LEXURE for Post-Stroke Aphasia

May 12, 2026 updated by: Nunaps Inc

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LEXURE for Improving Language Function in Patients With Post-Stroke Aphasia

This study evaluates the efficacy of digital language rehabilitation using LEXURE for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. Half of participants will receive structured language training using the LEXURE application, while the other half will receive workbook-based language training as an active comparator.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded confirmatory clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEXURE, a digital therapeutic for language in patients with post-stroke aphasia.

Eligible participants who provide informed consent will undergo screening and be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the LEXURE group or the control group.

LEXURE Group:

Participants assigned to the LEXURE group will receive structured digital language training using the LEXURE application. The training consists of multiple language tasks and will be performed for approximately 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week, for 10 weeks.

Control Group:

Participants assigned to the control group will perform structured language training using a workbook-based intervention. The training will consist of predefined language tasks and will be conducted for approximately 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week, for 10 weeks.

The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed using the K-WAB/PK-WAB-R, and evaluations will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Busan, South Korea, 47392
        • Recruiting
        • Inje University Busan Paik Hospita
        • Contact:
          • Eung-Gyu Kim, MD, PhD
      • Chuncheon, South Korea, 24253
        • Recruiting
        • Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Chulho Kim, MD, PhD
      • Daegu, South Korea, 42601
        • Recruiting
        • Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Sung Il Sohn, MD, PhD
      • Daegu, South Korea, 42415
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Yeungnam University Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Jun Lee, MD, PhD
      • Daegu, South Korea, 41944
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Kyungpook National University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Yangha Hwang, MD, PhD
      • Gwangju, South Korea, 61469
        • Recruiting
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Man Seok Park, MD, PhD
      • Ilsan, South Korea, 10380
        • Recruiting
        • Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Keun-Sik Hong, MD, PhD
      • Jeonju, South Korea, 54907
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Jeonbuk National University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hyun Goo Kang, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, South Korea, 05505
        • Recruiting
        • Asan Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Jun Young Chang, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Recruiting
        • Konkuk University Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Hahn Young Kim, MD, PhD
      • Ulsan, South Korea, 44033
        • Recruiting
        • Ulsan University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jee-Hyun Kwon, MD, PhD
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, 15355
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Korea University Ansan Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jin-Man Jung, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke
  2. At least 3 months have elapsed since stroke onset
  3. History of aphasia resulting from stroke
  4. Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score between 26 and 90 (inclusive) on the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R)
  5. Adults aged 19 years or older
  6. Native Korean speakers
  7. Able to use the investigational device or perform workbook-based training without difficulty
  8. Willing to participate voluntarily and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with language impairment due to causes other than stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, or neurodegenerative disease)
  2. History of language impairment due to developmental disorders
  3. Currently receiving speech-language therapy or participating in another clinical trial related to language function
  4. Currently receiving medication for severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, alcohol dependence, or substance abuse)
  5. Illiterate individuals
  6. Individuals deemed unsuitable for participation in this study by the investigator
  7. Severe cognitive impairment that would interfere with understanding or performing the study interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LEXURE
Participants assigned to this arm will receive language training intervention using the LEXURE digital therapeutic (DTx) software.
Participants will undergo a total of 50 training sessions, conducted 5 times per week for 10 weeks. Each session consists of five training tasks and takes approximately 30 minutes to complete..
Active Comparator: Workbook
Participants assigned to this arm will receive a language therapy workbook and perform structured language exercises as a control intervention.
Participants will perform language training using a workbook. Training will be conducted 5 times per week for 10 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Change in Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score from baseline to Week 10, measured using the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). AQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better language function. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Spontaneous Speech Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Change from baseline to Week 10 in Spontaneous Speech score measured using the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). Higher scores indicate better expressive language ability. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10
Change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Auditory Comprehension Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Change from baseline to Week 10 in Auditory Comprehension score measured using the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). Higher scores indicate better language comprehension ability. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10
Change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Repetition Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Change from baseline to Week 10 in Repetition score measured using the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). Higher scores indicate better verbal repetition ability. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10
Change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Naming and Word Finding Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Change from baseline to Week 10 in Naming and Word Finding score measured using the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). Higher scores indicate better lexical retrieval ability. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10
Mean change in K-WAB or PK-WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) in the study group
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Mean change from baseline to Week 10 in Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB) or the Paradise Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R) Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score in the study group. The AQ score reflects overall language function. Higher scores indicate better overall language function. Assessments will be conducted by an independent, evaluator-blinded assessor.
Baseline to Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sung Il Sohn, MD, PhD, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Apraxia of Speech | PPA | Non-fluent Aphasia | Primary Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia
    United States
Subscribe