Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures

October 16, 2024 updated by: Fatma Ahmad El Waseef, Mansoura University

Clinical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of CAD/CAM Milled PEEK, PMMA and Conventional Implant Assisted Overdentures

The researchers will perform a parallel randomized, clinical trial involving completely edentulous healthy patients. Each participant will receive four dental implants in the anterior mandible. According to the processing technique and denture base material, the patients will be classified into three groups. Group I: involves CAD/CAM milled poly ether ether ketone PEEK overdentures, Group II: involves CAD/CAM milled PMMA overdentures and Group III :involves conventional heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate PMMA overdentures. All assessments were carried out at delivery, 6 moths and one year after overdenture insertion to clinically evaluate the preiimplant tissues. .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted to compare three different mandibular implant- assisted complete overdentures. These overdentures were constructed from three different materials and techniques: CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone (CAD/CAM PEEK MOD), CAD/CAM-milled poly methyl methacrylate (CAD/CAM PMMA MOD), and conventional heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate (conventional PMMA MOD) to clinically evaluate the preiimplant tissues.

The participants enrolled in the current study were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the material and technique of their mandibular overdenture bases. All participants were delivered new sets of conventional complete dentures implied bilateral balanced occlusal scheme. They were well instructed to wear their dentures regularly for 3 months prior to implant installment ascribed to enhancement of the neuromuscular adaptation. For each patient, the mandibular denture was duplicated with clear auto- polymerizing acrylic resin to fabricate the mandibular surgical template with gutta percha markers. By employing CBCT, all patients were scanned conforming to the dual scan protocol .The implants were installed virtually parallel to each other and perpendicular to the occlusal plane at the areas of canines and lateral incisors .This was carried out using 3D image planning software . The surgical stent with four sleeves was constructed by rapid prototyping .It was placed over the proposed implant locations.Four dental implants were surgically placed in the anterior region of the mandible.Three months afterward, the mandibular impression was registered. The primary impression was recorded and poured to gain the primary cast. Upon that primary cast, a closed custom tray was constructed. The positioner attachments were screwed to the implants, the processing caps and metal housings were secured over them. The custom tray was border molded. By using silicon impression material , the definitive impression was made at the abutment level. The processing caps and the metal housings were removed from the impression which was being poured by extra hard scannable dental stone to obtain the master cast. Maxillomandibular relations were registered .This was accomplished with mandibular conventional record blocks opposed by the existing maxillary complete denture. Semi anatomical acrylic teeth were arranged employing bilateral balanced occlusion .The waxed overdentures were tried in the patient's mouth. According to the mandibular denture base material and processing technique of the prostheses, the subjects were divided into three groups: The first group (I) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were fabricated by milling pre-polymerized poly ether ether ketone PEEK discs (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs, the second group(II) included 10 participants whose mandibular overdentures were constructed by milling prepolymerised PMMA resin discs (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), while the third group(III) included 10 participants received conventionally constructed heat-cured poly methyl methacrylate mandibular PMMA overdentures (conventional PMMA MOD).All needed adjustments were executed at the insertion visit. This is to assure appropriate border extension, proper denture base fit, even occlusal contact besides patient comfort. The female housing attachment was picked up to the fitting surface of the mandibular overdenture bases using self-cure acrylic resin. The white processing cap was removed and replaced by a blue one. The mandibular overdentures were delivered to all participants according to their group.

Patients' evaluation Clinical evaluation Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque, bleeding, and gingival scores were assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI) and simplified gingival index (GI), respectively. These indices were evaluated at prosthesis insertion (T0), 3 months (T1) , 6 months(T3) and 12 month (T4) after insertion. A calibrated pressure-sensitive plastic periodontal probe was utilized.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35561
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Each selected subject fulfilled the following criteria:
  • all subjects complained about insufficient retention and stability pertained to their mandibular dentures at their presentation;
  • they had enough quantity and quality of bone in the mandibular lateral and canine areas to support the standard implants (14 mm in length and 3.6 mm in diameter) as verified by CBCT;
  • they had healthy keratinized mucosa and a class I maxillomandibular relationship; besides, they had enough interarch space.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes, osteoporosis, and immunological deficiency
  • subjects having head and neck radiation therapy or using anticoagulant medication.
  • Those who had a history of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, which could interfere with appropriate function,
  • those who smoked heavily were also excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CAD/CAM Milled PEEK
In the first group (CAD/CAM PEEK MODs), the mandibular master cast, mandibular trial denture, and maxillary denture were scanned using an intraoral digital scanner both separately while biting. The scanned data were saved in standard tessellation language (STL) file format and entered into the design software . The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the prepolymerised PEEK discs to construct the CAD/CAM PEEK MOD base .
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
Experimental: CAD/CAM milled PMMA
In the second group (CAD/CAM PMMA MODs), the STL file of the designed denture base was imported into the milling machine to mill the PMMA MOD base. The mandibular denture base and set-up were virtually designed. Based on the virtually created mandibular denture bases, the CAD/CAM PMMA MOD base was milled .Based on the scanned denture teeth, denture teeth were milled from tooth-coloured prepolymerized PMMA blocks, finished and polished, and then bonded with a methacrylate-based bonding agent into the PMMA milled base.
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD
Experimental: conventional PMMA MOD
the traditional heat-cured PMMA MOD was constructed. The waxed-up overdenture was processed in heat-cured PMMA resin using the compression mould technique.
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant tissue changes as bleeding score was assessed employing the bleeding index (BI) . Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD).
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards gingival scores was assessed simplified gingival index(GI). Patients were evaluated clinically at the time of mandibular overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 3 years (T3) after denture insertion. Both plaque index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were evaluated according to the Mombelli index , and gingival index (GI) according to the modified Silness and Loe index. Measurements were taken from the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. All the clinical parameters were measured from the four aspects using a graduated periodontal probe (Hawe Perio-Probe, Kerr), and the sum total of the four readings was divided by four to obtain the mean value. The distance between the marginal border of the peri-implant mucosa and the tip of the probe was measured and considered as pocket depth (PD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-Implant Tissues changes regarding plaque index (PI).
Time Frame: 2 years
Peri-implant soft tissue changes as regards plaque was assessed employing the modified plaque index (PI).
2 years
Peri-Implant Tissues changes regarding The bleeding index (BI).
Time Frame: 2 years
The bleeding index in accordance with Mombelli et al was used: score 0: no bleeding when using a periodontal probe; score1: isolated bleeding spots visible; score 2: a confluent red line of blood along the mucosal margin; score 3: heavy or profuse bleeding.
2 years
Peri-Implant Tissues changes regarding The gingival index (GI)
Time Frame: 2 years

The modified Silness and Loe index, was used to calculate the gingival index:

Score 0: normal peri implant mucosa; score 1: mild inflammation, slight color change, and slight edoema; score 2: moderate inflammation, redness, edoema, and glazing; and score 3: severe inflammation, marked redness and edoema, and ulceration.

2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Mansoura

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Authors will share individual participant data if needed upon publishing process

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implant Tissues

Clinical Trials on the plaque index (PI)

Subscribe