- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07724262
Evaluation of the Argos System to Estimate Cardiac Output
Evaluation of the Argos System to Estimate Cardiac Output in Critically Ill Patients
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes in cardiac output in critically ill patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does cardiac output changes induced by fluid administration or changes in norepinephrine dosage can be tracked by the Argos system, compared to transpulmonary thermodilution device.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
In patients with acute circulatory failure, hemodynamic monitoring including cardiac index (CI) assessment is recommended for most severe patients. Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is one of the methods that are recommended for this purpose, in particular because it is considered as reliable in this type of patients. The PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Getinge, Feldkirchen, Germany) relies on TPTD method and associate two methods to measure CI. On the one hand, TPTD is considered as one of the gold standards for CI evaluation (CITPTD). On the other hand, pulse contour analysis calculates stroke volume from the waveform of the systolic part of the arterial pressure curve (CIpwa). The way this estimation is performed and it is regularly re-evaluated differs among the devices that are available on the market. This estimation of CIpwa is calibrated when TPTD is performed. Thus, it allows a real-time pulse contour derived CI assessment, which is very precise. However, TPTD system are considered invasive, expensive and are not available in all settings.
The Argos monitor (Retia Medical, Valhalla, USA) uses the so-called multi-beat analysis (MBA) to estimate CI after analyzing the arterial pressure waveform over periods of multiple heartbeats (up to 20) and scaling CI estimations to biometric data. The algorithm estimates the theoretical central arterial blood pressure waveform using MBA, minimizing and avoiding the cofounding effect of the wave reflection phenomena. Based on this central arterial blood pressure waveform and biometric patient data, the system estimates cardiac output. The Argos monitor has a second advantage. It simply connects to the analogue output of the blood pressure signal from a compatible multi-parameter monitor and needs no additional specific pressure sensor. During cardiac surgery, the Argos monitor showed reasonable agreement and trending ability compared to the pulmonary artery catheter. However, in patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia, CI estimated by the device was not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes of CI induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid administration, compared to CITPTD in critically ill patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Christopher Lai, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 12633816521
- Email: christopher.lai@aphp.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Recruiting
- Bicêtre Hospital
-
Contact:
- Christopher Lai
- Phone Number: 2633816521
- Email: christopher.lai@aphp.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion:
- systolic arterial pressure <90mmHg
- mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
- prolonged capillary refill time >3 sec
- mottling score > 2
- urine output < 0.1 mL/kg/h
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years old
- Hospitalisation in intensive care
- Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution already in place
Hemodynamic intervention deemed necessary by the clinician in charge of the patient
- Administration of a fluid bolus
- Change in norepinephrine dosage or performance of a vasopressor test
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Other therapeutic modification during volume expansion or the vasopressor test
- Refusal to participate by relatives of the patient or the patient himself or herself
- Non availability of investigators
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
patients with shock
Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion:
|
Giving a fluid bolus of 500mL of normal saline (NaCl 0.9%)
brief, transient increase in norepinephrine to achieve a 15mmHg increase in mean arterial pressure and evaluates if tissue perfusion improves
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
To compare the changes in cardiac output provided by the Argos system induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid bolus, compared to cardiac output provided by the transpulmonary thermodilution device in critically ill patients.
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of the Argos system
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
To evaluate the accuracy of the Argos system to measure absolute values of cardiac output compared to transpulmonary thermodilution
|
1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
|
Precision of the Argos system
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
To evaluate the precision and least significant change of cardiac output provided by the Argos system
|
1 hour (before and after intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Argos study
- CE-SRLF 24-100 (Other Identifier: SRLF)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shock
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTraumabase Group; Capgemini Invent; Ecole polytechnique; EHESS (Ecole des hautes... and other collaboratorsCompletedWounds and Injuries | Hemorrhagic Shock | Traumatic ShockFrance
-
Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbHMedical University of ViennaCompletedSepsis | Toxic-Shock Syndrome
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity Hospital BirminghamCompletedTraumatic Haemorrhagic ShockUnited Kingdom
-
Haukeland University HospitalMinistry of Defence, NorwayCompletedHemorrhagic Shock | Hypovolemic ShockNorway
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston Medical Center; Tufts Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Jason SperryNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Washington; Resuscitation Outcomes ConsortiumCompletedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
Ramathibodi HospitalUnknownSeptic Shock | Refractory ShockThailand
-
Arsenal Medical, Inc.RecruitingTrauma | Hemorrhagic Shock | Exsanguinating Hemorrhage | Shock; TraumaticUnited States
-
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)University Hospital, BonnUnknownSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockGermany
Clinical Trials on Fluid bolus
-
University Hospital Hradec KraloveUniversity Hospital PilsenCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Surgery | Endothelial Dysfunction | AnesthesiaCzechia
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedIntubation Complication | Acute Respiratory Failure | Hypotension on InductionUnited States
-
Hospital NordRecruitingFluid Responsiveness Predictability | Fluid ResuscitationFrance
-
University College, LondonUniversity of Portsmouth; University of WollongongUnknownDehydration HypertonicUnited Kingdom
-
Pakistan Institute of Medical SciencesRecruitingFluid Responsiveness Predictability in SepsisPakistan
-
Aarhus University HospitalTerminatedAcute Kidney Injury | Fluid Overload | HypoperfusionDenmark
-
Karolinska InstitutetDanderyd Hospital; Stockholm South General HospitalWithdrawnSepsis | Critical Illness | Fluid Overload | Hemodynamic InstabilitySweden
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCentral Finland Central HospitalCompletedSepsis | Acute Kidney Injury | Critically Ill | OliguriaFinland
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Humanitas Clinical and Research CenterEuropean Society of Intensive Care MedicineCompletedCritical Illness | Septic ShockItaly