A Non-Interventional PMCF Study Evaluating Croma Revitalis for the Correction of Fine Lines (RICHER)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Croma-Pharma GmbH

A Non-Interventional, Post-Market-Clinical-Follow up (PMCF), Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Center Observational Study Evaluating Croma Revitalis in Correction of Fine Lines

This study will serve to collect and analyze additional data on the use of the device croma revitalis for treatment of fine lines on the face including LCL and PR in the routine practice and as "real-world" performance.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This study is designed to observe the effects of croma revitalis, a medical device used to improve fine lines and skin quality, under real-life conditions. It is a prospective, open-label, non-comparative study, meaning all participants will receive the treatment, and both doctors and participants know what is being administered. This setup allows for efficient collection of clinical data while reflecting typical use in aesthetic practice. The study aims to evaluate improvements in skin concerns such as loss of volume, moisture, tone, and elasticity. The main way effectiveness will be measured is through the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). This is a widely accepted 5-point scale used by doctors to assess visible improvements after treatment. The focus will be on improvements in areas such as lateral canthal lines (LCL), commonly known as "crow's feet", and perioral rhytides (PR), often referred to as "smile lines" or "smoker's lines." The primary evaluation point is Week 8, which is a typical follow-up period after a full treatment cycle consisting of three applications of the product. Participants will continue to be monitored until Week 24. The study plans to enroll approximately 70 participants, with the goal of collecting complete Week 8 data from at least 55 individuals.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1010
        • Recruiting
        • YUVELL
        • Contact:
          • Leo Richter

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults seeking aesthetic treatment for fine lines, such as crow's feet and smile lines. Participants will be generally healthy and representative of typical dermal filler users in routine clinical practice.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants deemed by the treating physician to have LCL and/or PR of sufficient severity to merit treatment with croma revitalis to be corrected and treatment decision is reached independent of this study.
  • Male or female, 18 years of age or older at Visit 1 (Day 0).
  • Healthy skin in the facial area and free of diseases that could interfere in cutaneous aging evaluation, based on the physician's judgment.
  • Participants who, according to routine clinical advice, are willing to refrain from undergoing any aesthetic or surgical procedures in the treatment area during the observation period.
  • Participants who understand the purpose and nature of the observational data documentation and willingness to participate in the routine follow-up after 3, 5, 8, 12, and 24 weeks as judged by the treating physician.
  • Written signed and dated informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who tend to develop hypertrophic scars, have pigment disorders, or have susceptibility to keloid formation.
  • Participants with a history of autoimmune disease or who are receiving therapy for modification of immune response, e.g., biologics, systemic corticosteroids, cytostatic drugs (from Visit 1 [Day 0] until the end of the study).
  • Participants who are known to be hypersensitive to components of the device as HA, glycerol, or gram-positive bacterial proteins.
  • Participants who are pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Participants who are anticoagulated or with history of bleeding disorder.
  • Participants receiving daily treatment with platelet aggregation inhibitors (e.g., acetylsalicylic acid) unless previously cleared by their primary care physician.
  • Participants who have cutaneous, inflammatory, and/or infectious processes (e.g., acne, herpes) present at Visit 1 (Day 0), recurrent herpes simplex or (pre) cancerous lesions in the areas to be treated.
  • Previous permanent implant or treatment with non-HA or non-collagen filler or non-absorbable sutures in the treatment area(s) any time prior to or planned during the observation period.
  • Participants who have received dermabrasion, mesotherapy, chemical peeling, or micro-needling within 3 months prior first treatment and planned during the observation period.
  • Participant has received any of the following (aesthetic) treatments in the treatment area within the last 12 months prior to the first routine treatment or planned during the observation period:

    1. Energy based device treatments that target collagen remodeling and/or production of collagen (e.g. laser therapy).
    2. Absorbable sutures (threads).
    3. HA or collagen dermal fillers.
    4. Botulinum toxin treatment.
    5. Facial lipolysis, including submental fat treatments.
    6. Facial plastic surgery.
    7. Bariatric surgery.
  • Participants with uncontrolled (or unstable) systemic diseases as per the treating physician's discretion.
  • Prior surgery, scars, or tattoos in the treatment area(s), that could interfere with clinical evaluation. Participants planning such procedures during the observation period will not be included.
  • Beard, or facial hair that could interfere in evaluation of treatment as judged by the physician.
  • Participants who have had or are planning to undergo bariatric surgery or facial plastic surgery in the area to be treated within less than 12 months before the first treatment in and planned during the observation period.
  • Planned dental/oral surgery or modification (bridge-work, implants) within 4 weeks before the first treatment in and planned during the observation period.
  • Current participation in another clinical study, or treatment with any investigational drug/MD/device within 30 days prior to the first treatment.
  • Any medical condition or treatment potentially interfering with the clinical evaluation, according to the judgment of the treating physician.
  • Participants whose participation in clinical trials is prohibited by the Austrian Medical Devices Act (MPG) (e.g., persons with a legal custodian appointed due to mental disability, prisoners, soldiers, and other members of the armed forces, civil servants).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder status at Week 8 after initial treatment.
Time Frame: 8 weeks after initial treatment
Visible aesthetic changes at Week 8 after initial treatment in the treated fine lines of at least one treatment area (LCL and/or PR), compared to baseline, as assessed by the physician using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse), where lower scores indicate greater aesthetic improvement.
8 weeks after initial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Status Based on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) - Physician Assessment
Time Frame: Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment

Visible aesthetic changes at Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment compared to baseline, as assessed by the physician using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).

The GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse), where lower scores indicate greater aesthetic improvement. Responders are defined as participants with a GAIS score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).

Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment
Responder Status Based on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) - Independent Evaluator Panel
Time Frame: Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment

Visible aesthetic changes at Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment compared to baseline, as assessed by an independent evaluating panel using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).

The GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse), where lower scores indicate greater aesthetic improvement. Responders are defined as participants with a GAIS score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).

Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24 after initial treatment
Change in Skin Hydration from Baseline Measured by Corneometer
Time Frame: Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24
Change in skin hydration compared to baseline measured using a Corneometer device, which quantifies skin hydration on the treated area(s). Higher values indicate greater skin hydration.
Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24
Change in Skin Tone from Baseline Measured by Cutometer
Time Frame: Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24
Change in skin tone compared to baseline measured on the treated area(s) using the Cutometer device.
Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24
Change in Skin Elasticity from Baseline Measured by Cutometer
Time Frame: Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24

Change in skin elasticity compared to baseline measured using a Cutometer device, which assesses the mechanical properties of the skin through suction-based deformation parameters.

Higher values indicate improved skin elasticity.

Week 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24
Participant Satisfaction with Treatment
Time Frame: Week 8, 12, and 24
Participant-reported satisfaction with treatment at each specified visit using a 5-point scale: "Very unsatisfied," "Unsatisfied," "Neither unsatisfied nor satisfied," "Satisfied," or "Very satisfied."
Week 8, 12, and 24
Aesthetic change based on the physician's live assessment
Time Frame: Week 8, 12 an 24
A live-assessment of the treated areas will be performed and the treated areas will be compared to the participant's photographs obtained at the baseline visit. The presence of the aesthetic change will be recorded as either "Yes" or "No".
Week 8, 12 an 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioral Rhytids

Subscribe