AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study (AI-REMAP)

June 17, 2026 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients

What is the purpose of this study? This study aims to evaluate the usability and feasibility of an artificial intelligence-based model designed to monitor in real-time the engagement and motor performance of pediatric patients during technology-assisted rehabilitation.

Who can take part? 15 participants between 5 and 17 years old with neuromotor impairments will take part, along with at least 5 of their referring physiotherapists.

What will happen in the study? Each pediatric patient will take part in a single, 1-hour rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system, according to their standard clinical prescription. During the session, the physiotherapist will have access to a display showing real-time data from the AI model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement level, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will complete a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and provide direct feedback on how to improve the model.

Why is this study important? Assessing the usability of this real-time monitoring tool is a necessary step to understand if it is practical for clinical use. Providing therapists with objective, real-time insights into a child's psychological and physical state can ultimately help tailor therapy to the specific needs of each patient, improving the overall rehabilitation experience.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged between 5 and 17 years with neuromotor impairments who are undergoing rehabilitation therapy using the Lokomat and GRAIL devices, according to the existing clinical plan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncooperative subjects.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Real-Time Engagement Monitoring
Participants in this experimental arm, consisting of pediatric patients with neuromotor impairments, will undergo a single 1-hour technology-assisted rehabilitation session using either the Lokomat or GRAIL system. During the session, the physiotherapist will use a display showing real-time outputs from the AI-based model, including the patient's heart rate, engagement levels, pleasantness, activation, and motor performance. The model acts as an observational support tool and will not directly alter the standard rehabilitation protocol. At the end of the session, the physiotherapist will evaluate the usability of the system.
The intervention consists of the deployment of a real-time AI-based monitoring system during a standard technology-assisted rehabilitation session. The physiotherapist is provided with a display showing continuous feedback on the patient's engagement levels, emotional state (pleasantness and activation), motor performance, and heart rate. The model processes physiological and inertial data collected via wearable sensors, acting purely as an observational support tool without altering the standard rehabilitation protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
This validated questionnaire is intended to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a system or product. It is composed of 10 items assessing factors such as system complexity, ease of use, and functionality integration. Each item is proposed on a 5-points Likert scale, with minimum value 1 and maximum value 5. Higher overall values stand for a higher degree of agreement with respect to the statement provided by the single item. For odd items, higher values stand for higher usability. For even items, higher values stand for lower usability.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Service Provider-Rated Measure of Client Engagement (PRIME-SP)
Time Frame: Baseline
This measure is intended to capture the therapist's observation of patient engagement. PRIME-SP is a validated self-reported questionnaire that is composed of three main parts: Part A, where the therapist can perform an overall evaluation of patient engagement according to a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4, with higher values corresponding to positive engagement); Part B, where the therapist can perform a domain-dependent (affective, cognitive, behavioral domains) evaluation of patient engagement according to a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4, with higher values corresponding to positive engagement); Part C, where the therapist can take free notes about factors and circumstances that he/she believes may have affected patient engagement in the session.
Baseline
AI Model-Inferred Engagement Level
Time Frame: Baseline
This objective measure is intended to capture the patient's continuous engagement level during the rehabilitation session. The AI-based model infers the engagement state using feed-forward neural networks that process real-time physiological data (such as HRV and EDA) and inertial signals (IMU). The model provides a categorical evaluation of engagement (low vs high).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • L2-246-F2
  • RC 2024-2026 to E. Biffi (Other Grant/Funding Number: Italian Ministry of Health)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The results obtained at the end of this clinical trial will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed international journals. The raw data of the study will be published among the supplementary materials of scientific articles and/or uploaded to Zenodo, a multidisciplinary repository, managed by CERN in Geneva, which allows researchers to share and preserve research results in any size and form. Depositing data in ZENODO guarantees their compliance with the FAIR principles.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromotor Impairments

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence Model for Rehabilitation Engagement Monitoring

3
Subscribe