Evaluating Intervention Allocation Policies for Reducing Hospital Readmissions at Michigan Medicine

July 1, 2026 updated by: Jenna Wiens, University of Michigan
The researchers are investigating if using a risk-based prediction score or benefit-based prediction score to allocate transition of care (TOC) interventions is more effective in reducing the rate of unplanned hospital readmissions or death within 30 days of hospital discharge.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The intervention affects only how the TOC bundle is assigned and does not alter how the telephone calls are delivered. For example, both care navigators and pharmacists receive the same patient information and follow the same call procedures before and after the intervention.

Individuals with predicted benefits greater than the 40% quantile are assigned the phone call bundle while others were not assigned the bundle. During the trial the 40% quantile will be dynamically determined using discharge data from the previous week.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jenna Wiens, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient meets the primary care established rule at Michigan Medicine (MM), AND
  • Patient's primary care physician (PCP) Department is one of our General Medicine or Family Medicine or Medical-Pediatrics departments, AND
  • Inpatient class is Inpatient or Observation or Obs Greater than 48 hours or Outpatient in a Bed or Extended Recovery or Hospital Care at Home Inpatient or Hospital Care at Home Observation, AND
  • Discharged from General Medicine or Family Medicine or Medicine Observation services, AND
  • Disposition of home or home with home care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physician Organization of Michigan Accountable Care Organization (POM ACO)
  • Sepsis patients (had a diagnosis of sepsis during admission, active or resolved on the hospital problem list)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Arm/Standard of care
The Control Arm, in which patients with a LACE Index score of 9 or greater on the day of hospital discharge will receive TOC interventions. This is the currently implemented allocation policy at Michigan Medicine. In this setting, approximately 60% of patients receive the TOC intervention. Thus, we will use a threshold of the 40th percentile for assigning the TOC telephone call bundle. Note that to maintain the 60% intervention rate throughout the study, the score threshold (LACE 9 or greater) will be monitored and dynamically adjusted. The LACE Index has four components: Length of Stay (L), Acuity of the Admission (A), Comorbidities (C), and Emergency Department Visits (E), and estimates the risk of a patient having an unplanned hospital readmission after being discharged from their current encounter.
The LACE Index has four components: Length of Stay (L), Acuity of the Admission (A), Comorbidities (C), and Emergency Department Visits (E), and estimates the risk of a patient having an unplanned hospital readmission after being discharged from their current encounter.
Experimental: Experimental Arm
The Experimental Arm, in which Causal-Hospital reAdmission Risk Prediction Model (C-HARP) scores will be used to allocate TOC interventions. C-HARP is a machine learning model that leverages routinely collected and stored patient data in the electronic health record (EHR) to estimate how much a patient will benefit from receiving MM's TOC telephone call bundle. The assignment threshold will be defined as the 40th percentile of C-HARP scores within the most recent 100 days of the target cohort, so that approximately 60% of patients are assigned the telephone call bundle. Based on current retrospective data, this threshold corresponds to a C-HARP score of 18.
The Experimental Arm will allocate TOC interventions based on scores generated by the Causal-Hospital reAdmission Risk Prediction Model (C-HARP), C-HARP is a linear model that leverages routinely collected and stored patient data in the electronic health record (EHR) to estimate how much a patient will benefit from receiving Michigan Medicine's (MM's) TOC telephone call bundle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of 30-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Time Frame: 30 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
30 calendar days following the index discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of 90-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Time Frame: 90 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
90 calendar days following the index discharge
Time to first 90-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Time Frame: 90 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
90 calendar days following the index discharge
TOC telephone call bundle completion (care navigator call)
Time Frame: 5 calendar days after discharge.

A care navigator call is considered complete if a completed call record is observed within 5 calendar days after discharge.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

5 calendar days after discharge.
TOC telephone call bundle completion (clinical pharmacist call)
Time Frame: 14 calendar days after discharge

A clinical pharmacist call is considered complete if a completed call record is observed within 14 calendar days after discharge.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

14 calendar days after discharge
TOC telephone call bundle completion (both calls)
Time Frame: 14 calendar days after discharge

Completed the care navigator call and completed the clinical pharmacist call.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

14 calendar days after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jenna Wiens, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00282075

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transition of Care

Clinical Trials on The LACE Index TOC assignment

3
Subscribe