Improving Health Care Transition for Youth With Special Needs

October 12, 2017 updated by: Lisa Tuchman

Implementing a Randomized Care Coordination Intervention for Minority Youth With Special Health Care Needs During Health Care Transition From Pediatric to Adult Health Care.

Special opportunities exist in vulnerable populations with chronic conditions to better understand what life course factors can facilitate attainment of optimal health and development. One such opportunity arises in the life of an adolescent or young adult when they transition their care from pediatric to adult health providers and systems, referred to as "health care transition". Experts generally agree that health care transition is often unsuccessful and associated with a variety of adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes of unsuccessful health care transition include foregone or delayed medical care and having no identified adult medical home after leaving pediatrics. This foregone and delayed care can result in potentially preventable costly utilization of hospital emergency and inpatient services. Particularly concerning is increasing evidence that for some youth, transition from pediatric to adult medical care is a high-risk period for mortality. In addition to the adverse effects on individuals, unsuccessful health care transition also likely has economic consequences, particularly given that the majority of health care spending is already allotted to individuals with chronic conditions. These problems are even greater for low income and minority youth, with the District of Columbia having the highest level of unmet transition needs in the U.S.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Special opportunities exist in vulnerable populations with chronic conditions to better understand what life course factors can facilitate attainment of optimal health and development. One such opportunity arises in the life of an adolescent or young adult when they transition their care from pediatric to adult health providers and systems, referred to as "health care transition". Experts generally agree that health care transition is often unsuccessful and associated with a variety of adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes of unsuccessful health care transition include foregone or delayed medical care and having no identified adult medical home after leaving pediatrics. This foregone and delayed care can result in potentially preventable costly utilization of hospital emergency and inpatient services. Particularly concerning is increasing evidence that for some youth, transition from pediatric to adult medical care is a high-risk period for mortality. In addition to the adverse effects on individuals, unsuccessful health care transition also likely has economic consequences, particularly given that the majority of health care spending is already allotted to individuals with chronic conditions. These problems are even greater for low income and minority youth, with the District of Columbia having the highest level of unmet transition needs in the U.S.

In light of these facts, it becomes urgent to implement recommended standards for health care transition and evaluate their impact on transition outcomes. This research quantifies the impact of recommended health care transition practices using a randomized trial design and analysis following the intention-to-treat paradigm. The investigators do so by comparing aspects of 1) health care transition effectiveness (i.e., care coordination, timing, and services received); 2) experience of care (i.e., satisfaction and quality of chronic illness care); and 3) health care utilization in a population of 18-22 year-old African-American adolescents with special health care needs, receiving primary care in an urban academic adolescent medicine practice, using standardized outcome measures. Half of participants received usual care enhanced by written transition information, and half received a health care transition intervention modeled on the joint American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Physicians best practices report, released July 2011 that identified six recommended core components for transition programs. These include both practice based components (i.e. written transition policy, transitioning youth registry, and transfer of care) and patient level components (i.e. transition planning and completion). This report makes available an important standard for establishing transition practices but also demands careful evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

209

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 22 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • African-American, 16-22 years old at enrollment, receiving primary care at Adolescent Health Center, Recipient of Health Services for Children with Special Needs, Inc. insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include individuals who have already been transferred from the adolescent health center to another practice and those with insufficient knowledge of English to participate in the telephone interviews.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention group received all aspects of enhanced usual care but was also assigned a healthcare transition nurse who coordinated the delivery of specific intervention services. These services included 1) a face-to-face systematic review of the readiness assessment with the participant/caregiver 2) a status assessment of ongoing healthcare transition planning and preparation; 3) monthly phone calls with the participant/caregiver to update and fill gaps in the healthcare transition action plan.
These services included 1) a face-to-face systematic review of the readiness assessment with the participant/caregiver 2) a status assessment of ongoing healthcare transition planning and preparation; 3) monthly phone calls with the participant/caregiver to update and fill gaps in the healthcare transition action plan.
No Intervention: Control
The control group received enhanced usual care which provides standardized healthcare transition-specific written information including a written transition policy, as well as insurance and guardianship information. Participants were also provided with a transition readiness assessment and entered into a healthcare transition registry to facilitate tracking and communication.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Care Coordination
Time Frame: 2 years
Mean score of Client Perceptions of Coordination Questionnaire (CPCQ)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-level experiences of care
Time Frame: 2 years
Mean score of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire (PACIC)
2 years
Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: 2 years
Summary statistics of healthcare utilization
2 years
Healthcare cost
Time Frame: 2 years
Summary statistics of healthcare cost
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa K Tuchman, MD, MPH, Children's National Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro2500
  • R40MC23627 (Other Grant/Funding Number: HRSA MCHB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Care Coordination

Clinical Trials on Health Care Transition Care Coordination

Subscribe