Hydroxychloroquine in patients with mainly mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019: open label, randomised controlled trial

Wei Tang, Zhujun Cao, Mingfeng Han, Zhengyan Wang, Junwen Chen, Wenjin Sun, Yaojie Wu, Wei Xiao, Shengyong Liu, Erzhen Chen, Wei Chen, Xiongbiao Wang, Jiuyong Yang, Jun Lin, Qingxia Zhao, Youqin Yan, Zhibin Xie, Dan Li, Yaofeng Yang, Leshan Liu, Jieming Qu, Guang Ning, Guochao Shi, Qing Xie, Wei Tang, Zhujun Cao, Mingfeng Han, Zhengyan Wang, Junwen Chen, Wenjin Sun, Yaojie Wu, Wei Xiao, Shengyong Liu, Erzhen Chen, Wei Chen, Xiongbiao Wang, Jiuyong Yang, Jun Lin, Qingxia Zhao, Youqin Yan, Zhibin Xie, Dan Li, Yaofeng Yang, Leshan Liu, Jieming Qu, Guang Ning, Guochao Shi, Qing Xie

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19).

Design: Multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 16 government designated covid-19 treatment centres in China, 11 to 29 February 2020.

Participants: 150 patients admitted to hospital with laboratory confirmed covid-19 were included in the intention to treat analysis (75 patients assigned to hydroxychloroquine plus standard of care, 75 to standard of care alone).

Interventions: Hydroxychloroquine administrated at a loading dose of 1200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintenance dose of 800 mg daily (total treatment duration: two or three weeks for patients with mild to moderate or severe disease, respectively).

Main outcome measure: Negative conversion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by 28 days, analysed according to the intention to treat principle. Adverse events were analysed in the safety population in which hydroxychloroquine recipients were participants who received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine and hydroxychloroquine non-recipients were those managed with standard of care alone.

Results: Of 150 patients, 148 had mild to moderate disease and two had severe disease. The mean duration from symptom onset to randomisation was 16.6 (SD 10.5; range 3-41) days. A total of 109 (73%) patients (56 standard of care; 53 standard of care plus hydroxychloroquine) had negative conversion well before 28 days, and the remaining 41 (27%) patients (19 standard of care; 22 standard of care plus hydroxychloroquine) were censored as they did not reach negative conversion of virus. The probability of negative conversion by 28 days in the standard of care plus hydroxychloroquine group was 85.4% (95% confidence interval 73.8% to 93.8%), similar to that in the standard of care group (81.3%, 71.2% to 89.6%). The difference between groups was 4.1% (95% confidence interval -10.3% to 18.5%). In the safety population, adverse events were recorded in 7/80 (9%) hydroxychloroquine non-recipients and in 21/70 (30%) hydroxychloroquine recipients. The most common adverse event in the hydroxychloroquine recipients was diarrhoea, reported in 7/70 (10%) patients. Two hydroxychloroquine recipients reported serious adverse events.

Conclusions: Administration of hydroxychloroquine did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion than standard of care alone in patients admitted to hospital with mainly persistent mild to moderate covid-19. Adverse events were higher in hydroxychloroquine recipients than in non-recipients.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2000029868.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work other than those listed above; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Screening, randomisation, and follow-up of trial participants
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of time to negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 on real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in standard of care (SOC) plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) versus SOC in intention to treat population. Data are shown for 75 patients assigned to SOC plus HCQ and 75 assigned to SOC. Overall probability of negative conversion by 28 days was 85.4% (95% CI 73.8% to 93.8%) in SOC plus HCQ group and 81.3% (71.2% to 89.6%) in SOC group (P=0.34). Difference between groups was 4.1% (95% CI –10.3% to 18.5%). Median time to negative conversion was 8 (95% CI 5 to 10) days in SOC plus HCQ group and 7 (5 to 8) days SOC group (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23; P=0.34 by log rank test). Data from patients who did not have negative conversion were censored (tick marks) at last visit date
Fig 3
Fig 3
Kaplan-Meier curves of time to alleviation of clinical symptoms with standard of care (SOC) plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) versus SOC alone in intention to treat population. Data shown are for 55 patients with symptoms assigned to SOC plus HCQ and 64 assigned to SOC. Probability of alleviation of symptoms by 28 days was similar (P=0.97) in patients with SOC with (59.9%, 95% confidence interval 45.0% to 75.3%) and without HCQ (66.6%, 39.5% to 90.9%). Difference between groups was –6.6% (95% CI –41.3% to 28.0%). Median time to alleviation of clinical symptoms was similar in SOC plus HCQ group and SOC group (19 v 21 days; hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.74; P=0.97 by log rank test). Data from patients who did not have alleviation of symptoms were censored (tick marks) at last visit date

References

    1. Coronavirus covid-19 global cases by Johns Hopkins CSSE. .
    1. Dyall J, Gross R, Kindrachuk J, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome: current therapeutic options and potential targets for novel therapies. Drugs 2017;77:1935-66. 10.1007/s40265-017-0830-1
    1. Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, et al. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282.
    1. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res 2020;30:269-71. 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0
    1. Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa237.
    1. Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of covid-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends 2020;14:72-3. 10.5582/bst.2020.01047
    1. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese guideline for the management COVID-19 (version 7.0, in Chinese). 2020. .
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Emergency Use Authorization. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate health care provider fact sheet. .
    1. Piller C. “This is insane!” Many scientists lament Trump's embrace of risky malaria drugs for coronavirus. 2020. .
    1. Rainsford KD, Parke AL, Clifford-Rashotte M, Kean WF. Therapy and pharmacological properties of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases. Inflammopharmacology 2015;23:231-69. 10.1007/s10787-015-0239-y
    1. Baden LR, Rubin EJ. Covid-19 - the search for effective therapy. N Engl J Med 2020:1-2. 10.1056/NEJMe2005477.
    1. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese guideline for the management covid-19 (version 5.0, in Chinese). 2020. .
    1. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study [correction in: BMJ 2020;368:m1295]. BMJ 2020;368:m1091. 10.1136/bmj.m1091
    1. Zheng S, Fan J, Yu F, et al. Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China, January-March 2020: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m1443. 10.1136/bmj.m1443
    1. Harper SA, Bradley JS, Englund JA, et al. Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Seasonal influenza in adults and children–diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:1003-32. 10.1086/598513
    1. Munster T, Gibbs JP, Shen D, et al. Hydroxychloroquine concentration-response relationships in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:1460-9. 10.1002/art.10307
    1. Leung LS, Neal JW, Wakelee HA, Sequist LV, Marmor MF. Rapid onset of retinal toxicity from high-dose hydroxychloroquine given for cancer therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:799-805.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.012
    1. van Roon EN, van den Bemt PM, Jansen TL, Houtman NM, van de Laar MA, Brouwers JR. An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-antirheumatic drugs according to rheumatologists and pharmacists. Clin Ther 2009;31:1737-46. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.009
    1. Ray WA, Murray KT, Meredith S, Narasimhulu SS, Hall K, Stein CM. Oral erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1089-96. 10.1056/NEJMoa040582
    1. Owens RC, Jr, Nolin TD. Antimicrobial-associated QT interval prolongation: pointes of interest. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:1603-11. 10.1086/508873
    1. Schrezenmeier E, Dörner T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020;16:155-66. 10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x
    1. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA 2020. 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe