variable provides information about anaerobic metabolism and exercise intensity.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Resting Energy Expenditure (REE)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Resting energy expenditure refers to the amount of energy the body expends at rest to maintain essential physiological functions such as breathing, circulation, and cellular metabolism.
It is typically measured using indirect calorimetry at rest and is commonly expressed in kilocalories per day (kcal/day).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Power
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Power will be assessed at different physiological stages during the exercise test, including submaximal and maximal intensities.
Measurements are obtained using a cycle ergometer and expressed in watts (W).
This variable provides insight into exercise capacity and performance at varying intensities.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2máx)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Maximal oxygen consumption represents the highest rate at which oxygen can be taken up, transported, and utilized by the body during intense exercise.
It is measured using indirect calorimetry during a graded exercise test and is expressed in milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute (mL/kg/min).
VO2max reflects an individual's aerobic fitness and cardiorespiratory capacity.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Ventilatory Volume (VE)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
VE is the total volume of air inhaled and exhaled per minute.
It is measured using indirect calorimetry and expressed in liters per minute (L/min).
VE reflects ventilatory response during rest or exercise.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Oxygen Consumption (VO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
VO2 is the volume of oxygen consumed per minute.
It is measured using indirect calorimetry and expressed in mL/kg/min when adjusted for body weight.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Carbon Dioxide Production (VCO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
VCO2 is the volume of carbon dioxide produced per minute.
It is measured via indirect calorimetry and expressed mL/kg/min when adjusted for body weight.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PETCO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
PETCO2 represents the partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of exhalation, measured using indirect calorimetry during exercise.
It is expressed in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and provides information about ventilatory efficiency, respiratory control, and gas exchange.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Ventilatory Oxygen Equivalent (VE/VO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
The ventilatory oxygen equivalent represents the ratio of minute ventilation (VE) to oxygen consumption (VO2).
It is measured during rest or exercise using indirect calorimetry and expressed in liters of air per liter of O2 (L/L).
VE/VO2 reflects ventilatory efficiency in relation to oxygen uptake.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Ventilatory Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (VE/VCO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
The ventilatory carbon dioxide equivalent represents the ratio of minute ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide production (VCO2).
It is measured during rest or exercise using indirect calorimetry and expressed in liters of air per liter of CO2 (L/L).
VE/VCO2 indicates ventilatory efficiency in relation to carbon dioxide elimination.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
HRV represents the variation in time intervals between consecutive heartbeats, reflecting autonomic nervous system activity.
It is measured using a Polar H10 heart rate monitor and expressed in milliseconds (ms).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Heart Rate (HR)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Heart rate represents the number of heartbeats per minute and reflects cardiovascular activity.
It is typically measured using an electrocardiogram (ECG) or heart rate monitor and expressed in beats per minute (bpm).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Oxygenated Haemoglobin (HbO2)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
HbO2 represents the concentration of oxygen-bound hemoglobin in the blood or tissue.
It is typically measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and expressed in micromoles (µM) or arbitrary units, reflecting tissue oxygenation levels.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Deoxygenated Haemoglobin (HHb)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
HHb represents the concentration of hemoglobin not bound to oxygen.
Measured via NIRS, it provides information about oxygen extraction and utilization in the tissue and is expressed in µM or arbitrary units.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
% Tissue Saturation Index (%TSI)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Percentage of oxygen saturation in the microvascular tissue measured using a portable Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) device.
Reflects the balance between local oxygen delivery and utilization in muscle tissue.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Body Mass Index (IMC)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
BMI is a measure that relates a person's weight to their height to estimate body fatness.
It is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2) and is commonly used to classify underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity.
In this study, it was measured using bone densitometry with the Hologic Discovery QDR Wi.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Fat Mass
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Fat mass represents the total amount of body fat in an individual.
It is measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and is expressed in kilograms (kg) or as a percentage of total body weight (%).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Muscle Mass
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Muscle mass represents the total weight of skeletal muscles in the body.
It is measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and is expressed in kilograms (kg).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Bone Mass
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Bone mass represents the total weight of bone tissue in the body.
It is measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and is expressed in kilograms (kg), providing information about bone health and density.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
BMD represents the concentration of mineral content in a given area of bone, reflecting bone strength and health.
It is typically measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and expressed in grams per square centimeter (g/cm2).
BMD is commonly used to assess osteoporosis risk and bone quality.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Total Visceral Fat Volume (cm3VAT)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Total visceral fat volume represents the amount of fat stored within the abdominal cavity surrounding internal organs.
In this study, it is assessed using DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and expressed in cubic centimeters (cm³).
This variable provides information on metabolic risk and cardiometabolic health.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR; TMB in Spanish)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
BMR represents the energy expenditure of the body at rest necessary to maintain essential physiological functions, such as breathing, circulation, and cellular metabolism.
In this study, it is measured under standardized resting conditions through indirect calorimetry and expressed in kilocalories per day (kcal/day).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Phase Angle (PhA)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Phase angle is a measure derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) that reflects cell membrane integrity and overall cellular health.
It is calculated from the relationship between resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) of body tissues and is expressed in degrees (°).
Higher PhA values generally indicate better cellular function and body composition quality, while lower values may be associated with malnutrition or disease.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Glucose
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Glucose represents the concentration of sugar in the blood, which serves as the primary source of energy for the body's cells.
It is measured using the Freestyle Optium Neo device with test strips and expressed in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
Blood glucose levels provide information about metabolic status, energy availability, and glycemic control.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Lipid Profile
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL), Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL), Triglycerides (TG) and Total Cholesterol (TC), represent the concentrations of different types of fats and cholesterol in the blood.
They are measured using the Afinion 2 device and expressed in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
Higher HDL levels are associated with lower cardiovascular risk, while elevated LDL, TG, and TC levels are linked to increased metabolic and cardiovascular risk.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
HbA1c represents the percentage of hemoglobin that is glycated, reflecting the average blood glucose levels over the previous 2-3 months.
In this study, HbA1c was measured using the Afinion 2 analyzer and is expressed as a percentage (%).
It provides an indicator of long-term glycemic control.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
CRP is a protein produced by the liver in response to inflammation, serving as a marker of systemic inflammatory status.
In this study, CRP was measured using the Afinion 2 analyzer and is expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
It helps assess inflammatory processes and cardiovascular risk.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Maximum Strenght
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Maximum upper limb strength (SmaxUL), maximum right lower limb strength (SmaxRL), and maximum left lower limb strength (SmaxLL) represent the highest force generated by each respective limb during isometric strength tests.
All measurements are conducted using a Kinvent dynamometer and are expressed in kilograms (kg).
These variables reflect the maximal muscular capacity of the upper and lower limbs and allow for assessment of inter-limb strength and overall muscular performance.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Maximum Upper Limb Strength Time (TSmaxUL)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Time required to reach maximal voluntary force during an upper limb isometric contraction measured with a K-Force Kinvent dynamometer.
All measurements are conducted using a Kinvent dynamometer, with TSmaxUL values expressed in seconds (s), providing comprehensive information on muscle activation speed, explosive strength, and neuromuscular performance.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Upper Limb Rate of Force Development (RFD_UL)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Speed at which force is generated during an upper limb contraction assessed using a K-Force Kinvent dynamometer.
The RFD_UL values are expressed in kilograms per second (Kg/s).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Lower Limb Rate of Force Development (RFD_LL)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Speed at which force is produced during a lower limb contraction measured with a K-Force Kinvent dynamometer.
The RFD_LL values are expressed in kilograms per second (Kg/s).
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Lower Limb Asymmetry (AsymLL)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Lower limb asymmetry (AsymLL) represents the difference in strength or force production between the right and left lower limbs during isometric or dynamic tests.
It is calculated from measurements such as maximum lower limb strength or rate of force development and is typically expressed as a percentage (%).
This variable provides insight into inter-limb imbalances, potential injury risk, and neuromuscular performance.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Quality of Life (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Cancer-specific questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life across multiple domains including physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning, as well as symptoms.
It contains 30 items grouped into functional scales, symptom scales, and a global health status scale.
Items are transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual; higher scores indicate better functioning/global quality of life but greater symptom severity in symptom scales.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Quality of life (QLQ-BR45)
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Breast cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life, including symptoms, treatment side effects, body image, sexual functioning, and future perspective.
It contains 45 items organized into functional and symptom scales.
Items are transformed to a 0-100 scale following the EORTC scoring manual; higher scores indicate better functioning/global quality of life and higher symptom burden for symptom scales.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
|
Fatigue
Time Frame: 1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Questionnaire designed to assess the impact of fatigue on physical performance and daily activities, evaluating perceived exertion, endurance, and functional limitations.
Items are rated on Likert scales and summed or averaged according to the questionnaire instructions; higher scores indicate greater fatigue and reduced performance.
|
1 week after diagnosis (baseline); 1 week after completion of neoadjuvant treatment; 4 weeks after breast surgery or upon surgeon approval; and 1 week after completion of the exercise intervention or control period.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brea Lidia, Profesor titular UEM, Universidad Europea de Madrid
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available.
- Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM. Metabolic Flexibility in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2017 May 2;25(5):1027-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.015.
- Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn NA, Muller JM, Pyke CM, Baade PD. The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;36(3):237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
- Hallsworth K, Fattakhova G, Hollingsworth KG, Thoma C, Moore S, Taylor R, Day CP, Trenell MI. Resistance exercise reduces liver fat and its mediators in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease independent of weight loss. Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1278-83. doi: 10.1136/gut.2011.242073. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
- Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, Chaitman B, Eckel R, Fleg J, Froelicher VF, Leon AS, Pina IL, Rodney R, Simons-Morton DA, Williams MA, Bazzarre T. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001 Oct 2;104(14):1694-740. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.095960. No abstract available.
- Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, Amsterdam EA, Bittner V, Franklin BA, Gulanick M, Laing ST, Stewart KJ; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):572-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185214. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
- Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 26;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. eCollection 2018.
- Delsoglio M, Dupertuis YM, Oshima T, van der Plas M, Pichard C. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of a new generation indirect calorimeter in canopy dilution mode. Clin Nutr. 2020 Jun;39(6):1927-1934. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
- Zhu C, Ma H, He A, Li Y, He C, Xia Y. Exercise in cancer prevention and anticancer therapy: Efficacy, molecular mechanisms and clinical information. Cancer Lett. 2022 Sep 28;544:215814. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215814. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
- Schaffarczyk M, Rogers B, Reer R, Gronwald T. Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;22(17):6536. doi: 10.3390/s22176536.
- Cocks K, Wells JR, Johnson C, Schmidt H, Koller M, Oerlemans S, Velikova G, Pinto M, Tomaszewski KA, Aaronson NK, Exall E, Finbow C, Fitzsimmons D, Grant L, Groenvold M, Tolley C, Wheelwright S, Bottomley A; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group. Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jan;178:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.026. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
- Smith RL, Soeters MR, Wust RCI, Houtkooper RH. Metabolic Flexibility as an Adaptation to Energy Resources and Requirements in Health and Disease. Endocr Rev. 2018 Aug 1;39(4):489-517. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00211.
- McManus CJ, Collison J, Cooper CE. Performance comparison of the MOXY and PortaMon near-infrared spectroscopy muscle oximeters at rest and during exercise. J Biomed Opt. 2018 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.1.015007.
- McLester CN, Nickerson BS, Kliszczewicz BM, McLester JR. Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women. J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
- Paulo AC, Forjaz CLM, Mion D Jr, Silva GV, Barros S, Tricoli V. Blood Pressure Increase in Hypertensive Individuals During Resistance Training Protocols With Equated Work to Rest Ratio. Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 29;11:481. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00481. eCollection 2020.
- Davis SN, Tate D, Hedrington MS. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia and exercise-associated autonomic dysfunction. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:281-91; discussion 291-2.
- Myers J, Arena R, Franklin B, Pina I, Kraus WE, McInnis K, Balady GJ; American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Recommendations for clinical exercise laboratories: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2009 Jun 23;119(24):3144-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192520. Epub 2009 Jun 1. No abstract available.
- Riebe D, Franklin BA, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Whitfield GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updating ACSM's Recommendations for Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Nov;47(11):2473-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000664.
- Kambic T, Hansen D, Eijsvogels TMH. High-load resistance training in cardiac rehabilitation: is it time to debunk old clinical dogmas for a better clinical tomorrow? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Sep 6;31(12):e92-e94. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae079. No abstract available.
- Ferreira IC, Souza MA, Junior MA, Silveira-Nunes G, Barbosa MA, Barbosa AC. Validity of a portable hanging scale to assess the isometric muscle strength during knee movement. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:433-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
- Olds M, McLaine S, Magni N. Validity and Reliability of the Kinvent Handheld Dynamometer in the Athletic Shoulder Test. J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Jun 7;32(7):764-772. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0444. Print 2023 Sep 1.
- Akinyemiju T, Oyekunle T, Salako O, Gupta A, Alatise O, Ogun G, Adeniyi A, Deveaux A, Hall A, Ayandipo O, Olajide T, Olasehinde O, Arowolo O, Adisa A, Afuwape O, Olusanya A, Adegoke A, Tollefsbol TO, Arnett D, Muehlbauer MJ, Newgard CB; H3 Africa Kidney Research Network; Daramola A. Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Breast Cancer by Molecular Subtype: Analysis of the MEND Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jun;22(4):e463-e472. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
- Howard FM, Olopade OI. Epidemiology of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review. Cancer J. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000500.
- Karim AM, Eun Kwon J, Ali T, Jang J, Ullah I, Lee YG, Park DW, Park J, Jeang JW, Kang SC. Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and modern vaccine-based treatment strategies. Biochem Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;212:115545. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115545. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
- Oshima T, Dupertuis YM, Delsoglio M, Graf S, Heidegger CP, Pichard C. In vitro validation of indirect calorimetry device developed for the ICALIC project against mass spectrometry. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Aug;32:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 23.
- Oshima T, Delsoglio M, Dupertuis YM, Singer P, De Waele E, Veraar C, Heidegger CP, Wernermann J, Wischmeyer PE, Berger MM, Pichard C. The clinical evaluation of the new indirect calorimeter developed by the ICALIC project. Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct;39(10):3105-3111. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
- Van Hooren B, Souren T, Bongers BC. Accuracy of respiratory gas variables, substrate, and energy use from 15 CPET systems during simulated and human exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Jan;34(1):e14490. doi: 10.1111/sms.14490. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
- Nye CJ, Musulin SE, Hanel RM, Mariani CL. Evaluation of the Lactate Plus monitor for plasma lactate concentration measurement in dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2017 Jan;27(1):66-70. doi: 10.1111/vec.12557. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
- Hanna R, Gosalia J, Demalis A, Hobson Z, McCully KK, Irving BA, Mookerjee S, Vairo GL, Proctor DN. Bilateral NIRS measurements of muscle mitochondrial capacity: Feasibility and repeatability. Physiol Rep. 2021 Apr;9(8):e14826. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14826.
- Lakenman PLM, van der Hoven B, van Bommel J, Olieman JF, Joosten KFM. The usefulness of a new indirect calorimeter in critically ill adult patients. Clin Nutr. 2024 Oct;43(10):2267-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.07.048. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
- Van Hoovels L, Massa B, Stavelin A, De Meyer H, De Schrijver P, Van Laethem V, Barglazan D, Gruson D, Hopstaken R, Peeters B, Van Hoof V, Verdonck A, Verbakel JY. Analytical performance and user-friendliness of four commercially available point-of-care devices for C-reactive protein. Clin Chim Acta. 2024 Jun 15;560:119737. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119737. Epub 2024 May 18.
- Li B, Kumar A, Finlay C, van Drimmelen M, Barnes E, Southby S, Florkowski C. Verification of point-of-care analysers for C-reactive protein, lipid studies and glycated haemoglobin. Pathology. 2023 Dec;55(7):989-999. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
- Getu MA, Wang P, Kantelhardt EJ, Seife E, Chen C, Addissie A. Translation and validation of the EORTC QLQ-BR45 among Ethiopian breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02511-9.
- Baro E, Carulla J, Cassinello J, Colomer R, Mata JG, Gascon P, Gasquet JA, Rodriguez CA, Valentin V. Psychometric properties of the Perform Questionnaire: a brief scale for assessing patient perceptions of fatigue in cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011 May;19(5):657-66. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0878-x. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
- Tanner RK, Fuller KL, Ross ML. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jun;109(3):551-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
- Heuberger JAAC, Gal P, Stuurman FE, de Muinck Keizer WAS, Mejia Miranda Y, Cohen AF. Repeatability and predictive value of lactate threshold concepts in endurance sports. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206846. eCollection 2018.
- Ratia N, Lantto H, Rotgers E, Kouri VP, Auranen M, Luukkonen R, Piirila P. Lactate and ammonia measurements during cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its recovery phase-Consideration of age and sex in its interpretation. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2023 Jul;43(4):278-290. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12817. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
- Stratton MT, Smith RW, Harty PS, Rodriguez C, Johnson BA, Dellinger JR, Williams AD, White SJ, Benavides ML, Tinsley GM. Longitudinal agreement of four bioimpedance analyzers for detecting changes in raw bioimpedance during purposeful weight gain with resistance training. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;75(7):1060-1068. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00811-3. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
- Whittaker LG, McNamara EA, Vath S, Shaw E, Malabanan AO, Parker RA, Rosen HN. Direct Comparison of the Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model With the Old Discovery Model. J Clin Densitom. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):524-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Sutter T, Duboeuf F, Chapurlat R, Cortet B, Lespessailles E, Roux JP. DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies. Bone. 2021 Jan;142:115683. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115683. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
- Hopker J, Myers S, Jobson SA, Bruce W, Passfield L. Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer. Int J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;31(10):731-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1261968. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
- Ren C, Zhu J, Shen T, Song Y, Tao L, Xu S, Zhao W, Gao W. Comparison Between Treadmill and Bicycle Ergometer Exercises in Terms of Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 20;9:864637. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864637. eCollection 2022.
- Dong X, Wang X, Jia N, Chen X, Ding M. A comparison between Qigong exercise and cycle ergometer exercise for the rehabilitation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial (CONSORT). Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26010. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026010.
- Driss T, Vandewalle H. The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:589361. doi: 10.1155/2013/589361. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
- Robles-Gonzalez L, Gutierrez-Hellin J, Aguilar-Navarro M, Ruiz-Moreno C, Munoz A, Del-Coso J, R Ruiz J, Amaro-Gahete FJ. Inter-Day Reliability of Resting Metabolic Rate and Maximal Fat Oxidation during Exercise in Healthy Men Using the Ergostik Gas Analyzer. Nutrients. 2021 Nov 29;13(12):4308. doi: 10.3390/nu13124308.
- Haugen HA, Chan LN, Li F. Indirect calorimetry: a practical guide for clinicians. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;22(4):377-88. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022004377.
- Cespedes Feliciano EM, Chen WY, Lee V, Albers KB, Prado CM, Alexeeff S, Xiao J, Shachar SS, Caan BJ. Body Composition, Adherence to Anthracycline and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy, and Survival After Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):264-270. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4668.
- Yang WH, Park JH, Park SY, Park Y. Energetic Contributions Including Gender Differences and Metabolic Flexibility in the General Population and Athletes. Metabolites. 2022 Oct 12;12(10):965. doi: 10.3390/metabo12100965.
