Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation (i-gel_br)

April 13, 2015 updated by: Choi Hyun Young, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study

The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption.

Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Yeongdeungpo-gu
      • Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Korea, Republic of, 150-037
        • KangNam Sacred Heart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • emergency physician
  • work at emergency department more than 1 year.
  • 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having backache or wrist pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intubation using laryngoscope

Intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

  • Conventional endotracheal tube
  • Reinforced endotracheal tube
Device: Conventional endotracheal tube
Conventional endotracheal tube
Device: Reinforced endotracheal tube
Reinforced endotracheal tube
Experimental: i-gel blind intubation

i-gel blind intubation means that blind endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion.

i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

  • Conventional endotracheal tube
  • Reinforced endotracheal tube
Device: Conventional endotracheal tube
Conventional endotracheal tube
Device: Reinforced endotracheal tube
Reinforced endotracheal tube
Experimental: i-gel bronchoscopic intubation

i-gel bronchoscopic intubation means that bronchoscopic endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion.

i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

  • Conventional endotracheal tube
  • Reinforced endotracheal tube
Device: Conventional endotracheal tube
Conventional endotracheal tube
Device: Reinforced endotracheal tube
Reinforced endotracheal tube

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intubation time
Time Frame: 1 Day
1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.
1 Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate for intubation
Time Frame: 1 Day
the rate for successful 1st intubation
1 Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-02-30

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Arrest

Clinical Trials on Conventional endotracheal tube

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe