- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07682480
Comparison of First Attempt Success Based on Endotracheal Tube Type During Videolaryngoscope-guided Intubation Without Stylet
June 28, 2026 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital
Comparison of First Attempt Success Based on Endotracheal Tube Type During Videolaryngoscope-guided Intubation Without Stylet: Prospective Non-inferiority Comparison
Patients are randomly assigned to either the oral RAE tube group (Group O) or the reinforced tube group (Group R).
In both groups, tracheal intubation is performed using a videolaryngoscope without a stylet, and the first-attempt success rate is compared.
Upon emergence from anesthesia and removal of the endotracheal tube, the degree of subglottic injury is assessed and compared between the groups.
In addition, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness are evaluated and compared at 1 hour and 24 hours after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
246
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: KYUNG WON SHIN
- Phone Number: 02-2072-2469
- Email: skwskw126@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 19 years or older
- Scheduled to undergo surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Inadequate preoperative fasting
- Congenital or acquired upper airway abnormalities (e.g., tumors, polyps, trauma, abscesses, inflammation, foreign bodies)
- History of upper airway surgery
- High risk of aspiration or bleeding tendency
- Presence of severely loose teeth
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: oral RAE tube group
|
Tracheal intubation is performed using a videolaryngoscope without a stylet.
In Group O, an oral RAE tube is used, while in Group R, a reinforced endotracheal tube is used.
Intubation is conducted after induction of general anesthesia.
Upon completion of surgery, the endotracheal tube is removed, and the degree of subglottic injury is assessed.
Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness are evaluated at 1 hour and 24 hours after extubation.
|
|
Active Comparator: reinforced tube group
|
Tracheal intubation is performed using a videolaryngoscope without a stylet.
In Group O, an oral RAE tube is used, while in Group R, a reinforced endotracheal tube is used.
Intubation is conducted after induction of general anesthesia.
Upon completion of surgery, the endotracheal tube is removed, and the degree of subglottic injury is assessed.
Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness are evaluated at 1 hour and 24 hours after extubation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation
Time Frame: Immediately after induction of anesthesia
|
The proportion of patients in whom tracheal intubation is successfully completed on the first attempt using a videolaryngoscope without a stylet, comparing the oral RAE tube group with the reinforced tube group.
|
Immediately after induction of anesthesia
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence and grade of subglottic airway injury
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of surgery (at extubation)
|
Assessed using flexible bronchoscopy at the time of extubation; graded on a 0-3 scale
|
Immediately after completion of surgery (at extubation)
|
|
Postoperative sore throat score
Time Frame: 1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Sore throat severity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at 1 and 24 hours after surgery.
|
1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Incidence of postoperative hoarseness
Time Frame: 1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Binary evaluation (presence or absence) of hoarseness at 1 and 24 hours after surgery.
|
1 hour and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Cormack-Lehane grade and POGO score
Time Frame: Periprocedural (during tracheal intubation)
|
Airway visualisation was assessed during tracheal intubation using the Cormack-Lehane grading system (Grade I-IV, where Grade I indicates full view of the glottis and Grade IV indicates no visible glottic structures; lower grades indicate better glottic visualisation) and the Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score (0-100%, where higher scores indicate better glottic visualisation).
|
Periprocedural (during tracheal intubation)
|
|
Mean blood pressure
Time Frame: Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
|
|
Heart rate
Time Frame: Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
|
|
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
|
|
Bispectral index
Time Frame: Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
Periprocedural (immediately before and immediately after tracheal intubation)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 17, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 17, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 28, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
July 6, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 6, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 28, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2503-040-1621
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation Complication
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
University Hospital HeidelbergRecruitingIntubation | Intubation ComplicationGermany
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Complication | Intubation Intraesophageal | Intubation Depth | Intubation, Nasogastric | Intubation Times
-
University at BuffaloTerminatedIntubation Complication | Intubation;DifficultUnited States
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompleted
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation, DifficultTaiwan
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; DifficultChina
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Hospital General Universitario de ValenciaFIPSERecruitingDifficult Intubation | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
Clinical Trials on endotracheal tube
-
Karaman Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedCuff PressureKorea, Republic of
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteEnrolling by invitationAcute Respiratory FailureUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedCritically Ill | Intubation ComplicationFrance
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedEndotracheal Tube | Cuff PressureKorea, Republic of
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedEndotracheal IntubationIsrael
-
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart HospitalCompletedHeart ArrestKorea, Republic of
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingObesity, Morbid | Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-SalpetriereAssociation pour la Recherche et la Formation en Anesthésie Analgésie RéanimationCompletedPostoperative PneumoniaFrance
-
Medical University of SilesiaCompletedPredictive Value of Tests | Intubation;DifficultPoland