Clinical Application of an AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

September 16, 2026 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Clinical Application of an AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Paired Diagnostic Study and a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

In this prospective paired diagnostic study and single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with early esophageal squamous neoplasia or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in a paired diagnostic cohort (60 patients) and subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) to receive endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) guidance or conventional ESD (without AI). Clinical data and operator workload scores (NASA-TLX) are collected during the procedure, and postoperative follow-up assessments are performed at days 1, 3, 7, and 14. The study aims to analyze the impact of ADTPS on the mean single-dissection time and operator workload in patients undergoing ESD by comparing the efficacy differences between the experimental and control groups. Additionally, the study investigates the effects of ADTPS on other postoperative complications including R0 resection rate, muscularis propria injury, intraoperative bleeding, perforation (acute and delayed), and total procedure time; conducts a comparative analysis of the safety and efficiency of AI-assisted versus conventional ESD; and develops effective clinical strategies for optimizing dissection trajectory and reducing complications in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • 山东大学齐鲁医院

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese patients aged 18-80 years.

Lesions meeting ESD indications for esophageal, gastric, or colorectal early cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, as defined by:

Non-invasive tumors regardless of size; or

Differentiated-type intramucosal carcinoma without ulceration, regardless of size; or

Differentiated-type intramucosal carcinoma with ulceration and a diameter ≤3 cm; or

Undifferentiated-type intramucosal carcinoma without ulceration and a diameter ≤2 cm.

Planned to undergo ESD treatment.

No prior treatment for the lesion (including ESD, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.).

Platelet count >100 × 10⁹/L and PT-INR <1.5, with antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, etc.) discontinued for at least 5 days.

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade I or II.

Voluntarily signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently undergoing dialysis.

Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease or other severe comorbidities that may increase the risk of the ESD procedure.

Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional ESD without AI
The same endoscopic hardware platform is used, but the AI-based Dissection Trajectory Prediction System (ADTPS) is turned off. The endoscopist performs the ESD procedure based solely on clinical judgment and personal experience, following standard conventional ESD steps including marking, injection, circumferential incision, and submucosal dissection.
Experimental: AI-assisted ESD with ADTPS
The ADTPS is an artificial intelligence software system that analyzes endoscopic images in real time during ESD. It automatically identifies lesion boundaries and generates a recommended dissection trajectory overlaid on the endoscopic view. The endoscopist follows the AI-generated trajectory to perform submucosal dissection. The system provides visual guidance only and does not alter the standard surgical workflow.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NASA-TLX Workload Score
Time Frame: Immediately after the ESD procedure
Immediately after the ESD procedure
Mean Single Dissection Time
Time Frame: During the ESD procedure
During the ESD procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
R0 Resection Rate
Time Frame: At the time of pathological examination
At the time of pathological examination
Muscularis Propria Injury Rate
Time Frame: During the ESD procedure
During the ESD procedure
Intraoperative Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: During the ESD procedure
During the ESD procedure
Intraoperative Perforation Rate
Time Frame: During the ESD procedure
During the ESD procedure
Delayed Bleeding Rate
Time Frame: Within 14 days after procedure
Within 14 days after procedure
Delayed Perforation Rate
Time Frame: Within 14 days after procedure
Within 14 days after procedure
Total Procedure Time
Time Frame: During the ESD procedure
During the ESD procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe