Efficacy and safety of de-escalation therapy to ertapenem for treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Peerawong Werarak, Anupop Jitmuang, Pattarachai Kiratisin, Visanu Thamlikitkul, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Peerawong Werarak, Anupop Jitmuang, Pattarachai Kiratisin, Visanu Thamlikitkul

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem antibiotics are considered the treatment of choice for serious extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections. The study objectives were to evaluate efficacy and safety of de-escalation therapy to ertapenem for treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of adult patients with documented ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections who had received any group 2 carbapenem for less than 96 h. In the intervention group, the previously-prescribed group 2 carbapenem was de-escalated to ertapenem. In the control group, the group 2 carbapenem was continued.

Results: During June 2011-December 2014, 32 patients were randomized to the de-escalation group and 34 to the control group. Most common sites of infection were urinary tract infection (42%). Characteristics of both groups were comparable. By using a 15% predefined margin, ertapenem was non-inferior to control group regarding the clinical cure rate (%Δ = 14.0 [95% confidence interval: -2.4 to 31.1]), the microbiological eradication rate (%Δ = 4.1 [-5.0 to 13.4]), and the superimposed infection rate (%Δ = -16.5 [-38.4 to 5.3]). Patients in the de-escalation group had a significantly lower 28-day mortality rate (9.4% vs. 29.4%; P = .05), a significantly shorter median length of stay (16.5 days [4.0-73.25] vs. 20.0 days [1.0-112.25]; P = .04), and a significantly lower defined daily dose of carbapenem use (12.9 ± 8.9 vs. 18.4 ± 12.6; P = .05).

Conclusions: Ertapenem could be safely used as de-escalation therapy for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections, once the susceptibility profiles are known. Future studies are needed to investigate ertapenem efficacy against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae pneumonia to determine its applicability in life-threatening conditions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01297842 . Registered on 14 February 2011. First patient enrolled on 27 June 2011.

Keywords: Carbapenem; De-escalation; ESBL; Enterobacteriaceae; Ertapenem.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart

References

    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
    1. Shlaes DM, Gerding DN, John JF, Jr, et al. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(3):584–99. doi: 10.1086/513766.
    1. Antonelli M, Mercurio G, Di Nunno S, Recchioni G, Deangelis G. De-escalation antimicrobial chemotherapy in critically III patients: pros and cons. J Chemother. 2001;13(1):218–23. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement-2.218.
    1. Masterton RG. Antibiotic de-escalation. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27(1):149–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.09.009.
    1. Leone M, Bechis C, Baumstarck K, et al. De-escalation versus continuation of empirical antimicrobial treatment in severe sepsis: a multicenter non-blinded randomized noninferiority trial. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(10):1399–408. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3411-8.
    1. Mokart D, Slehofer G, Lambert J, et al. De-escalation of antimicrobial treatment in neutropenic patients with severe sepsis: results from an observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(1):41–9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3148-9.
    1. Lew KY, Ng TM, Tan M, et al. Safety and clinical outcomes of carbapenem de-escalation as part of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in an ESBL-endemic setting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(4):1219–25.
    1. Zhanel GG, Johanson C, Embil JM, et al. Ertapenem: review of a new carbapenem. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2005;3(1):23–39. doi: 10.1586/14787210.3.1.23.
    1. Falagas ME, Tansarli GS, Kapaskelis A, Vardakas KZ. Ertapenem use and antimicrobial resistance to group 2 carbapenems in Gram-negative infections: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2013;11(1):69–78. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.149.
    1. Vardakas KZ, Tansarli GS, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(12):2793–803. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks301.
    1. Teng CP, Chen HH, Chan J, Lye DC. Ertapenem for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30(4):356–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.016.
    1. Berg ML, Crank CW, Philbrick AH, Hayden MK. Efficacy of ertapenem for consolidation therapy of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative infections: a case series report. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(2):207–12. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K365.
    1. Collins VL, Marchaim D, Pogue JM, et al. Efficacy of ertapenem for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):2173–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05913-11.
    1. Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Bonomo RA, Carmeli Y, et al. Ertapenem for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a multinational pre-registered cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(6):1672–80. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv502.
    1. Musson DG, Majumdar A, Birk K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered ertapenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(5):1732–5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1732-1735.2003.
    1. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.
    1. Institute CaLS. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement: M100-S21: Wayne; Clinical Lab Standards Institute. 2011.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe