Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?

Michael Zyskowski, Markus Wurm, Frederik Greve, Sebastian Pesch, Francesca von Matthey, Patrick Pflüger, Moritz Crönlein, Peter Biberthaler, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Michael Zyskowski, Markus Wurm, Frederik Greve, Sebastian Pesch, Francesca von Matthey, Patrick Pflüger, Moritz Crönlein, Peter Biberthaler, Chlodwig Kirchhoff

Abstract

Background: In the modern western world appraisal of economical points such as treatment and disability after trauma present a financial burden. In this context open reduction internal fixation techniques allowing for early full weight bearing might not only improve the clinical outcome but also shorten the period of disability in working life. The aim of the study was to analyze whether ORIF of ankle fractures using either a standard semitubular plate or a new polyaxial locking plate system result in a better clinical outcome.

Methods: In this prospective study, all patients with distal fibula fractures (AO 44 B1.1, B1.2, B1.3), with indication for surgery were included. Patients were randomized to either the DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or NEWCLIP TECHNICS, Active Ankle® polyaxial locking plate (Group II). Primary outcome parameter was function of the ankle joint, assessed by the Olerud and Molander ankle score, Foot and Ankle outcome score and Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle function. Secondary outcome parameter were postoperative complications. Superficial wound infection, delayed wound healing, mechanically prominent implant, skin irritations were considered as minor and deep wound infection, material loosening, loss of reduction were regarded as major complications requiring revision surgery. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.

Results: Fifty-two patients (31 W/21 M) with a mean age of 43 yrs. (range 22-64 yrs.) were enrolled. Seven patients (13.5%) were excluded, so that 45 patients were available for follow up. Twenty-five patients were treated with DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (55.6%; group I) while 20 patients received an anatomically preformed polyaxial locking plate (44.4%, group II). Four minor complications occurred in Group I (16%) compared to two minor complications in group II (10%). Significant better clinical results regarding OMAS (p < 0.02, < 0.04), KPSS (p < 0.04) and FAOS (p < 0.02, < 0.03) were observed 6 and 12 weeks after surgery in group II.

Conclusions: The results of the presented study demonstrate a significant better clinical functional outcome in the early postoperative follow-up in patients treated with a polyaxial locking plate. Furthermore, our data show that ORIF using polyaxial locking plates in combination with an early postoperative weight bearing presents a safe, stable treatment option for ankle fractures so that patients benefit especially in the early stages of recovery.

Trial registration: Registered 20 April 2020, retrospectively on ClinicalTrails.gov ( NCT04370561 ).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no financial or personal conflicts of interests that could have influenced this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results of functional Ankle Scores in terms of OMAS, FAOS and KPSS for both groups separately 6 and 12 weeks as well as 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results are given as ⌀ mean and +/− standard deviation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiograph of an 18-year-old male patient suffering from an AO type 44B1.1 fracture in two planes (a). The patient was treated with the Newclip Technics® Active ankle system. Figure b shows the radiographic follow-up 6 weeks after surgery with image c) presenting the follow-up after 12 months. Finally image d) demonstrates the status after hardware removal (13 months postop)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiographs in two planes of a 38-year-old male patient with an AO type 44B1.1 fracture (a) treated with the DePuy Synthes® one-third semi tubular plate system. Six weeks (b) and 12 months (c) postoperative follow-up radiographs as well as the control after hardware removal (12 months postop, d) are shown as well

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130.
    1. Bauer M, et al. Malleolar fractures: nonoperative versus operative treatment. A controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:17–27.
    1. Sanders DW, Tieszer C, Corbett B. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of unstable lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized multicenter trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(3):129–134. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182460837.
    1. Makwana NK, et al. Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(4):525–529. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B4.0830525.
    1. Kristensen KD. Ankle Fractures: supination-eversion Fractures of stage IV: primary and late results of operative and non—operative treatment AU – Yde, Johannes. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51(1–6):981–990.
    1. Phillips WA, et al. A prospective, randomized study of the management of severe ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(1):67–78. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198567010-00010.
    1. Eckel TT, et al. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(11):1588–1595. doi: 10.1177/1071100713496223.
    1. Hess F, Sommer C. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):110–115. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d9e875.
    1. Kim T, et al. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46(1):2–6. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.09.009.
    1. Klos K, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of plate osteosynthesis of distal fibula fractures with biodegradable devices. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(3):243–251. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0243.
    1. Leyes M, Torres R, Guillen P. Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8(1):131–147. doi: 10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00162-6.
    1. Tsukada S, et al. Locking versus non-locking neutralization plates for treatment of lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2013;37(12):2451–2456. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2109-9.
    1. Yeo ED, et al. A specialized fibular locking plate for lateral Malleolar Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(6):1067–1071. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.06.002.
    1. Zaghloul A, et al. Early complications of surgery in operative treatment of ankle fractures in those over 60: a review of 186 cases. Injury. 2014;45(4):780–783. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.008.
    1. Schepers T, et al. Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures. Injury. 2011;42(10):1125–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.009.
    1. Daly PJ, et al. Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(5):539–544. doi: 10.3109/17453678709146395.
    1. Curtis EM, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988-2012: variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Bone. 2016;87:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.03.006.
    1. Thur CK, et al. Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures in Sweden between 1987 and 2004: a population-based study of 91,410 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(3):276–281. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.672091.
    1. Ahl T, et al. Early weight bearing of displaced ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(5):535–538. doi: 10.3109/17453678709146394.
    1. Ahl T, Dalen N, Selvik G. Mobilization after operation of ankle fractures. Good results of early motion and weight bearing. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988;59(3):302–306. doi: 10.3109/17453678809149368.
    1. Simanski CJ, et al. Functional treatment and early weightbearing after an ankle fracture: a prospective study. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(2):108–114. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000197701.96954.8c.
    1. van Laarhoven CJ, Meeuwis JD, van der Werken C. Postoperative treatment of internally fixed ankle fractures: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(3):395–399. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B3.0780395.
    1. Amaha K, et al. Shorter recovery can be achieved from using walking boot after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2017;7:10–14.
    1. Kortekangas T, et al. Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures. BMJ. 2019;364:k5432.
    1. Nguyentat A, et al. A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plate fixation for distal fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar ankle injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(1):132–135. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.08.017.
    1. Lyle SA, Malik C, Oddy MJ. Comparison of locking versus nonlocking plates for distal fibula Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(4):664–667. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.035.
    1. Zahn RK, et al. A contoured locking plate for distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury. 2012;43(6):718–725. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.009.
    1. El-Zayat BF, et al. Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures - a biomechanical comparison of the non-contact-bridging- (NCB) and the PERILOC-plate. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:369. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-369.
    1. Yenna ZC, et al. Polyaxial screws in locked plating of Tibial Pilon Fractures. Orthopedics. 2015;38(8):e663–e667. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150804-51.
    1. Mehling I, et al. Are there any differences in various polyaxial locking systems? A mechanical study of different locking screws in multidirectional angular stable distal radius plates. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2013;58(2):187–194. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0105.
    1. van Olden GD. VA-LCP anterior clavicle plate: the anatomically precontoured fixation system with angular stability for clavicle shaft. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014;98(3):217–223. doi: 10.1007/s12306-013-0302-z.
    1. Crönlein M, et al. Using an anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plate system leads to reliable results in comminuted radial head fractures. 2017;137(6):789–95.
    1. Huang Z, et al. Comparison of three plate system for lateral malleolar fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:360. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-360.
    1. Moss LK, et al. Implant failure rates and cost analysis of contoured locking versus conventional plate fixation of distal fibula Fractures. Orthopedics. 2017;40(6):e1024–e1029. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20171012-05.
    1. Petruccelli R, et al. Tubular vs profile plate in peroneal or Bimalleolar Fractures: is there a real difference in skin complication? A retrospective study in three level I trauma center. Mediev Archaeol. 2017;71(4):265–269.
    1. Weber BG, Colton C. Malleolar Fractures, in Manual of INTERNAL FIXATION: Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1991. pp. 595–612.
    1. Hocevar LA, Fitzgerald BM. American Society of Anesthesiologists Staging, in StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2019.
    1. Müller M, et al. Documentation of self-reported patient outcomes in trauma surgery : clinical benefits of patient reported outcome measures. Unfallchirurg. 2020;123(5):354–359. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00802-w.
    1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU) Autoren: H. Belzl, U. Ernst, S. Heining, U. Hirsch, T. Riedel, J. Schmidt, M. Settner, S. Simmel 4. Auflage. 2018. National Consent on Rehabilitation.
    1. Hayes MJPB. Experimental developement of the graphics rating method. 1921;18:98–9.
    1. Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103(3):190–194. doi: 10.1007/BF00435553.
    1. Becher C, et al. Validierung der deutschen Version des Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) Fuß Sprunggelenk. 2014;12(4):183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.fuspru.2014.10.001.
    1. Karlsson J, Peterson L. Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. Foot. 1991;1(1):15–19. doi: 10.1016/0958-2592(91)90006-W.
    1. LAUGE N. FRACTURES OF THE ANKLE: analytic historic survey as THE basis of new experimental, Roentgenologic and clinical investigations. Arch Surg. 1948;56(3):259–317. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1948.01240010266001.
    1. Yde J. The Lauge Hansen classification of Malleolar Fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51(1–6):181–192. doi: 10.3109/17453678008990784.
    1. Hanschen M, et al. Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial. Int Orthop. 2014;38(4):857–863. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2210-0.
    1. Chang G, et al. Economic analysis of anatomic plating versus tubular plating for the treatment of fibula Fractures. Orthopedics. 2018;41(2):e252–e256. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180213-01.
    1. Knutsen AR, et al. Distal fibula fracture fixation: biomechanical evaluation of three different fixation implants. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(4):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.007.
    1. Switaj PJ, et al. Comparison of modern locked plating and antiglide plating for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibular fractures. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(3):158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.06.007.
    1. Hallbauer J, et al. Does a polyaxial-locking system confer benefits for osteosynthesis of the distal fibula: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(5):645–649. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.014.
    1. Dogra AS, Rangan A. Early mobilisation versus immobilisation of surgically treated ankle fractures. Prospective randomised control trial. Injury. 1999;30(6):417–419. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00110-2.
    1. Gul A, et al. Immediate unprotected weight-bearing of operatively treated ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(3):360–365.
    1. Passias BJ, et al. Safety of early weight bearing following fixation of Bimalleolar ankle Fractures. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7557.
    1. Jensen SL, et al. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):48–50. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002356.
    1. Herrera-Perez M, et al. Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study. Injury. 2017;48(Suppl 6):S60–s65. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30796-9.
    1. Dehghan N, et al. Early Weightbearing and range of motion versus non-Weightbearing and immobilization after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle Fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):345–352. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000572.
    1. Shih CA, et al. Treating AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fracture in patients over 50 years of age: periarticular locking plate versus non-locking plate. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01622-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe