Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Evaluating Intervention Allocation Policies for Reducing Hospital Readmissions at Michigan Medicine

1. juli 2026 opdateret af: Jenna Wiens, University of Michigan
The researchers are investigating if using a risk-based prediction score or benefit-based prediction score to allocate transition of care (TOC) interventions is more effective in reducing the rate of unplanned hospital readmissions or death within 30 days of hospital discharge.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The intervention affects only how the TOC bundle is assigned and does not alter how the telephone calls are delivered. For example, both care navigators and pharmacists receive the same patient information and follow the same call procedures before and after the intervention.

Individuals with predicted benefits greater than the 40% quantile are assigned the phone call bundle while others were not assigned the bundle. During the trial the 40% quantile will be dynamically determined using discharge data from the previous week.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

5000

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Forenede Stater, 48109
        • The University of Michigan
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Jenna Wiens, PhD

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient meets the primary care established rule at Michigan Medicine (MM), AND
  • Patient's primary care physician (PCP) Department is one of our General Medicine or Family Medicine or Medical-Pediatrics departments, AND
  • Inpatient class is Inpatient or Observation or Obs Greater than 48 hours or Outpatient in a Bed or Extended Recovery or Hospital Care at Home Inpatient or Hospital Care at Home Observation, AND
  • Discharged from General Medicine or Family Medicine or Medicine Observation services, AND
  • Disposition of home or home with home care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physician Organization of Michigan Accountable Care Organization (POM ACO)
  • Sepsis patients (had a diagnosis of sepsis during admission, active or resolved on the hospital problem list)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Tredobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Control Arm/Standard of care
The Control Arm, in which patients with a LACE Index score of 9 or greater on the day of hospital discharge will receive TOC interventions. This is the currently implemented allocation policy at Michigan Medicine. In this setting, approximately 60% of patients receive the TOC intervention. Thus, we will use a threshold of the 40th percentile for assigning the TOC telephone call bundle. Note that to maintain the 60% intervention rate throughout the study, the score threshold (LACE 9 or greater) will be monitored and dynamically adjusted. The LACE Index has four components: Length of Stay (L), Acuity of the Admission (A), Comorbidities (C), and Emergency Department Visits (E), and estimates the risk of a patient having an unplanned hospital readmission after being discharged from their current encounter.
The LACE Index has four components: Length of Stay (L), Acuity of the Admission (A), Comorbidities (C), and Emergency Department Visits (E), and estimates the risk of a patient having an unplanned hospital readmission after being discharged from their current encounter.
Eksperimentel: Experimental Arm
The Experimental Arm, in which Causal-Hospital reAdmission Risk Prediction Model (C-HARP) scores will be used to allocate TOC interventions. C-HARP is a machine learning model that leverages routinely collected and stored patient data in the electronic health record (EHR) to estimate how much a patient will benefit from receiving MM's TOC telephone call bundle. The assignment threshold will be defined as the 40th percentile of C-HARP scores within the most recent 100 days of the target cohort, so that approximately 60% of patients are assigned the telephone call bundle. Based on current retrospective data, this threshold corresponds to a C-HARP score of 18.
The Experimental Arm will allocate TOC interventions based on scores generated by the Causal-Hospital reAdmission Risk Prediction Model (C-HARP), C-HARP is a linear model that leverages routinely collected and stored patient data in the electronic health record (EHR) to estimate how much a patient will benefit from receiving Michigan Medicine's (MM's) TOC telephone call bundle.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The number of 30-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Tidsramme: 30 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
30 calendar days following the index discharge

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
The number of 90-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Tidsramme: 90 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
90 calendar days following the index discharge
Time to first 90-day all-cause unplanned readmission or death
Tidsramme: 90 calendar days following the index discharge
An unplanned readmission is defined as any not canceled inpatient, outpatient, or observation hospital admission with an admission type not recorded as "scheduled." Deaths are determined using the Michigan Death Index and matched to patient records using Social Security numbers.
90 calendar days following the index discharge
TOC telephone call bundle completion (care navigator call)
Tidsramme: 5 calendar days after discharge.

A care navigator call is considered complete if a completed call record is observed within 5 calendar days after discharge.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

5 calendar days after discharge.
TOC telephone call bundle completion (clinical pharmacist call)
Tidsramme: 14 calendar days after discharge

A clinical pharmacist call is considered complete if a completed call record is observed within 14 calendar days after discharge.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

14 calendar days after discharge
TOC telephone call bundle completion (both calls)
Tidsramme: 14 calendar days after discharge

Completed the care navigator call and completed the clinical pharmacist call.

Calls are considered incomplete if the corresponding completed call record occurs after an all-cause unplanned readmission.

14 calendar days after discharge

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Studiestol: Jenna Wiens, PhD, University of Michigan

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. juli 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. august 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. september 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

1. juli 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

1. juli 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

8. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

8. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

1. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • HUM00282075

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ja

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Overgang af omsorg

Kliniske forsøg med The LACE Index TOC assignment

3
Abonner