Evaluation of the Argos System to Estimate Cardiac Output

July 20, 2026 updated by: Christopher Lai, Bicetre Hospital

Evaluation of the Argos System to Estimate Cardiac Output in Critically Ill Patients

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes in cardiac output in critically ill patients. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does cardiac output changes induced by fluid administration or changes in norepinephrine dosage can be tracked by the Argos system, compared to transpulmonary thermodilution device.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In patients with acute circulatory failure, hemodynamic monitoring including cardiac index (CI) assessment is recommended for most severe patients. Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is one of the methods that are recommended for this purpose, in particular because it is considered as reliable in this type of patients. The PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Getinge, Feldkirchen, Germany) relies on TPTD method and associate two methods to measure CI. On the one hand, TPTD is considered as one of the gold standards for CI evaluation (CITPTD). On the other hand, pulse contour analysis calculates stroke volume from the waveform of the systolic part of the arterial pressure curve (CIpwa). The way this estimation is performed and it is regularly re-evaluated differs among the devices that are available on the market. This estimation of CIpwa is calibrated when TPTD is performed. Thus, it allows a real-time pulse contour derived CI assessment, which is very precise. However, TPTD system are considered invasive, expensive and are not available in all settings.

The Argos monitor (Retia Medical, Valhalla, USA) uses the so-called multi-beat analysis (MBA) to estimate CI after analyzing the arterial pressure waveform over periods of multiple heartbeats (up to 20) and scaling CI estimations to biometric data. The algorithm estimates the theoretical central arterial blood pressure waveform using MBA, minimizing and avoiding the cofounding effect of the wave reflection phenomena. Based on this central arterial blood pressure waveform and biometric patient data, the system estimates cardiac output. The Argos monitor has a second advantage. It simply connects to the analogue output of the blood pressure signal from a compatible multi-parameter monitor and needs no additional specific pressure sensor. During cardiac surgery, the Argos monitor showed reasonable agreement and trending ability compared to the pulmonary artery catheter. However, in patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia, CI estimated by the device was not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes of CI induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid administration, compared to CITPTD in critically ill patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion:

  • systolic arterial pressure <90mmHg
  • mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
  • prolonged capillary refill time >3 sec
  • mottling score > 2
  • urine output < 0.1 mL/kg/h

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Hospitalisation in intensive care
  • Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution already in place
  • Hemodynamic intervention deemed necessary by the clinician in charge of the patient

    • Administration of a fluid bolus
    • Change in norepinephrine dosage or performance of a vasopressor test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Other therapeutic modification during volume expansion or the vasopressor test
  • Refusal to participate by relatives of the patient or the patient himself or herself
  • Non availability of investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with shock

Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion:

  • systolic arterial pressure <90mmHg
  • mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
  • prolonged capillary refill time >3 sec
  • mottling score > 2
  • urine output < 0.1 mL/kg/h
Giving a fluid bolus of 500mL of normal saline (NaCl 0.9%)
brief, transient increase in norepinephrine to achieve a 15mmHg increase in mean arterial pressure and evaluates if tissue perfusion improves

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the changes in cardiac output provided by the Argos system induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid bolus, compared to cardiac output provided by the transpulmonary thermodilution device in critically ill patients.
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
1 hour (before and after intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the Argos system
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
To evaluate the accuracy of the Argos system to measure absolute values of cardiac output compared to transpulmonary thermodilution
1 hour (before and after intervention)
Precision of the Argos system
Time Frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)
To evaluate the precision and least significant change of cardiac output provided by the Argos system
1 hour (before and after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on Fluid bolus

Subscribe