Relatives' level of satisfaction with advanced cancer care in Greenland - a mixed methods study

Mikaela Augustussen, Lise Hounsgaard, Michael Lynge Pedersen, Per Sjøgren, Helle Timm, Mikaela Augustussen, Lise Hounsgaard, Michael Lynge Pedersen, Per Sjøgren, Helle Timm

Abstract

Palliative cancer care in Greenland is provided by health professionals at local level, the national Queen Ingrid's Hospital and at Rigshospitalet in Denmark. To improve and develop care for relatives of patients with advanced cancer, we conducted a mixed method study examining relatives' level of satisfaction with care and treatment and their current main concerns. The aim was to investigate relatives' level of satisfaction with advanced cancer care and bring to light their current main concerns. The FAMCARE-20 questionnaire was translated to Greenlandic and pilot tested. The questionnaire was supplemented by open-ended questions about relative's current main concerns and analyzed with a phenomenological hermeneutical approach. Greenlandic patients with advanced cancer who were previously participating in a prospective study were asked if their closest adult relative would participate in the study. Telephone interviews were conducted and relatives responded to the questionnaire. A total of thirty-two relatives were contacted by telephone and 30 (94%) completed the FAMCARE-20 questionnaire and answered open-ended questions. The highest rate of satisfaction was with the availability of a hospital bed (66%) and relatives were the most dissatisfied with the lack of inclusion in decision making related to treatment and care (71%) and the length of time required to diagnose cancer (70%). Responses to the open-ended questions revealed that relatives faced challenges in gaining access to information from health professionals. They experienced a lack of security, worries about the future and a lack of support at home. The study showed a substantial level of dissatisfaction among relatives of patients with advanced cancer. We strongly recommend a focus on psychosocial care, more access to information and to include relatives in decision making and in the future planning of palliative care services. An assessment of relatives' needs is essential to develop an adequate palliative care in a range of settings.

Keywords: Greenland; Relatives; advanced cancer care; rural and remote areas; satisfaction.

References

    1. Kue Young T, Kelly JJ, Friborg J, et al. Cancer among circumpolar populations: an emerging public health concern. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016;75:1–8.
    1. The National Board of Health, chapter 9 CANCER 2013. Landslægeembedet Grønland. [cited 2017 February 13]. Available from:
    1. Government of Greenland, Ministry of Health, Cancer Report Kræftredegørelsen 2011. [cited 2017 February 13]. Available from:
    1. Statistics Greenland Greenland in figures index. Nuuk: Statistics Greenland; 2016.
    1. Government of Greenland, Ministry of Health, Cancer Report 2013 Plan for cancer treatment [cited 2017. February 13]. Available from:
    1. Statistics Greenland Populations in Families 1994-2016 [Internet]. Nuuk. 2016. [cited 2017 February 13]. Available from: ,
    1. Wilkes LM, White K, Mohan S, et al. Accessing metropolitan cancer care services: practical needs of rural families. J Psychosoc Oncol [Internet]. Clinic Nursing Research Unit, School of Nursing, Family & Comunity health, University of Western Sydney, Australia. l.wilkes@uws.edu.au; 2008;24(2):85–101. Available from:
    1. Selman L, Higginson IJ, Agupio G, et al. Meeting information needs of patients with incurable progressive disease and their families in South Africa and Uganda: multicentre qualitative study. BMJ [Internet]. L. Selman, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom. E-mail: lucy.selman@kcl.ac.uk, England: BMJ Publishing Group (Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, United Kingdom); 2009;338: doi:10.1136/bmj.b1326 Available from:
    1. Kissane DW, Zaider TI, Li Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial of family therapy in advanced cancer continued into bereavement. J Oncol Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016. June;34(16):1921–1927.
    1. Higginson IJS-G-G. Place of care in advanced cancer : a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med. 2000;3:287–300.
    1. Selman L, Higginson IJ, Agupio G, et al. Meeting information needs of patients with incurable progressive disease and their families in South Africa and Uganda: multicentre qualitative study. Bmj. 2009;338:b1326.
    1. Breen LJ, O’Connor M. Rural health professionals’ perspectives on providing grief and loss support in cancer care. Eur J Cancer Care. 2013. November;22(6):765–772.
    1. Johnsen AT, Ross L, Petersen MA, et al. The relatives’ perspective on advanced cancer care in Denmark. A cross-sectional survey. Supportive Care Cancer. 2012. December;20(12):3179–3188.
    1. R. E, D. S, G. E Organizing palliative care for rural populations: A systematic review of the evidence [Internet]. Family Practice. 2003. p. 304–310. Available from:
    1. Kristjanson L. Validity and reliability testing of the famcare scale : measuring family satisfaction with advanced cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(5):693–701.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)— A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
    1. Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:145–153. Available from:
    1. Ricoeur P. Interpretation theory- discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University; 1976.
    1. Lockie SJ, Bottorff JL, Robinson CA, et al. Experiences of rural family caregivers who assist with commuting for palliative care. Can J Nurs Res Can. 2010;42(1):74–91.
    1. Departementet for Sundhed D Muligheder for rehabiliterende og lindrende (palliativ) indsats til personer med livstruende sygdom. Nuuk, Greenland; 2015.
    1. Guldin M-B, Vedsted P, Zachariae R, et al. Complicated grief and need for professional support in family caregivers of cancer patients in palliative care: a longitudinal cohort study. Supportive Care Cancer. 2012. August;20(8):1679–1685.
    1. Applebaum AJ, Breitbart W. Care for the cancer caregiver: a systematic review. Palliat Support Care. 2013;11:231–252.
    1. Ringdal GI, Jordhøy MS, Kaasa S. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care for cancer patients in a cluster randomized trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24(1):53–63.
    1. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(12):1829–1843.
    1. Gracey M, King M. Indigenous health part 1: determinants and disease patterns. The Lancet. 2009;374(9683):65–75. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60914-4
    1. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(4):509–516.
    1. Wilkes L, White K, O’Riordan L. Empowerment through information: supporting rural families of oncology patients in palliative care. Aust J Rural Health. 2000. February;8(1):41–46.
    1. Pesut B, Robinson CA, Bottorff JL, et al. On the road again: patient perspectives on commuting for palliative care. Palliat Support Care. 2010. June;8(2):187–195.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe