Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: the validity of self-reported health measures

J N Katz, L Punnett, B P Simmons, A H Fossel, N Mooney, R B Keller, J N Katz, L Punnett, B P Simmons, A H Fossel, N Mooney, R B Keller

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of self-reported measures of health related quality of life in recipients and non-recipients of workers' compensation who have carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome complete questionnaires at study enrollment and 6 months later scales measuring symptom severity functional status, and satisfaction were included. The scales internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness were assessed.

Results: The internal consistencies for each scale were high (Cronbach's alpha .88 to .96) and virtually identical in recipients and nonrecipients of workers' compensation. The correlations between self-reported and objectively measured grip strength were .32 in recipients and .30 in nonrecipients; these correlations were not influenced by whether workers' compensation recipients were out of work. Correlations between changes in scale scores and three indicators of perceived improvement were higher in recipients (.48 to .69) than in nonrecipients (.19 to .41)

Conclusions: The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of these measures were comparable in nonrecipients and recipients of workers compensation, these data support the use of self-report measures in studies of workers.

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):190-6
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Oct;19(5):297-312
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 May;37(5):687-94
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1111-5; discussion 1116
    1. Med Care. 1994 Nov;32(11):1127-33
    1. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):57-67
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Mar;11(2):141-3
    1. Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565-78
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Feb 15;110(4):259-66
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Dec;69(12):1044-53
    1. Occup Med. 1988 Jan-Mar;3(1):109-21
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):947-55
    1. Lancet. 1990 Feb 17;335(8686):393-5
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Mar 1;112(5):321-7
    1. J Occup Med. 1990 Jan;32(1):38-41
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jan;16(1):1-6
    1. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622-9
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):556-65

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe