- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07587333
Convective Radio-frequency Water Vapor Energy Verses Trans-urethral Enucleation of Prostate for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
May 15, 2026 updated by: Hany Fathy Badawy, MD, Beni-Suef University
Prospective Study Comparing Convective Radio-frequency Water Vapor Energy With Trans-urethral Enucleation of Prostate for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Convective RF water vapor energy was introduced as a minimally invasive, radio-frequency thermal energy-based treatment, designed to convectively deliver sterile water vapor, or steam for targeted ablation limited to the transition and central zones in men with clinical BPH.
Thus. the aim of the study is to compare Convective RF water vapor energy (Rezum) with trans-urethral enucleation of the prostate (TUEP) regarding efficacy in terms of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) improvement, international prostatic symptoms score (IPSS), improving of the maximum flow rate (Qmax), worsening of erectile and ejaculatory function, and safety regarding post operative complications & hospital stay.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
- Faculty of medicine Beni Suef University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male aged > 50 yrs.
- International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >12
- Maximum flow rate ( Qmax ) < 15 ml/s for 125ml voided volume
- Post-void residual volume <350 ml
- Prostate volume 80-120 g
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active urinary tract infection at time of treatment.
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) more than 10 ng/l.
- history of prostate or bladder cancer.
- Anticoagulants within 3d of the index procedure
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Convective RF water vapor energy (Rezum)
|
Convective RF water vapor energy (Rezum)
|
|
Active Comparator: Transurethral enucleation of prostate (TUEP)
|
transurethral enucleation of prostate (TUEP)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
|
The total score ranges from 0 to 35, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 35 indicates the most severe symptoms.
Higher scores represent worse urinary symptoms and poorer clinical status.
|
1, 6, 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
|
The erectile function domain score ranges from 1 to 30, where lower scores indicate more severe erectile dysfunction and higher scores indicate better erectile function.
Higher scores represent better clinical outcomes.
|
1, 6, 12 months
|
|
four-item version of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD Short Form)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
|
The total score ranges from 1 to 15 for the ejaculatory function domain, with higher scores indicating better ejaculatory function.
In the bother item, scores range from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate greater bother or distress related to ejaculatory dysfunction.
|
1, 6, 12 months
|
|
Qmax maximum urinary flow rate
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
|
Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) will be assessed using uroflowmetry, a non-invasive urodynamic test that measures the maximum flow rate of urine during voiding.
Qmax is reported in milliliters per second (mL/s).
Higher values indicate better urinary flow and improved urinary function.
|
1, 6, 12 months
|
|
Post Void Residual volume (PVR)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months
|
Post-Void Residual urine volume (PVR) will be assessed using bladder ultrasound immediately after voiding to determine the amount of urine remaining in the bladder.
PVR is reported in milliliters (mL).
Higher values indicate worse bladder emptying and poorer urinary function.
|
1, 6, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 8, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
May 14, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 19, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 15, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FMBSUREC/04062024/ Mohamed
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
-
inTumo Therapeutics, Inc.RecruitingBPH | BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) | BPH With Other Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
ALPFA MedicalNot yet recruiting
-
Qing YuanRecruiting
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRecruiting
-
Ankara UniversityNot yet recruitingBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
-
University of ChicagoNot yet recruiting
-
General Hospital Sveti DuhNot yet recruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
-
Resurge Therapeutics Inc.Active, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on Rezum
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Hisar Intercontinental HospitalCompletedProstatic HyperplasiaTurkey
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingProstatic Hyperplasia of the Medial LobeKorea, Republic of
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...Not yet recruitingBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaChina
-
Can-Am HIFU Inc.Recruiting
-
NeoTract, Inc.Active, not recruitingBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaUnited Kingdom, United States
-
khaled Abdelsattar Gad IbrahimCompleted