- Koelwyn GJ, Zhuang X, Tammela T, Schietinger A, Jones LW. Exercise and immunometabolic regulation in cancer. Nat Metab. 2020 Sep;2(9):849-857. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00277-4. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
- De Bock K, Richter EA, Russell AP, Eijnde BO, Derave W, Ramaekers M, Koninckx E, Leger B, Verhaeghe J, Hespel P. Exercise in the fasted state facilitates fibre type-specific intramyocellular lipid breakdown and stimulates glycogen resynthesis in humans. J Physiol. 2005 Apr 15;564(Pt 2):649-60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.083170. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
- San-Millan I, Brooks GA. Assessment of Metabolic Flexibility by Means of Measuring Blood Lactate, Fat, and Carbohydrate Oxidation Responses to Exercise in Professional Endurance Athletes and Less-Fit Individuals. Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):467-479. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0751-x.
- San-Millan I. The Key Role of Mitochondrial Function in Health and Disease. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;12(4):782. doi: 10.3390/antiox12040782.
- Hofmann P. Cancer and Exercise: Warburg Hypothesis, Tumour Metabolism and High-Intensity Anaerobic Exercise. Sports (Basel). 2018 Jan 31;6(1):10. doi: 10.3390/sports6010010.
- Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Kim JS, Newton RU, Lucia A. Can exercise increase natural killer cell infiltration of the prostate? BJU Int. 2023 Jan;131(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/bju.15904. No abstract available.
- Villasenor A, Ballard-Barbash R, Baumgartner K, Baumgartner R, Bernstein L, McTiernan A, Neuhouser ML. Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL Study. J Cancer Surviv. 2012 Dec;6(4):398-406. doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0234-x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
- Orange ST, Leslie J, Ross M, Mann DA, Wackerhage H. The exercise IL-6 enigma in cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Nov;34(11):749-763. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
- Fiuza-Luces C, Valenzuela PL, Galvez BG, Ramirez M, Lopez-Soto A, Simpson RJ, Lucia A. Author Correction: The effect of physical exercise on anticancer immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024 Mar;24(3):229. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-00999-6. No abstract available.
- 1. Ventura. SEOM: Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica - SEOM: Sociedad Espa [Internet]. Seom.org. [citado el 16 de abril de 2025]. Disponible en: https://www.seom.org/
- Chen N, He X, Zhao G, Lu L, Ainsworth BE, Liu Y, Wu X. Efficacy of low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction vs. high-load resistance training on sarcopenia among community-dwelling older Chinese people: study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Aug 4;22(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05495-z.
- Buchheit M, Ufland P. Effect of endurance training on performance and muscle reoxygenation rate during repeated-sprint running. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Feb;111(2):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1654-9. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
- Jones B, Cooper CE. Use of NIRS to assess effect of training on peripheral muscle oxygenation changes in elite rugby players performing repeated supramaximal cycling tests. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;812:333-339. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_44.
- Jones B, Hamilton DK, Cooper CE. Muscle oxygen changes following Sprint Interval Cycling training in elite field hockey players. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0120338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120338. eCollection 2015.
- Short T, Teranishi-Hashimoto C, Yamada P. Exercise-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Program Improves Phase Angle in Breast Cancer Survivors. Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Nov 1;15(3):1444-1456. doi: 10.70252/OOAQ4294. eCollection 2022.
- Sivagnanam R, Krishnan R, Ramamoorthy J, Karthikeyan S, Sankaranarayanan S, Kumar G, Janet A, Sudhakar S, Govindaraj MK, Kirthika S V. Effect of Bicycle Ergometer Training and Nordic Walking Training on Improving Functional Exercise Capacity in Asthma Patients. Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49762. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49762. eCollection 2023 Nov.
- Liu Y, Ye W, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Kuo CH, Korivi M. Resistance Exercise Intensity is Correlated with Attenuation of HbA1c and Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 7;16(1):140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010140.
- Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Aug 5;11(9):607-15. doi: 10.1038/nri3041.
- Moller AB, Lonbro S, Farup J, Voss TS, Rittig N, Wang J, Hojris I, Mikkelsen UR, Jessen N. Molecular and cellular adaptations to exercise training in skeletal muscle from cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun;145(6):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02911-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
- Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, Rakobowchuk M, Macdonald MJ, McGee SL, Gibala MJ. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol. 2008 Jan 1;586(1):151-60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
- Padilha CS, Marinello PC, Galvao DA, Newton RU, Borges FH, Frajacomo F, Deminice R. Evaluation of resistance training to improve muscular strength and body composition in cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Jun;11(3):339-349. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0592-x. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
- Hernandez-Lepe MA, Hernandez-Ontiveros DA, Chavez-Guevara IA, Ramos-Jimenez A, Hernandez-Torres RP, Lopez-Fregoso RJ, Ramos-Lopez O, Amaro-Gahete FJ, Muniz-Salazar R, Olivas-Aguirre FJ. Impact of Exercise Training at Maximal Fat Oxidation Intensity on Metabolic and Epigenetic Parameters in Patients with Overweight and Obesity: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Oct 31;9(4):214. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040214.
- Nemkov T, Cendali F, Stefanoni D, Martinez JL, Hansen KC, San-Millan I, D'Alessandro A. Metabolic Signatures of Performance in Elite World Tour Professional Male Cyclists. Sports Med. 2023 Aug;53(8):1651-1665. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01846-9. Epub 2023 May 6.
- Metsios GS, Moe RH, Kitas GD. Exercise and inflammation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;34(2):101504. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101504. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
- Hojman P. Exercise protects from cancer through regulation of immune function and inflammation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2017 Aug 15;45(4):905-11. doi: 10.1042/BST20160466. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
- Mallard J, Hucteau E, Charles AL, Bender L, Baeza C, Pelissie M, Trensz P, Pflumio C, Kalish-Weindling M, Geny B, Schott R, Favret F, Pivot X, Hureau TJ, Pagano AF. Chemotherapy impairs skeletal muscle mitochondrial homeostasis in early breast cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Jun;13(3):1896-1907. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12991. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
- Guigni BA, Callahan DM, Tourville TW, Miller MS, Fiske B, Voigt T, Korwin-Mihavics B, Anathy V, Dittus K, Toth MJ. Skeletal muscle atrophy and dysfunction in breast cancer patients: role for chemotherapy-derived oxidant stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2018 Nov 1;315(5):C744-C756. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00002.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Dos Santos WDN, Gentil P, de Moraes RF, Ferreira Junior JB, Campos MH, de Lira CAB, Freitas Junior R, Bottaro M, Vieira CA. Chronic Effects of Resistance Training in Breast Cancer Survivors. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8367803. doi: 10.1155/2017/8367803. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Skin Diseases
- Breast Diseases
- Breast Neoplasms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
- Motor Activity
- Movement
- Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena
- Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena
- Therapeutics
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Patient Care
- Exercise Therapy
- Rehabilitation
- Aftercare
- Continuity of Patient Care
- Physical Conditioning, Human
- Exercise
- Resistance Training
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-712
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
-
CytoDyn, Inc.WEP ClinicalAvailableTNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer | TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | TNBCUnited States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterSummit TherapeuticsRecruitingTNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | TNBC | Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Hu HaiZhejiang Cancer HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Yuan YuanOsel, Inc.; Miyarisan Pharmaceuticals, Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingTNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | TNBC | Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Swiss Cancer InstituteRecruitingTriple-negative Breast Cancer | TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast CancerSwitzerland
-
Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteRecruiting
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingTNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer
-
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho,...RecruitingTriple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)Portugal
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityWest China Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRecruitingTriple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)China
-
Biotheus Inc.RecruitingTriple Negative Breast Cancer(TNBC)China
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular training at maximal fat oxidation (FATmax)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionCompleted