NoPro - Norwegian Hernia Prophylaxis Study (NoPro)

February 28, 2025 updated by: Sykehuset Innlandet HF

NoPro - Norwegian Hernia Prophylaxis Study: Onlay Mesh Versus Small Bite Suture Technique Closure of Midline Laparotomies

A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing midline laparotomy closures using the small-bite suture technique alone to those using the small-bite suture technique with an additional onlay prophylactic polypropylene mesh. The primary endpoint is the incidence of incisional hernias in both groups after one year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An incisional hernia (IH) is a defect in the abdominal wall at the site of a surgical scar, leading to the protrusion of abdominal contents through the defect. It is a common complication following midline laparotomy, with incidence rates ranging from 9% to 40% in the general population, and up to 69% in high-risk patients. Several studies have been conducted on the prevention of IH, and one established intervention is the use of a synthetic mesh to reinforce the suture closure of the abdomen after midline laparotomy. However, the use of mesh in this context is not widespread in Norway, and there are no Norwegian studies on IH prevention following midline laparotomy. This study aims to contribute to the broader knowledge base and encourage Norwegian surgeons to consider using prophylactic meshes.

The study will involve three Norwegian hospitals: Hamar Hospital, Gjøvik Hospital, and Lillehammer Hospital. Participants will be patients scheduled for midline laparotomy at these hospitals who consent to participate, meet the inclusion criteria, and do not meet any exclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups, each receiving a different variation of fascia closure during laparotomy. One group will undergo closure using the standard small-bites technique only, while the other group will undergo closure with the small-bites technique in addition to an onlay polypropylene mesh.

The primary outcome is the occurrence of incisional hernia one year after surgery, identified through clinical examination and CT scan. Additionally, surgical site occurrences (e.g., hematoma, infection, seroma, wound dehiscence) will be recorded four to six weeks post-surgery. Quality of life and pain levels will also be assessed at both four to six weeks and one year after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery predominantly done my midline laparotomy
  • Age 18 years old or older
  • Written consent by patient/family
  • Midline laparotomy with delayed closure
  • No exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous abdominal midline hernia mesh repair
  • Abdominal compartment syndrome
  • Linea alba closure not possible
  • Life expectancy under six months
  • Hernia in the midline with transverse diameter lager than 2 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mesh group
The patients in the mesh group are closed with small bites technique and in addition receiving an onlay polypropylene mesh when closing the fascia in midline laparotomies. These patients receive a subcutaneous drain to prevent seroma.
The patients in the mesh group are closed with small bites technique and in addition receiving an onlay polypropylene mesh when closing the fascia in midline laparotomies.
No Intervention: Suture group
The patients in the suture group are closed with small bites technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incisional hernia
Time Frame: 12 months
Incisional hernia occurrence will be evaluated clinically and by CT examination after 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks and 1 year
Quality of life will be measured preoperatively for elective patients and after 4-6 weeks and after 1 year for all patients. Quality of life will be measured using 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) provided by the EuroQol group. The system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
4-6 weeks and 1 year
Level of pain
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks and 1 year
Pain level will be measured preoperatively for elective patients and after 4-6 weeks and after 1 year for all patients. The level will be measured using VAS-scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is explained as "no pain" and 10 is explained as "the worst pain you can possibly imagine".
4-6 weeks and 1 year
Symptomatic surgical site occurrence (SSO)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
Symptomatic surgical site occurrence (SSO)when the patient it discharged and after 4-6 weeks. Surgical site occurence including seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence and infection.
4-6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lars Martin Rekkedal, MD BBA, Chief of surgery Hamar Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infections

Clinical Trials on Prophylactic polypropylene onlay mesh

Subscribe