RNA to the RESCUE: Evaluation to Assess the Clinical Utility of RNA Sequencing in Establishing a Genetic Diagnosis or Adjudicating a Previously Established Genetic Diagnosis.

August 21, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

RNAseq for the Evaluation of Splicing and Cryptic or Unrecognized Effects

The goal of this observational study is to see if ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing can improve the diagnostic yield and accuracy of genetic testing compared to gene sequencing alone. Participants will be asked to share their medical history and prior genetic testing results, and to donate a blood sample for testing.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participant will come on site for a one-time blood draw. Study personnel will review prior medical history, family history, and prior genetic testing results gathered from the participant's medical record, along with analysis of RNA sequencing results derived from participant's blood sample. Results will be shared with participants through their clinical geneticist.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94159
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kanika Bhardwaj
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Reva Frankel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients seen by the division of Medical Genetics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • individuals who have previously undergone gene panel testing, WES or WGS with no diagnostic findings but with high suspicion for a genetic etiology
  • individuals who have undergone genetic testing and who are found to have a truncating variant classified as pathogenic in a disease-causing gene but lack many/all symptoms typically associated with the disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
No genetic diagnosis
Individuals who have previously undergone gene panel testing, WES or WGS with no diagnostic findings but with high suspicion for a genetic etiology
Total RNA will be isolated from blood samples, processed, and analyzed to compare the RNA-Seq profile of each participant.
No symptomatology
Individuals who have undergone genetic testing and who are found to have a truncating variant classified as pathogenic in a disease-causing gene but lack many/all symptoms typically associated with the disorder
Total RNA will be isolated from blood samples, processed, and analyzed to compare the RNA-Seq profile of each participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RNA analysis supports that the gene variant impacts gene expression
Time Frame: From analysis of RNA-Seq data to finalized summary of research results (up to 1 year)
RNA-Seq analysis shows that the gene variant of interest impacts the gene expression with either a decreased expression, increased expression, alternative splice product, or other.
From analysis of RNA-Seq data to finalized summary of research results (up to 1 year)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Results add value to the diagnostic process
Time Frame: From clinical geneticist receiving research results to share with participant to the completion of survey (up to 3 months)
Clinical geneticist will complete a survey to indicate if they found that the research results added value to the diagnostic process.
From clinical geneticist receiving research results to share with participant to the completion of survey (up to 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kanika Bhardwaj, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Reva Frankel, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe