- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06818383
Comparative Study Between Rezum Therapy in Small and Large Prostates
February 8, 2025 updated by: khaled Abdelsattar Gad Ibrahim
Four-year Follow-up in Rezum Therapy of Small Prostates in Comparison with Large Prostates. a Prospective Trial
The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Rezūm therapy for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in small and large prostates.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
For decades, Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the gold standard surgical intervention for small and moderate prostates, however it has high morbidity and prolonged hospital stay Rezūm is a radiofrequency made water vapour thermal treatment.
It has recently been added to the international guidelines as a choice for medical treatment resistant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
The AUA and Canadian Urological Association (CUA) guidelines now add water vapour therapy as a treatment option for BPH patients with small prostate size <80 gm and for those wishing to maintain antegrade ejaculation.
While investigators still offer no clear recommendation to Rezūm use for those with large prostates.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
178
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Nozha
-
Cairo, Nozha, Egypt, 4470351
- The Armed Forces College of Medicine (AFCM)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- prostate size 45-75 gm
- sexually active
- mod - sever LUTS
- Q max < 15
- IPSS > 15
- failed medical treatment with alpha blockers
Exclusion Criteria:
- neurogenic bladder
- urethral stricture
- UB stones
- cancer prostate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: BPH patients have small prostates treated with Rezum
Patients aged 45-75 years with prostate volumes of 50-80 ml, sexually active, and have severe LUTS treated with Rezum procedure
|
minimal invasive technique for treating BPH
|
|
Active Comparator: BPH patients have large prostates treated with Rezum
Patients aged 45-75 years with prostate volumes of 80-120 ml, sexually active, and have severe LUTS treated with Rezum procedure
|
minimal invasive technique for treating BPH
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
|
Measurement of The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed.
Qmax is measured by (ml/sec) Normal values are described as a Qmax above 15 ml/sec and below 10 ml/sec is considered abnormal
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
|
|
The Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoLat 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
|
Measurement of The Quality of Life (QoL) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed.
Minimum :0 means delighted / Maximum : 5 means unhappy
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoLat 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
|
|
The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator measures PSA at 3, 12, and 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
Concentration of The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) in both groups after 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed.
PSA is measured by ng/ml PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ mL and lower were considered
|
for each case in both groups the investigator measures PSA at 3, 12, and 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
Measurement of The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed.
Minimum :0 / Maximum : 35 Total score: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess IIEF at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
Measurement of The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed.
The IIEF-5 score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 5 items.
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess IIEF at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
The Prostate size
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
the prostate size was measured by grams by Trans-rectal ultra sound
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
The operative time
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess the time of operation from induction of anaesthesia till the end of the operation through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
the operative time was measured by minutes in both groups.
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the time of operation from induction of anaesthesia till the end of the operation through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
Incidence of The catheter duration post operative
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess the catheter duration from the end of the operation till removal through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
The catheter duration was measured by days in both groups
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the catheter duration from the end of the operation till removal through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
Post operative hospital stay time
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess the hospital time from the day of admission of the patient in hospital to do intervention till discharge from hospital through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
the Post operative hospital stay time was measured by hours in both groups.
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the hospital time from the day of admission of the patient in hospital to do intervention till discharge from hospital through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
|
Post operative residual urine (PVR)
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
PVR was measured by ml by pelvi abdominal ultra sound in both groups.
Normal ranges are below 150 ml of urine.
|
for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: through four years
|
For each case in both groups the investigator assess the safety using incidence of complications by The Clavien-Dindo system
|
through four years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Mohamed Samir Salem, MD
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- McVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG. Rezum Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results From Randomized Controlled Study. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
- Dixon CM, Cedano ER, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Larson TR, Mynderse LA. Two-year results after convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Res Rep Urol. 2016 Nov 21;8:207-216. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S119596. eCollection 2016.
- Bole R, Gopalakrishna A, Kuang R, Alamiri J, Yang DY, Helo S, Ziegelmann MJ, Kohler TS. Comparative Postoperative Outcomes of Rezum Prostate Ablation in Patients with Large Versus Small Glands. J Endourol. 2020 Jul;34(7):778-781. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0177. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 7, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 8, 2025
Last Verified
February 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Rezum therapy in prostate
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Hyperplasia
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedBPH( Benign Prostate Hyperplasia) | TURP(Transurethral Resection of Prostate)Korea, Republic of
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Completed
-
Uppsala UniversityHelsingborgs Hospital; Sormland County Council, Sweden; Centrallasarettet Västerås and other collaboratorsRecruitingProstate Hyperplasia | Embolization, Therapeutic | Transurethral Resection of Prostate SyndromeSweden
-
St. Luke's Medical Center, PhilippinesCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostate Cancer | ProstatitisPhilippines
-
Muharrem BaturuCompletedProstate Hyperplasia | Thulium Fiber Laser | Laser Prostate EnucleationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ziv HospitalNot yet recruitingInflammation | Prostate Neoplasm | Benign Hyperplasia of Prostate
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
Clinique Saint-HilaireCompletedProstate HyperplasiaFrance
-
Adana City Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Rezum therapy
-
Northwell HealthBoston Scientific CorporationSuspendedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaUnited States
-
Saint Vincent's Hospital, KoreaRecruiting
-
ALI KAMAL M. SAMICompleted
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Hisar Intercontinental HospitalCompletedProstatic HyperplasiaTurkey
-
Helwan UniversityCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Lower Urinary Track SymptomsEgypt
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingProstatic Hyperplasia of the Medial LobeKorea, Republic of
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...Not yet recruitingBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaChina