Prevention of Umbilical Port-site Hernia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Prosthetic Mesh Versus Simple Suture

February 28, 2013 updated by: Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, MD, PhD, Hospital General Universitario Elche
The incidence of port-site hernia in patients with risk factors (obesity, elderly, diabetes and lung disorders) can be reduced by the use of a prophylactic mesh in the closure of umbilical port site.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

106

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain, 03203
        • Hospital General Universitario de Elche

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 65 years
  • BMI > 30 Kg/m2
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Lung disease
  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Umbilical hernia
  • Previous laparotomy
  • Conversion to open procedure
  • Loss during the follow up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Suture
Umbilical port-site closure with simple suture of the fascia.
The port-site hole is closed with simple suture of the fascia
Experimental: Prophylactic mesh
Umbilical port-site closure with mesh placement
Placement of a Omega 3 mesh, fixed to the border of the fascia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of port-site hernia
Time Frame: 12 months
Comparison of incidence of port-site hernia between patiensts with and without prophylactic mesh placement
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluation of different pain perception in patients with and without prophylactic mesh placement, determined in the postoperative course and at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Port-site Hernia

Clinical Trials on Fascial suture

Subscribe