Biomarkers associated with blinatumomab outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Andrew H Wei, Josep-Maria Ribera, Richard A Larson, David Ritchie, Armin Ghobadi, Yuqi Chen, Abraham Anderson, Cedric E Dos Santos, Janet Franklin, Hagop Kantarjian, Andrew H Wei, Josep-Maria Ribera, Richard A Larson, David Ritchie, Armin Ghobadi, Yuqi Chen, Abraham Anderson, Cedric E Dos Santos, Janet Franklin, Hagop Kantarjian

Abstract

This study aimed to identify biomarkers for clinical outcomes in a phase 3 clinical study of blinatumomab or chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive blinatumomab, a BiTE® therapy, for 4 weeks (9 μg/day cycle 1 week 1, 28 μg/day thereafter) every 6 weeks, or chemotherapy. Baseline blood samples were evaluated to identify biomarkers prognostic (both treatment groups) or predictive (either treatment groups) for overall survival, event-free survival, hematologic remission, minimal residual disease (MRD) response, duration of response, or adverse events. Baseline values were balanced between treatment groups. Prognostic biomarkers were platelets, tumor burden, and percentage of T cells: each 1-log increase in platelets at baseline was prognostic for improved 6-month survival; lower tumor burden was prognostic for hematologic remission; and a higher percentage of CD3+ T-cells was prognostic for MRD response. Consistent with the BiTE mechanism of action, higher percentage of CD45+ CD3+ CD8+ T cells was associated with hematologic remission following blinatumomab. No examined biomarkers were significant for the risk of grade ≥3 adverse events. Incorporating baseline biomarkers into future studies may help to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from blinatumomab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02013167.

Conflict of interest statement

AW has received honoraria from and has served on an advisory board for Amgen. J-MR has received research funding from and has served on speakers’ bureaus for Amgen, Pfizer, Incyte, and Ariad Pharmaceuticals. RAL has received research funding and honoraria from Amgen. DR has received honoraria from Amgen. AG has served on an advisory board for Amgen. YC, AA, CEDS, and JF are employees and stock holders of Amgen. HK has received research funding and honoraria from Amgen, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Immunogen, and Orsenix.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Baseline biomarkers evaluated for association…
Fig. 1. Baseline biomarkers evaluated for association with overall survival, event-free survival, and duration of response.
a Overall survival. b Event-free survival. c Duration of response. For overall survival, a hazard ratio of <1 indicates that higher levels of the biomarker were prognostic or predictive for improved overall survival. aLOG10 transformed. CD45+ CD3− CD19+ B cells are expressed as a percentage of circulating lymphocytes. Bone marrow blasts are a percentage of all nucleated marrow cells. CI confidence interval.
Fig. 2. Baseline biomarkers and 6-month survival…
Fig. 2. Baseline biomarkers and 6-month survival probabilities.
a A lower percentage of CD45+ CD3− CD19+ B lymphocytes at baseline was associated with higher 6-month survival probability in the blinatumomab group; this association was less pronounced in the chemotherapy (SOC) group. b For both treatment groups combined, higher platelet counts at baseline were associated with higher 6-month survival probability. aLOG10 transformed.
Fig. 3. Relationship between baseline biomarkers and…
Fig. 3. Relationship between baseline biomarkers and hematologic remission during blinatumomab (BLIN) or chemotherapy (SOC).
Percentage of (a) bone marrow (BM) blasts, (b) CD3+ CD4+ T cells, (c) CD3+ CD8+ T cells, (d) CD19+ B cells, and (e) CD3+ T cells at baseline in patients with (CR+) or without (Non CR+) hematologic remission (CR, CRh, and CRi). f Baseline CD3+:CD19+ (E:T) ratio in patients with or without hematologic remission. The red horizontal line indicates the median value and the box includes the 25th and 75th percentile values. CR complete remission with full hematologic recovery, CRh complete remission with partial hematologic recovery, CRi complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery, SOC standard of care.
Fig. 4. Relationship between baseline biomarkers and…
Fig. 4. Relationship between baseline biomarkers and hematologic remission during blinatumomab (BLIN) or chemotherapy (SOC) as first salvage therapy or as second or later salvage therapy.
Percentage of (a) bone marrow (BM) blasts, (b) CD3+ CD4+ T cells, (c) CD3+ CD8+ T cells, (d) CD19+ B cells, and (e) CD3+ T cells at baseline in patients with (CR+) or without (Non CR+) hematologic remission (CR, CRh, and CRi). f Baseline CD3+:CD19+ (E:T) ratio in patients with or without hematologic remission. The red horizontal line indicates the median value and the box includes the 25th and 75th percentile values. CR complete remission with full hematologic recovery, CRh complete remission with partial hematologic recovery, CRi complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery, SOC standard of care.
Fig. 5. Baseline biomarkers evaluated for association…
Fig. 5. Baseline biomarkers evaluated for association with hematologic remission and minimal residual disease.
a Hematologic remission. b minimal residual disease (MRD) response. When the odds ratio was >1, the biomarker was prognostic or predictive for increased likelihood of hematologic remission or MRD response. CR/CRh/CRi = complete remission with full (CR), partial (CRh), or incomplete (CRi) recovery of peripheral blood counts. MRD response = an MRD level below 10−4 (by PCR or flow cytometry). aLOG10 transformed. T cells are expressed as a percentage of circulating lymphocytes. Bone marrow blasts are a percentage of all nucleated marrow cells. CI confidence interval, PCR polymerase chain reaction.

References

    1. Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Ribera JM, Fielding AK, Advani A, Bassan R, et al. International reference analysis of outcomes in adults with B-precursor Ph-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2016;101:1524–33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.144311.
    1. Raponi S, De Propris MS, Intoppa S, Milani ML, Vitale A, Elia L, et al. Flow cytometric study of potential target antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22, CD33) for antibody-based immunotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of 552 cases. Leuk lymphoma. 2011;52:1098–107. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.559668.
    1. Piccaluga PP, Arpinati M, Candoni A, Laterza C, Paolini S, Gazzola A, et al. Surface antigens analysis reveals significant expression of candidate targets for immunotherapy in adult acute lymphoid leukemia. Leuk lymphoma. 2011;52:325–7. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2010.529206.
    1. Löffler A, Gruen M, Wuchter C, Schriever F, Kufer P, Dreier T, et al. Efficient elimination of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia B cells by autologous T cells with a bispecific anti-CD19/anti-CD3 single-chain antibody construct. Leukemia. 2003;17:900–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402890.
    1. Bargou R, Leo E, Zugmaier G, Klinger M, Goebeler M, Knop S, et al. Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T cell-engaging antibody. Science. 2008;321:974–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1158545.
    1. Kantarjian H, Stein A, Gokbuget N, Fielding AK, Schuh AC, Ribera JM, et al. Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl J Med. 2017;376:836–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609783.
    1. Nägele V, Kratzer A, Zugmaier G, Holland C, Hijazi Y, Topp MS, et al. Changes in clinical laboratory parameters and pharmacodynamic markers in response to blinatumomab treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017;6:14. doi: 10.1186/s40164-017-0074-5.
    1. Topp MS, Gokbuget N, Stein AS, Zugmaier G, O’Brien S, Bargou RC, et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71170-2.
    1. Nagorsen D, Baeuerle PA. Immunomodulatory therapy of cancer with T cell-engaging BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Exp cell Res. 2011;317(May):1255–60. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.03.010.
    1. Klinger M, Brandl C, Zugmaier G, Hijazi Y, Bargou RC, Topp MS, et al. Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood. 2012;119:6226–33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515.
    1. Topp MS, Gokbuget N, Zugmaier G, Klappers P, Stelljes M, Neumann S, et al. Phase II trial of the anti-CD19 bispecific T cell-engager blinatumomab shows hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:4134–40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3247.
    1. Zugmaier G, Gokbuget N, Klinger M, Viardot A, Stelljes M, Neumann S, et al. Long-term survival and T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory ALL patients who achieved MRD response after blinatumomab treatment. Blood. 2015;126:2578–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-649111.
    1. Xu Y, Hijazi Y, Wolf A, Wu B, Sun YN, Zhu M. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to assess the influence of blinatumomab-mediated cytokine elevations on cytochrome P450 enzyme activity. CPT: Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2015;4:507–15.
    1. Zhu M, Kratzer A, Johnson J, Holland C, Brandl C, Singh I, et al. Blinatumomab pharmacodynamics and exposure-response relationships in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58:168–79. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1006.
    1. Brüggemann M, Schrauder A, Raff T, Pfeifer H, Dworzak M, Ottmann OG, et al. Standardized MRD quantification in European ALL trials: proceedings of the Second International Symposium on MRD assessment in Kiel, Germany, 18–20 September 2008. Leukemia. 2010;24:521–35. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.268.
    1. Borowitz MJ, Wood BL, Devidas M, Loh ML, Raetz EA, Salzer WL, et al. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in high risk B-ALL: a report from Children’s Oncology Group study AALL0232. Blood. 2015;126:964–71. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-633685.
    1. Thomas DA, Kantarjian H, Smith TL, Koller C, Cortes J, O’Brien S, et al. Primary refractory and relapsed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: characteristics, treatment results, and prognosis with salvage therapy. Cancer. 1999;86:1216–30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991001)86:7<1216::AID-CNCR17>;2-O.
    1. Gökbuget N, Stanze D, Beck J, Diedrich H, Horst HA, Huttmann A, et al. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120:2032–41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-399287.
    1. Baeuerle PA, Reinhardt C. Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4941–4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0547.
    1. Nagorsen D, Kufer P, Baeuerle PA, Bargou R. Blinatumomab: a historical perspective. Pharm Ther. 2012;136:334–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.07.013.
    1. Hay KA, Hanafi LA, Li D, Gust J, Liles WC, Wurfel MM, et al. Kinetics and biomarkers of severe cytokine release syndrome after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy. Blood. 2017;130:2295–306. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-793141.
    1. Santomasso BD, Park JH, Salloum D, Riviere I, Flynn J, Mead E, et al. Clinical and biological correlates of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:958–71. doi: 10.1158/-17-1319.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe