PROV-MESH: Prophylactic Ovarian Cancer MESH (PROV-MESH)

June 24, 2026 updated by: Jose Luis Sanchez, Hospital Vall d'Hebron

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Prophylactic Mesh Placement Versus Primary Closure, With or Without Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, in Patients Undergoing Primary or Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

Incisional hernia is a common complication after midline laparotomy and may significantly impact quality of life, morbidity, and healthcare costs. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer are considered at increased risk due to extensive surgical procedures, nutritional status, and exposure to systemic treatments.

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate whether prophylactic mesh placement during abdominal wall closure reduces the incidence of incisional hernia compared with conventional fascial closure in women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer through a midline laparotomy. To control for the potential effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on surgical site infection, participants will also be randomized to receive NPWT or standard wound dressing, resulting in four treatment arms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jose Luis Sánchez Iglesias, MD PhD
  • Phone Number: 3217 +34 932746000
  • Email: jlsanig@yahoo.es

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
        • Contact:
          • Jose Luis Sánchez Iglesias, MD PhD
          • Phone Number: 3217 +34 932746000
          • Email: jlsanig@yahoo.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma.
  • Undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery, interval cytoreductive surgery, or delayed cytoreductive surgery after six cycles of chemotherapy.
  • Surgical procedure performed through a midline laparotomy.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer (secondary, tertiary, or subsequent cytoreductions).
  • Minimally invasive surgical approach.
  • Planned secondary cytoreductive surgery during the 24-month follow-up period.
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with follow-up requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prophylactic Mesh + Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Participants will undergo standard fascial closure reinforced with a prophylactic supra-aponeurotic non-absorbable mesh and postoperative negative pressure wound therapy using a PICO dressing for 7 days.
Placement of a non-absorbable polypropylene or polyester mesh in a supra-aponeurotic position at the time of abdominal wall closure following cytoreductive surgery.
Application of a PICO negative pressure dressing after skin closure, maintained for 7 days postoperatively.
Experimental: Prophylactic Mesh without Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Participants will undergo standard fascial closure reinforced with a prophylactic supra-aponeurotic non-absorbable mesh and standard postoperative wound dressing.
Placement of a non-absorbable polypropylene or polyester mesh in a supra-aponeurotic position at the time of abdominal wall closure following cytoreductive surgery.
Active Comparator: Conventional Closure + Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Participants will undergo standard fascial closure without mesh reinforcement and postoperative negative pressure wound therapy using a PICO dressing for 7 days.
Application of a PICO negative pressure dressing after skin closure, maintained for 7 days postoperatively.
Continuous closure of the abdominal fascia using slowly absorbable monofilament suture (PDS 2-0), single-layer closure without peritoneal closure, maintaining a suture-to-wound length ratio greater than 4:1 and employing the small-bites technique.
Experimental: Conventional Closure without Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Participants will undergo standard fascial closure without mesh reinforcement and standard postoperative wound dressing.
Continuous closure of the abdominal fascia using slowly absorbable monofilament suture (PDS 2-0), single-layer closure without peritoneal closure, maintaining a suture-to-wound length ratio greater than 4:1 and employing the small-bites technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Incisional Hernia
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
Presence of an abdominal wall incisional hernia confirmed by computed tomography (CT scan) or by imaging performed after clinical suspicion during follow-up.
24 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Surgical site infection according to CDC criteria.
Within 30 days after surgery
Incidence of Incisional Hernia at Intermediate Time Points
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Radiologically confirmed incisional hernia detected during routine follow-up imaging.
3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Risk Factors Associated With Incisional Hernia Development
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Identification of demographic, clinical, oncological, and surgical variables associated with incisional hernia occurrence.
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Prophylactic Mesh Placement

3
Subscribe