Health care workers' experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis

Emma Nilsing Strid, Charlotte Wåhlin, Axel Ros, Susanne Kvarnström, Emma Nilsing Strid, Charlotte Wåhlin, Axel Ros, Susanne Kvarnström

Abstract

Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of occupational injuries and approximately 10-15% of patients are affected by an adverse event during their hospital stay. There is scarce scientific literature about how HCWs manage these risks in practice and what support they need. This knowledge is needed to improve safety for patients and HCWs. This study explores HCWs' experiences of workplace incidents that led to injury or posed a risk of patient and worker injury, with focus on HCWs' emotions and actions.

Methods: This study employed a qualitative design using the critical incident technique. Semi-structured individual interviews were held with 34 HCWs from three regions in Sweden. Data were analysed using inductive category development.

Results: Altogether 71 workplace incidents were reported. The analysis of two dimensions - the emotions HCWs feel and the actions team members and managers take when a workplace incident occurs - yielded two categories each: Anxiety during the incident, Persistent distress after the incident, Team interplay for safety actions and Support and ratification from managers and colleagues. Health care workers risked their own safety and health to provide patient safety. Teamwork and trustful relationships were critical for patient and worker safety. Support and validation from colleagues and managers were important for closure; unsatisfactory manager response and insufficient opportunities to debrief the incident could lead to persistent negative emotions. Participants described insecurity and fear, sadness over being injured at work, and shame and self-regret when the patient or themselves were injured. When the workplace had not taken the expected action, they felt anger and resignation, often turning into long-term distress.

Conclusions: Work situations leading to injury or risk of patient and worker injury are emotionally distressing for HCWs. Team interplay may facilitate safe and dynamic practices and help HCWs overcome negative emotions. Organizational support is imperative for individual closure. For safety in health care, employers need to develop strategies for active management of risks, avoiding injuries and providing support after an injury.

Keywords: Musculoskeletal pain; Occupational health; Patient safety; Psychological distress; Safety management.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare.

References

    1. Miller K. Risk factors and impacts of occupational injury in healthcare workers: a critical review. 2013 mar 01;1(1):4. OA Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2013;1(1):1–6. doi: 10.13172/2052-9287-1-1-447.
    1. Cooke CE, Stephens JM. Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Med Devices (Aukl) 2017;10:225–235. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140846.
    1. Andersen LL, Vinstrup J, Villadsen E, Jay K, Jakobsen MD. Physical and Psychosocial Work Environmental Risk Factors for Back Injury among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22).
    1. Pompeii LA, Lipscomb HJ, Schoenfisch AL, Dement JM. Musculoskeletal injuries resulting from patient handling tasks among hospital workers. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(7):571–578. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20704.
    1. Liu J, Gan Y, Jiang H, Li L, Dwyer R, Lu K, Yan S, Sampson O, Xu H, Wang C, Zhu Y, Chang Y, Yang Y, Yang T, Chen Y, Song F, Lu Z. Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(12):927–937. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105849.
    1. Statistiska Centralbyrån. Statistics Sweden. Hot, våld och oro 1980–2017 [Treats, violence and worry 1980–2017]. In: Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden ULF/SILC [Survey on Living Conditions ULF/SILC]. Stockholm; 2018. Swedish.
    1. Wåhlin CKS, Öhrn A, Nilsing SE. Patient and healthcare worker safety risks and injuries. Learning from incident reporting. Eur J Phys. 2020;22(1):44–50.
    1. Rodriguez-Acosta RL, Richardson DB, Lipscomb HJ, Chen JC, Dement JM, Myers DJ, et al. Occupational injuries among aides and nurses in acute care. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(12):953–964. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20762.
    1. Bernal D, Campos-Serna J, Tobias A, Vargas-Prada S, Benavides FG, Serra C. Work-related psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses and nursing aides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(2):635–648. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.003.
    1. Davis KG, Kotowski SE. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders for nurses in hospitals, long-term care facilities, and home health care: a comprehensive review. Hum Factors. 2015;57(5):754–792. doi: 10.1177/0018720815581933.
    1. World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Making health care safer. Geneva; 2017.
    1. Mira JJ, Lorenzo S, Carrillo I, Ferrus L, Silvestre C, Astier P, et al. Lessons learned for reducing the negative impact of adverse events on patients, health professionals and healthcare organizations. Int J Qual Health. 2017;29(4):450–460. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx056.
    1. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Safe Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–223. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.
    1. Rafter N, Hickey A, Condell S, Conroy R, O'Connor P, Vaughan D, Williams D. Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes. QJM. 2015;108(4):273–277. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu145.
    1. Pousette A, Larsman P, Eklof M, Torner M. The relationship between patient safety climate and occupational safety climate in healthcare - a multi-level investigation. J Saf Res. 2017;61:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.020.
    1. Agnew C, Flin R, Mearns K. Patient safety climate and worker safety behaviours in acute hospitals in Scotland. J Saf Res. 2013;45:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.008.
    1. Taylor JA, Dominici F, Agnew J, Gerwin D, Morlock L, Miller MR. Do nurse and patient injuries share common antecedents? An analysis of associations with safety climate and working conditions. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(2):101–111. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000082.
    1. Hofmann DA, Mark B. An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurse and patient outcomes. Pers Psychol. 2006;59(4):847–869. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00056.x.
    1. Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods : Integrating theory and practice. 4. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 2015.
    1. Wu AW, Shapiro J, Harrison R, Scott SD, Connors C, Kenney L, Vanhaecht K. The impact of adverse events on clinicians: What's in a name? J Patient Saf. 2017;16(1):65–72. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000256.
    1. Busch IM, Moretti F, Purgato M, Barbui C, Wu AW, Rimondini M. Psychological and psychosomatic symptoms of second victims of adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Patient Saf. 2019;16(2):e61–e74. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000589.
    1. Chan ST, Khong PCB, Wang W. Psychological responses, coping and supporting needs of healthcare professionals as second victims. Int Nurs Rev. 2017;64(2):242–262. doi: 10.1111/inr.12317.
    1. Cabilan CJ, Kynoch K. Experiences of and support for nurses as second victims of adverse nursing errors: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(9):2333–2364. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003254.
    1. Jeong JS, Son HM, Jeong IS, Son JS, Shin KS, Yoonchang SW, Jin HY, Han SH, Han SH. Qualitative content analysis of psychologic discomfort and coping process after needlestick injuries among health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(2):183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.002.
    1. Amalberti R, Vincent C. Managing risk in hazardous conditions: improvisation is not enough. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;29(1):60–63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009443.
    1. Braithwaite J, Wears RL, Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(5):418–420. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv063.
    1. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51(4):327–358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470.
    1. Bragazzi NL, Dini G, Parodi V, Blasi C, Linares R, Mortara V, Toletone A, Bersi FM, D’Amico B, Massa E, Montecucco A, Debarbieri N, Durando P. Protocol of a scoping review assessing injury rates and their determinants among healthcare workers in western countries. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023372.
    1. Schluter J, Seaton P, Chaboyer W. Critical incident technique: a user's guide for nurse researchers. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(1):107–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04490.x.
    1. Fridlund B, Henricson M, Mårtensson J. Critical incident technique applied in nursing and healthcare sciences. SOJ Nurs Health Care. 2017;3(1):1–5. doi: 10.15226/2471-6529/3/1/00125.
    1. Viergever RF. The critical incident technique: method or methodology? Qual Health Res. 2019;29(7):1065–1079. doi: 10.1177/1049732318813112.
    1. Svensson A, Fridlund B. Experiences of and actions towards worries among ambulance nurses in their professional life: a critical incident study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2008;16(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2007.10.002.
    1. Eriksson K, Wikstrom L, Fridlund B, Arestedt K, Brostrom A. Patients' experiences and actions when describing pain after surgery--a critical incident technique analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;56:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.12.008.
    1. Wikstrom L, Eriksson K, Fridlund B, Arestedt K, Brostrom A. Healthcare professionals' descriptions of care experiences and actions when assessing postoperative pain - a critical incident technique analysis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(4):802–812. doi: 10.1111/scs.12308.
    1. Izard CE. The many meanings/aspects of emotion: definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. EMR. 2010;2(4):363–370.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698–714. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698.
    1. Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS. Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manag. 2017;43(6):1854–1884. doi: 10.1177/0149206315575554.
    1. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–507. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500.
    1. Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):215–257. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X.
    1. Fairbanks RJ, Wears RL, Woods DD, Hollnagel E, Plsek P, Cook RI. Resilience and resilience engineering in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(8):376–383. doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(14)40049-7.
    1. Eklöf M, Törner M, Pousette A. Organizational and social-psychological conditions in healthcare and their importance for patient and staff safety. A critical incident study among doctors and nurses. Saf Sci. 2014;70:211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.007.
    1. O'Keeffe VJ, Tuckey MR, Naweed A. Whose safety? Flexible risk assessment boundaries balance nurse safety with patient care. Saf Sci. 2015;76:111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.024.
    1. O'Keeffe VJ, Thompson KR, Tuckey MR, Blewett VL. Putting safety in the frame: Nurses' Sensemaking at work. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015;2:2333393615592390.
    1. Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. Patient injury and physical restraint devices: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(3):274–282. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02501.x.
    1. Heckemann B, Hahn S, Halfens RJG, Richter D, Schols J. Patient and visitor aggression in healthcare: a survey exploring organisational safety culture and team efficacy. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(5):1039–1046. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12772.
    1. Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safer healthcare: strategies for the real world. Cham: Springer; 2016.
    1. Lincoln SY, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1985. Naturalistic inquiry.
    1. Coar L, Sim J. Interviewing one's peers: methodological issues in a study of health professionals. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(4):251–256. doi: 10.1080/02813430601008479.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe